Food Type

>buffing fire EVEN more

Booger-Type
Weaknesses: Flying, Ice, Bug(?)
Resistances: Steel, Ground, Fighting(?), Electric, Fire(?)
SE Against: Fairy, Ground
NVE Against: Flying, Steel, Ice

Grimer line as Poison/Booger
Tangela and Tangrowth become Grass/Booger
Slugma becomes Fire/Booger (Magcargo remains Fire/Rock)
Gulpin line becomes Booger/Poison
Burmy becomes Bug/Booger (Mothim and Wormadam's forms remain unchanged.)
Solosis line becomes Psychic/Booger
Cubchoo line as Ice/Booger
Accelgor as Bug/Booger
Swirlix line becomes Booger/Fairy
Goomy line becomes Booger/Dragon

There are plenty other Pokemon that could make good Booger-types, but it would involve retconning their existing dual-types which Gamefreak doesn't seem to like doing. I'd propose the Shellos line as Water/Booger, Woobat line as Booger/Flying, possibly something with the Tympole or Pineco lines, and maybe Politoed as Water/Booger.

File: pokemon sushi 3.jpg (33KB, 400x296px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 400x296px

>>29165069
Personally I think it should be immune to fire, or resistant to it. I know the logic isn't perfect, but I think it could work.

Here are my ideas for a Gourmet Type:


Super-effective against: Psychic, Fighting, Fairy, Ghost (sweet tooths + leaving food for the departed)
Weaknesses: Bug, Dark, Poison (pests and decay)
Resists: Psychic, Fairy, Ghost, Ice (refrigeration)
Immunities: Fire (cooking only enhances the flavor)

>>29165069
>implying not all Pokemon are food type
Nigga, I would eat more than half of the grass types and bird mons

>>29165077
"sound" type is just seriously so dumb.