Or am I reading too much into it?
Of course, because it's the evolution.
Of course. It's a star cocoon.
>>29640318
>IT'S SUFFOCATING
ANON, HOW COULD YOU
>>29640318
Yes anon. We already knew this
>>29640318
its Magearna's face without all the metal
>>29640365
Deepest Lore?
>>29640318
It's going to be so weird to have box legendaries that have evolve.
Can they even be considered legendary?
>>29640385
It will be so weird to have a legendary that lays eggs. Can Manaphy even be considered a legendary?
It will be so weird to have legendaries with genders. Can Latios/Latias even be considered legendaries?
Not the first time they've shaken up what a legendary is. Only new thing is that these are box legendaries, which also means they can't be considered anything but legendary
>>29640318
WTF I always thought it was the eye of sauron in there, not an entire face
>>29640452
I know there has been past anomalies with legendaries, but evolutions are such a core staple for "normal" Pokemon. It doesn't feel right to call a Pokemon legendary when it evolves.
Oh wow I didn't notice the actual eyes before.
>>29640385
They're man-made Pokémon like Magearna.
It evolves because it's not a naturally occurring legend but an artificial Pokémon made to be as powerful as legends.
>>29640452
And who says they'll be able to breed
>>29640469
>>29640504
Jesus, glad I'm not the only one who never noticed the face before. I've only ever seen the weird shell thing.
OP is probably right.
>>29640801
Wrong. These two pokemon are unrelated to the box legionaries. Screenshot this.
>>29642004
Ready to feed it to you when the time comes, Anon.