Since we are getting the whole dex in two days, let's have one of these. I revamped it so it's quicker to color it.
>>29170638
>Putting in Fakemon
>Putting in uncatchable NPC's
>Putting in a ability
>Putting in Alola Forms
>Putting in the Pokedex itself
>Putting in Zygarde cells and cores
OP is a fag
>>29170641
Could someone make the transparency white instead please?
>>29170787
>>29170802
Thank you
Overall pretty pleased with this gen.
My team's probably gonna be Salandit, Kommo-o, Wimpod, Vikavolt, Sensu Oricorio and maybe Silvally as a steel type.
A lot of neutrals, but I do like this gen overall
Here's my shit taste
>>29170912
Mastah Prahn working stupid piggu thinking Rucharitten is rear haha!
damn no one likes magearna
>>29170963
One of the worst designs they've ever made.
>>29170638
UBs arent pokémon fucking faggot
I'd say edgewolf and luchacat and maybe the pikaclone are shit. UB's are implied as shit.
Good gen overall!
>>29170978
>not pokemon
>they have pokemon move sets
>caring about the content of an unspecific rate thread
Calm your tits amigo, we's just rating designs
I like how this gen is shaping up.. my only real hope it's that we have at least more mons than in XY, that fucking abysmal dex ruined the games for me.
>>29171036
>wanting huge amounts of rushed shitmons
Go back to Gen V
>>29171071
Gen V was good though
>>29171036
The Dex wasn't X and Y's problem.
The Dex was actually quite nice, a good amount of good and new Pokemon while still having the option to go with older Pokemon you like. I think the real problem of these games was how easy they were and how empty the region seemed. And I see these problems seem to have been fixed with Sun and Moon while maintaining the good Dex system.
>whole dex in two days
?????
Bleh.
>>29171108
>this
>good
Christ, I really do love this generation's designs.
>>29171218
Simipour isn't the entirety of Gen V you retard
>>29170874
mine's gonna be exactly that with marowak or ninetales instead of oricorio
>>29171243
Yeah, but 3 Niglets that evolve into 3 more Niggers, Like come on.
>>29170785
Being this retarded.
I am pretty positive about this gen it turns out
>>29171452
It's always sad to see that grown-ass adults still can't use MS Paint.
>>29171452
God damn those offset lines though.
Blind as Fug, L2Paint.
I have to say I haven't been this excited for a gen in a little while, things are shaping up to be really neat. I'm just not fond of the whole ultra beasts thing they have going on. Kinda hoping they're just 'bosses' and not actually catchable pokemon.
pretty much rated on how likely i am to use them on a team, red are the only ones i actually dislike
>>29170638
>>29170638
No shit tier this gen
Red : Meh tier
Orange : Not bad tier
Yellow : Okay tier
Light green : Good tier
Green : God tier
Blue : Bro tier
Purple : Good Digimon tier
Doublemulticolor : Disco tier
It's okay
I like them
I don't know to rate properly
Imo.
im actually disappointed with gen 7
>>29172108
sure
>>29172136
>these opinions are different than mine
>i must disregard there are people who disagree with me
ok
>>29172136
Shit taste =/= bait.
>>29171800
Thanks for the doubledisco-color, anon.
So far I'm counting more greens than reds, which means by popular consensus that this gen is more accepted than past ones and probably (2 out of 3 anons) in most top 3 of all time.
And we have still 2 days to know to full dex and stats.
I don't think I'm a very harsh judge.
I still feel like I'll be disappointed in the long run. It's a fucking hawaii region, the designs should've been exploding with creativity because they have so much to draw from. I feel like when the full dex comes around it'll be a bit disappointing
>>29170921
Apart from Brionne, Crabrawler and Drampa, I pretty much agree with this 100%
Niceu tasteu desu
>>29171218
The monkeys are probably the shittiest designs in Gen V, but they have their good points.
>Signature mons of the Striaton Gym, teaches newbies about type matchups
>"See no evil, Hear no evil, Speak no evil" theming is cool
But
>Terrible stats
>Terrible movepool
>Pushed so hard as a member of your team early on, then ends up being irredeemably shit in battle later
>Have to waste a perfectly good stone to evolve it
>Evolved designs look completely retardedexcept Simisage
>>29170638
rate my taste
Still unsure how i feel about this Gen, hoping the dex leaks this week.
>>29173560
shit taste
>>29173596
Stop not liking what I like
am I too harsh?
Is it bad that I like them all? They aren't Gen5Mon.
>>29173717
you're an 8/10 in my book
>>29170921
>Hating on Drampa
well you're right about your taste, anon.......
Yes my taste is horrible
>>29170638
who says we're getting the dex in two days
>>29174792
I does
>>29170638
Note rating unconfirmed Pokemon/things that aren't Pokemon
weird taste
>>29175030
>not rating things that aren't Pokemon
rates Ultra Beasts
The title says it's a rate thread. Rate what you have. OP could have put a potato in there I'd still rate it.
>>29175030
>Not rating things that aren't pokemon
>Not rating Rotom Dexform
>Rating UB
Wtf anon
>>29170638
file name
>>29170638
Overall a great generation so far
>>29170638
Maybe I'm being a bit though, but there. Overall I really like Gen 7's designs.
>>29175210
>>29175218
They're Pokemon and you both know it. They've been rebranding the blanket label of legendary Pokemon more recently by calling a certain sect of legendary Pokemon "mythical" Pokemon. If you think the term "Ultra Beast" doesn't just refer to another brand of legendary Pokemon, you're just as bad as denialfags.
I'll be honest. I'm not a fan of Pokemon designs this gen. Everything else looks really neat, though.
>>29175340
Sure, sure. We'll see in November.
>>29175340
This. It's Gamefreak hyping things up with misleading labels. They have complex, future-proofed models (unlike the trainers), and two different reliable leakers have claimed them as Pokemon. Plus there's the fact that UB-01 clearly has a cry and a battle intro.
>>29171635
Why do you dislike Morelull? Just curious.
>>29175385
>We'll see in November.
We'll see in under two days. Demo datamines from ORAS listed all of the level up movepools and TM/HM moves, as well as dex sprites. If UBs have dex sprites and full movepool lists, we'll know they're Pokemon.
>>29175439
Yeah, you're probably right about that.
This is the first time I'm seeing all the Alolamons. Is it me or is the bear evolution, smiling fish and walking tiger look out of place?
Honestly the first gen I've absolutely hated. Only a handful of good mons, and everything else about this game I despise. Z-Moves, Alola forms, the Hawaiian theme, it's all terrible.
>>29175784
y tho
>>29175856
Where to start? How about the Hawaii setting? There's no subtely involved, and it gets old really fast. There's too many mons that are meant to coincide with the Hawaiian theme, but then when you have mons that clearly don't fit in a tropical environment, they just look grossly out of place, like Bewear.
Alolan forms are just straight-up pandering to the Gen I crowd. They look disgusting and don't serve any purpose.
There is an overall decline in the quality of design of Pokemon. The proportions of half these mons are so out of walk I don't even know what they're supposed to be. Yungoos and Pikipek are perfect examples of what I mean, when you compare them to Rattata and Pidgey.
>>29175784
This taste is awful.
At least you like Gumshoos, Salandit, and Silvally.
>>29175951
>The proportions of half these mons are so out of walk I don't even know what they're supposed to be. Yungoos and Pikipek are perfect examples of what I mean
They're a mongoose and a woodpecker. Have you never seen either of those things before?
Rattata and Pidgey are a purple rat and some generic bird.
>>29170638
I feel like I'm maybe too happy about this gen
>>29176001
They look like they were scribbled out in a matter of seconds. Pokemon are just misshapen blobs now with big eyes and stumpy limbs. There's no real definition to them, and when their is they tack on a bunch of useless shit. Like I said, no subtlety.
>>29170638
>>29175951
Oh boy...
Mons that don't fit their environment have always been a thing; there's no doubt about that. While Bewear definitely doesn't fit in, Pokemon that don't fit in have been such a frequent reoccurring thing that it's not that much of an issue personally. I mean, in the Pokemon world, there are penguins in Japan and pandas in France! And luchadors in Stonehenge in France. And now koalas in Hawaii.
I cannot argue with you about Alola forms; they do seem to be "pandering" to the gen 1 crowd. But I see them more as a "re-imagined" version. As for looking disgusting, well, I guess that's your opinion, and that's ok.
But this last one is something I can't overlook. Proportions are definitely out there, but Pokemon itself was never that realistic, so what gives? Pokemon is changing, just like art. Look at art from the 90s and look at art today. See how different things are? Refer to this relevant poll: http://www.strawpoll.me/11367322/r
I can understand why you don't like a lot of the new Pokemon. But we can all just accept and move on, right?
>>29175340
Well, if you want to consider them as pokemon, it's okay I guess. I don't agree, and I am not sure, but I remember gamefreak saying that they aren't, but whatever.
What bothers me the most is that you didn't rate Rotomdex, which is obviously a Pokemon. If you don't consider it as a pokemon, I would like to know what is a pokemon for you.
>>29175439
If they are pokemon from another dimension or some shit like that, they probably won't be in the dex, just like Type:Null is an error. I don't think it is relevant.
Basically:
5/5: Cutiefly, Alola Raichu, Komala
1/5: Ash Greninja
Also I had a dream last night. I saw Morelull's evolution in it!
I can't wait for the leakfags in this thread to get BTFO in a few days.
There are a lot of good designs this gen
>>29176349
>If they are pokemon from another dimension or some shit like that, they probably won't be in the dex, just like Type:Null is an error. I don't think it is relevant.
It's absolutely relevant. If they have the same information as all other Pokemok in the datamine, they're Pokemon. If they don't, then they aren't. Also, please don't bring Type: Null headcanon into this.
Riddler includes them in his dex anyway.
>>29176704
>Alolan Exeggutor 1/5
>Lycanroc the Hedgehog 5/5
Kill yourself.
meh
I only subtracted points from Rotomdex because he doesn't match the design of the other rotom forms.
OP here. Do you guys prefer this template or the previous one?
>>29176932
not this one
It just looks pretty boring, and how can it be much different from Foongus/Amoongus? Never really enjoyed Mushroom pokemon anyways.. just my opinion really. I think A Raichu is pretty dope, why don't you?
>>29176932
Could care less about the boxes but a white background makes it easier to edit in Paint, which is what most people (like >>29170811) will be using for this.
Clear backgrounds like >>29170641 mean I have to start up GIMP which is a fucking hassle.
I'm mostly meh to decently happy about the designs this gen. Fortunately, there are very few I hate, but there are just about as many as I really dislike that I love.
>>29177056
OK. I forgot to get rid of the transparency, it was always meant for MS Paint.
>>29171020
what shit taste!
>>29176349
It's the Pokedex this time around. It's not a usable Pokemon. So what's the point?
>>29171239
>>29170874
>>29175316
>Say you're happy with the pokemon this gen
>mostly orange and yellows
I don't understand...
>>29177056
Why so? I never had a problem editing stuff with clear background on paint.
>>29170638
this generation has the best starters and the best box legendaries. there's some really shitty designs too but, in general, it seems like this is gonna be a great gen
>>29170638
7/10
>>29170765
8/10
>>29170874
8/10
>>29170899
9/10
>>29170912
7/10
>>29170921
8/10
>>29170958
7/10
>>29171020
5/10
>>29171036
10/10
>>29171179
9/10
>>29171239
7/10
>>29171344
3/10
>>29171452
Whatareyoudoing/10
>>29171649
toopositive/10
>>29171664
6/10
>>29171716
7/10
>>29171800
9/10
>>29172108
1/10
>>29175340
I sure hope so. I love beauty and UB-01
>>29176010
10/10 Which version are you getting?
Really solid designs all around I'd say.
The last time I thought the whole evolution line for the grass starter was great was in Gen 3, here's hoping the final evo is legit.
r8
R8 my shit taste
>>29170638
>all this hate for the pseudo line
I've never been so disgusted with /vp/ in my life. Don't even reply to me.
Here, let me rate everyone in this thread:
10 - (10/83) for every opinion you don't share with me/10
>>29180379
I don't think Kommo-o is the pseudo. Probably the Haxorus.
But yeah Kommo-o haters have irredeemably shit taste and bad opinions. This isn't even up for debate, just a clear indication of ignorance and lack of aesthetic sense.
>>29180576
>mfw the pseudo is bug-type
With Tortunator, Drampa and Kommo-o, if the pseudo turns out to be another Dragon type that is not Kommo-o, I'll burn my 3ds
>>29180700
>non-dragon pseudo
I'll admit they got lucky with TTar and Metagross being such great designs, but it's probably not gonna happen again. Psuedos are dragons, that's the end of it really.
>>29180832
It needs to be a fairy.
>>29180861
Maybe dragon/fairy then. What a great typing too. Make it happen GF! As long as it's not as autistic as mega altaria.
>>29180898
>shitting on mega altaria
You best be joking.
>>29180922
Mega altaria is cancer. At least defensive sets. If DD set then it's just another boring bulky offensive mon.
Based on design mostly
Really good gen for the most part, but where it's bad, it's very bad
>>29170638
gen 7 was a mistake
Very happy with this gen so far. Hopefully the rest of the dex isn't trash.
>>29170638
Very happy with this gen
regardless of my rating I really like this gen a lot, but this is just the grades I came up with.
r8 me
I'm still hopeful for this gen, but I'm really not liking a lot of what we've seen.
If all of these were averaged I'm pretty sure either Salandit or !pikachu would win.
>>29181956
They were averaged when we only had these.
Vikavolt, Rowlet, Ninetales, Wishiwashi and Salandit are favorites. I'll do another one when SM drops.
>>29182047
How can /vp/ have good taste with Salandit and even Vikavolt (how the fuck did that win here?), yet completely drop the ball when it comes to the new pseudo line? It's like you guys don't know whether you want to have good taste or shit taste.
>>29182448
I'm not saying that the supposed-pseudo line is bad, I really like them, but Salandit and Vikavolt are amazing designs. If you don't like them, as a /vp/ user, you have objectively shit taste. Stats tell the truth
>>29182576
I was referring to this thread and /vp/ in general, not any one person. If you don't like the new pseudo like then you have objectively shit taste as well, which is why it is puzzling that /vp/ in some cases has good taste and in other cases has horrible taste. I suppose that's normal, but it stands out here more for some reason. It's too far on both extremes.
purple stars: I absolutely want to train them.
blue stars: I want to train them.
>>29170641
Hey OP can you make these for the gen 1/2/3/4/5/6 pokemon too plz
>only 90 new pokes
Looking like it's gonna be another ~100 pokemon generation. How disappointing.
>>29182769
Forgot to mention 14 of them aren't new either. That's even worse than I realized. Could this be another fucking XY? I thought they'd learn better from that blunder.
>>29170638
Overall I've really liked this gen so far.
This gen is looking good. I just hope they don't mess with Wimpod and Salandit's evo. Jangmo-o already had a terrible fate.
This looks negative, but really all the 3/5's are just ones i'm neutral about, maybe I'll like them later
>>29182996
how can you mimikyu you monster?
>>29175951
>complains about genwunner pandering
>is clearly a genwunner
>>29177303
>I'll make up my own rating system just to make my opinions more incendiary
>>29183886
Because it's ugly, even for Pikachu doll
It's a shame that most of /vp/ loves Mimikyu because its pokedex description says that Mimikyu wants to be loved.
(If Mimikyu really wants to be loved, he should pick Gardevoir doll. A good one)
The starters started to grew on me like cancer.
Overall, I'm very excited for this gen. Still not pleased if the starters are going to end up how it seems; we didn't need another fire starter with a heavy fighting motif (yes it's typing may be fire/dark but ffs it's another wrestler/fighter).
I'm all over the place this gen.
I love Dartrix and the Sun exclusives, yet I'm still picking Popplio and playing Moon...
Despite what the image may make you think, I'm pretty happy with Gen VII.
Something like this I guess. The star is for the ones I'm considering for my team.
I genuinely think this is the best gen in a long time.
Kinda hoping they scrubbed the demo so we don't have anymore pokemon revealed. Theres so many already
>>29177303
edgelord detected
Most of gen's pokemon are bros. Can't really complain too much.
>>29181058
>Having taste this bad
>>29170638
I'm really liking this gen so far.
>>29181058
>Rotomdex is 5/5 but Type:Null is 1/5.
Either this is elaborate bait or you're taste is complete garbage.
>>29170638
Gen 7 is my favorite generation design-wise since Gen2.
>>29182996
>hating Poppmaid
>hating Tsareena
>hating Mimikyu
>hating Pyukumuku
>hating Expand Mosquito
worst taste ITT
>>29171716
Pretty decent all around thus far.
>>29175784
desu I can see what you're preferences are.
Lots of Pokemon in this gen fall victim to having a lot of style but neglecting basic anatomy and having strange geometry. Shit like Crabrawler's legs and Bewear's lack of any structure are prime examples of this, as thinking about them it's hard to grasp how they work. It's also stuff like Gumshoos, Passimian and Oranguru which have relatively realistic proportions. I feel like a lot of your distastes will be fixed by getting used to 3D models; stuff like Tsareena and Drampa that have weird art may look a bit stronger in game.
About the Hawaiian theme, I personally love that GF is sticking to a central theme for once. Being in discount New York and seeing a cactus and a flying squirrel never really immersed me. But hey, opinions, and I can see where the theme gets a bit overbearing.
Overall, I really love this gen. Its really appealing to my tastes, which is making it hard to pick a team of only 6 mons. I honestly can't say I completely despise any pokemon this gen.( I only dislike Comfey for the fact that its gonna be a trade of the mark cute shitmon that won't evolve and is just there to fill the dex. )
I have a solid amount of indifference, but I'm usually like that. Overall I think this gen's pokemon are above-average
I have absolutely no idea how I feel about whimpod, I love it but I don't want to use it ever.
>>29187359
Thanks doc
I've accepted Luchalitten and Co. as the real deal but until we get the final official art I'll continue to erase them out of every single template
Seems good, ratings will change when stats come out tho
I'm overall pretty pleased, I just hate most of the Kalos related mons.
Meh.
I know the replys I'm going to get.
>>29170638
I generally never actively dislike mons
This gen is pretty comfy though
I just don't see the diff between the Zygarde cells hence one being red I guess?
>>29177230
I just came back to this thread for some reason, but 3/5 isn't bad by any means. Quit thinking in terms of video game review scores.
>>29170638
Just to inform anyone, I'm extremely strict with my rankings. 4/5 are pokemon I really like and will probably be using. 5/5 is perfect design. And the Pokemon on 2/5 I still like, just not greatly. Only 1/5 are the designs I don't really care for.
This looks more negative than it is, but that's because I'm not really going by what the numbers say the colors should mean. My tiers are simply Awesome/Great/Good/Acceptable/Dislike.