Gender Differences

Pic related is the new Vespiquen and Salandit will probably have a high male ratio to make her rarer.

>>29283001
>new vespiquen
>not bounsweet

>>29282948
I think pic related probably going to be female only.

I don't know why they didn't make any for the rest but it's not a big deal.

>>29283066
It's the first gen in 10 years (aka half the franchise) to completely ignore them, though.

>>29283092
It's definitely odd, I just meant that I'm not too bothered by it. Can't find a reasonable explanation for cutting them out, though.

>>29283092
Considering gender differences were introduced halfway through the series (gen 4 for retards, unless you count the Nidos) and that no one really cares about them, they could have taken it out. It's just more work for little payoff.

>>29282948
>Why do none of the Alolan forms have gender differences, either? Regular Ratatta, Raticate and Raichu had them.
No megas had gender differences despite their regular versions having them either. All Garchomps revert to male upon mega.

>Also, pic related
Maybe we just have a lot of male/female exclusive Pokemon this gen

>>29283179
I guess, but considering they were getting more and more divergent (Mewostic) and how forms are handled in Gen VII (types, maybe stats/movesets being different), you'd think they could have expanded on it.

File: garchomp_whatever.png (56KB, 230x160px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 230x160px

>>29283302
>Garchomps change gender at will.

This shit is why I think we may be missing some formes at least. Maybe not whole new mons but at least some gender differences and maybe some forms.

They stopped caring about minor gender differences back in gen 4.
Same with cross-gen evos. It's one of those things they've just left behind.

>>29285815
Yeah, but they did have larger ones in Gen 5 and 6. Feels weird for them to be completely gone.

>>29286977
They dropped new baby mons since 5.

Gender forms arent getting new ones this year.