So how many denialfags from this gen were around here for Wottergate and if so which side were you on at the time? I'm genuinely curious.
I was a Denialfag in Gen5. I could not believe that snowcone otter turned into a retarded man-horse seal. There were also plenty of good cases made for them being false.
This gen though I was pretty sure they were real from the get go. As time went on they only got more and more convincing. I feel like people who were in denial up until tonight had to just be willing themselves to be retarded.
But I was that retard once, so I'm curious if the fallout from Gen5's starter evo leak disaster colored anyone else's opinion of this gen's evo debacle.
>>29235053
Why the fuck do you care? Make a poll on facebook
>>29235506
What the fuck does facebook have to do with Pokemon?
Hardly anyone browsing /vp/ right now was around for wottergate, this place is being flooded with crossboarders/redditors right now.
Anyway, I was a denialfag primarily because I hated (and still hate) all 3 of them. After the Mallow reveal, I accepted that they were legit but still wished they changed. I was a denialfag in Gen 5, but was mostly enjoying the shitstorms. Wottergate was fun because there had never been anything like it prior in /vp/'s brief history, this was just tiresome and very few people are actually happy even if they were a leakfag.
Gen 5's starters aren't actually all that bad outside of maybe the Tepig line, and Gen 5 as a whole was stellar. With Gen 7, they stared out so strong only to go to waste, this is the first time I'm boxing my starter right off the bat.
>>29235053
Denialfag here and I was right on every other matter, including wottergate.
Gonna go ahead and roll the dice and jump on the early train that they scrubbed 20+ Pokemon from the Dex for the demo. They wouldn't seriously do this shit to us. [Spoiler] Would they? [/spoiler]
I've never been a denialfag.
I'm either lucky or can tell which is real.