A farewell to the following:
>Denialfags
Luchalitten and friends confirmed
>Riddlerfags
Didn't get Toucanmon placement right.
Also. He's now irrelevant.
>Chineseleakerfags
No Snowman. Leaker BTFO.
What a day to be alive. You won't be missed.
>>29242425
>>29242425
>Snowman was mistranslated from Yeti, the Snow Crab Yeti was the snowman
>Dolpin was one of the Topu
>>29242883
>>29242425
Snowman was mistranslation of Yeti, a Topu or Wishiwashi could be mistaken for a Dolphin
Riddler got a previous placement wrong as well, simply showing he's only given pieces of information and assumptions are used after that. you are correct that he's effectively irrelevant now as most of his leaks are related to Pokemon, and while a few are not we can't be sure he interpreted them correctly.
Ah yes, the classic "if a leaker gets a million things right and one thing wrong, then he's automatically a fraud and the million things he got right were just lucky guesses" meme. One of my favorites.
>>29242883
> a crab yeti is a snowman
naw, fuck off with that
>>29242950
>>29243200
>Yeti
>Abominable Snowma
???????
A farewell to the following:
>any sort of hope or excitement directed towards SM
>>29242950
this was riddlerfags all along though
>>29242425
the placement was irrelevant as only faggots like you assume it mattered, notice how Silvally's position was irrelevant to Type:Null's position?
snowman was yeti
you must be a denialfag falseflagging
>>29244235
He specifically put two question marks next to Pikipek for evolutions. Riddler was full of shit and you can fuck off at any time
>>29244285
He also had regular Diglett and Dugtrio in his "confirmed old mon" list on the bottom.
He definitely knew some things, but certainly not everything.
>>29244285
And? Pikapek had two evolutions. The toucan was still a mysterymon back then after all. He never stated if the mons were evolutions or such, from what I've seen only posters interpreted it as such
If you're going to be anal about semantics, then you'll end up being that guy who "fuck that guy who got 99% right since he got 1% wrong"
>>29242425
>Riddler debunked
Why? He knows about pokemon names and some inspiration. He put toucan in wrong place same as Silvally, because his info was limited, that's all. What's wrong with you, OP?
>also no snowman
>what Crabrawler evo based on the abominable snowman
Chinese leaks was right, Riddler was, according to his limited info, right. Denialfags have been the loosers here.
>>29243034
>already making excuses
If the leaker isn't 100% right, then they should be treated as 100% wrong. No buts or ifs, no excuses, no exceptions.
>>29245490
that's not how it works you idiot