Annyone else thinks that 73 new pokemon is too much?

>>29634521
i was hoping 1

File: 1477762131418.jpg (11KB, 221x225px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 221x225px

>>29634521

>>29634521
Fuck you, kys! We didn't get nearly enough. We should have got 120, at least.

>>29634564
Because new pokemon are pointless games would be more fun without them.

>>29634521
Is there anything interesting left in a pokemon game other than the new pokemon?

>>29634521
Dubs say OPs mom is a hooker
9 only means that's how he was made

>>29634581
120 new pokemon is going to ruin the game,you fuck.

>>29634591
>>29634521
>>29634611
Are you that same guy who's been going around saying the newer games are shit because they keep introducing new pokemon?

>>29634597
Yes,finidng your old bros in new regions insread of these pointless new pokemon.

>>29634598
Sounds like OP's mother is a pretty swell gal.

>>29634611
No, 72 new mons ruined the game. 120 new mons fixes the game, you dumbass.

This is a bait thread. Stop responding.

>>29634645
But new pokemon aren't fun anon,that's why every game should be like XY,BUT with less new pokemon XYstill had too mcuh.

Did you make this thread too?
>>29633584

>>29634699
X and U sucked ass, because they lacked new Pokemon. New Pokemon ARE fun, and we need to get about 100+ each new Gen if they expect us to wait 2-3 years for the next games.

>>29634713
No.

But that thread's OP is definitly a inteligent dude.

>>29634763
Tl;Dr cuz you're an idiot.

>>29634763
>inteligent
Unlike you I guess.

>>29634779
Wainting new pokemon is idioting

>>29634819
Tl;Dr cuz bad Engrish and shitty idears. Please stop being so stupid OP. New Pokemon ARE good, and we DO want more of them, because more IS better.

>>29634854
Stupid idiot stop destroying the franchise.

All your shitty requests for more new pokemon is going to end up in another generation with 156 new pokemon and very few old pokemon,is that what you want? another bad game?

>>29634887
Yes, thank you, I'd love to play another GOOD GAME. Idiots and casuals, and genwunners, like you, are killing my franchise with your idiocy.

>>29634924
>156 new pokemon
>0 OLD POKEMON
HOW A GAME WITHOUT OLD POKEMON CAN BE GOOD,IDIOT?

>>29634950
How a NEW GAME with little to no NEW POKEMON be good, dumbass?!

>>29634950
Because the old pokemon were a product of limitation so we couldn't have particularly "monsterish" monsters.
In other words despite being iconic they're bad at their namesake.

>>29634976
This.

>>29634950
But anon, in a few years all of these pokemon will be old in comparison to the next set. We have 721 old mons at this point. And in a few years we'll have 802. Chillax.

>>29634521
this is a weird ass mindset.

>>29634969
HAHAHA.

If they release a game with 156 new pokemon and 40 old pokemon,nobody is going to buy it or be hyped about it.

>>29635043
And no one was hyped for FRLG either what's your point?

>>29634521
>73 new pokemon is too much
I've got bad new for you anon. There are 81 new Pokemon.

>>29635060
S*** That's even worse,i'm not buying this game it's horrible,so many new pokemon and so few old pokemon.

File: 1476706643385.png (346KB, 665x498px) Image search: [Google]

346KB, 665x498px

>>29634611
>>29634627
>>29634887
>>29634950
>>29635043

OP needs to learn English and the proper use of commas.

>>29635082
Oh man, one less sale, what will GF ever do?

>>29635043
Have you even played BW? Everyone was hyped as he'll for it.

>>29635133
Yeah, unfortunately it followed the worst gen yet and that really impacted the sales negatively.

>>29635133
Yeah,and it was one of the worst games in the nintendo ds,because to much new pokemon and no old pokemon,garbage.

>>29635145
Not really. If you mean gen 4, it was great too.

>>29635153
Uh, no, that made it good. You're stupid af if you think otherwise.

https://www.change.org/p/the-true-fans-of-pokemon-please-no-more-new-pokemon-game-freak

Please,true pokemon fans,i need your help.

I want more. I always expected they'd come out with 150 every new gen.

File: tmp_13570-FB_IMG_1477982781437-492951932.jpg (23KB, 571x598px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 571x598px

>>29635318
Wth, why is more pokemon a bad thing? Fuck off with that shit.

>>29635460
because finding and using new pokemon isn't fun

>>29635494
But in a few years they'll be old pokemon. By wanting less new pokemon you want less additional old pokemon. If you really want old pokemon, you would want more new pokemon.

>>29635538
Old pokemon = GEN 1-6 the others are garbage

>>29635564
But when gen 8 releases the gen 7 pokemon will be old.

>>29635494
It ain't that hard dude.

There should be an additional 150 Pokemon every single game that's how I feel

>>29635575
Hardly. I still see gen 3 as a new gen. I'm eating member berries or can't seem to take off my nostalgia glasses.

Why you guys don't firm the petition?

>>29635618

You and me both do
>>29635433

>>29635628
Do you want me to print it out and freeze it or something? Because that would firm it up.

>>29635628
Because we're not retarded children.

Stop fucking replying. He keeps making these threads because you idiots will keep replying.

>>29635657
Tell us again in another thread

>>29635657
it's fun who cares if it's bait or not

>>29634591
hey guys, lets have a Pokemon game without Pokemon!

Literally and figuratively just as dumb a statement as the one you just made

why do you guys want new pokemon?

>>29635755
Because you ignorant slut. We want to catch them all

>>29635792
You're weird

>>29635890
Do you not want to catch them all anon? Have you even caught them all anon?

>>29635921
in red and blue yes

>>29635956
But that's not all anon. Are you even working on catching all of the later ones?

>>29635974
>>29635974
I only care about GEN 1 anoon

Quality over quantity. Gamefreak should have just made 10 new mons for gen 7.

>29636260
0

File: image.jpg (24KB, 480x360px)

24KB, 480x360px

>>29634752
Don't you have middle school homework to do or something?