Am I missing anyone?
>>29545007
>owls
I don't think I'd consider the Ludicolo line birds.
I mean yeah, Ludicolo has a beak, but that's pretty much the only bird-like thing about him.
>>29545039
I put him on there to add to the non-flying pokemon. If enough people agree, I'll just remove his line. I know he's based off of a Kappa.
>>29545007
>everything with a beak is a bird
remove Lotad line, Hoothoot line, Magby line and Rowlet line
>>29545039
>implying ducks aren't birds
>aerodactyl
>magmortar
>tapu koko
>sigilyph
>togepi
>silvally
>birds
>>29545007
Aerodactyl is a pterodactyl, which I wouldn't count as a bird.
Togepi doesn't really have any bird-like qualities, it's just an egg child.
Unown are letters, not birds.
The Lotad line aren't really birds, even if they have beaks.
You forgot the Eon Duo.
The Magmar line has some duck-like qualities, I guess I'll give it to you. It's mostly in the beak but whatever.
Cresselia is sort of a bird I guess.
Sigilyph is some sort of Peruvian wind chime, I wouldn't include it.
Type: Null and Silvally are chimeras, which may contain some bird-like elements, but are not in and of themselves birds. And really, the only avian qualities they seem to possess are their plumage.
Aerodactyl definitely isn't a bird. It's not even based off of a dinosaur.
>>29545007
Beard thread?
Bear thread?
>>29545007
do people genuinely believe that owls aren't birds
>>29545972
>Sigilyph is some sort of Peruvian wind chime
Arceus, OP. Give it a flying plate.
>>29545094
how are owls not birds?
>>29546115
Right. The Nazca lines are in Peru. That one might look sort of like a hummingbird, but that doesn't change the fact that Sigilyph is a sphere with weird wings and tassels. What, is Drifblim a bird?
Include everything that learns Brave Bird including Smeargle.
>>29546158
Newfag.
>>29546078
>implying owls are birds