>All these waifumon pandering
Is Pokemon dead?
>>29136315
It is more alive than One Piece.
It's never been more alive
>>29136315
waifu pandering existed since gen 1 you fucking faggot
>>29136406
No one wants to fuck a Jynx.
>>29136406
You're fucking retarded
>>29136333
One Piece may have turned into shit after the timeskip but it's still alive
>>29136424
>rule 34 jynx
hahaha faggot
>>29136424
You gotta be gay not to want them DSL.
I'd rather a Smoochum, though.
>>29136424
I would face fuck it
>>29136506
This tbhfamdesu
>>29136315
>Gen 7 is filled to the brim with god-awful, revoltingly poor designs, such as Bewear, the sand castle, Drampa, Yungoos, etc.
>Everyone adores them and defends them by saying "THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO BE UGLY, THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO BE UNREALISTIC!"
>They make one feminine pokemon that's supposed to look cute
>"WOW GF IS PANDERING SO MUCH WTF WHY DID THEY MAKE IT SO CUTE GEN 7 IS DEAD"
I hate you faggots so much. Why is it okay for a pokemon to be ugly, as long as it's relevant to the design, but it's not okay for a pokemon to be cute, even though it's obviously meant to be?
Oh yeah, because /vp/ is full of contrarian faggots who hate anything that looks good and loves everything that looks bad.
>>29136664
>Pallosand is bad
>>29136664
>make one feminine pokemon
>>29136664
What? I like pallosand and drampa
So where do I stand if I hate all the waifu cancer and the hard turn into so many cute Pokemon? I'm meh towards bara pokemon as well.
>>29136315
Doesn't this happen every other gen?
And feminine = waifumon? what?
So Pokemon was dead since gen 1 because it was filled with husbandomon?
>>29136687
>>29136731
Pallosand is literally just a sandcastle with two dots for eyes. It's quite literally the laziest pokemon design ever made.
Drampa just looks like an overly-cutesy piece of shit.
>>29136709
>i dont have an argument so i'll post a funny image with (you) xD
Why even respond if you don't have anything to say?
>>29136773
Maybe don't hate pokemon based solely on the people who like them?
>>29136822
No, Voltorb/Electrode, Ditto and some evolutions like Magneton are way lazier
>>29136822
>Pallosand is literally just a sandcastle with two dots for eyes.
>>29136822
Oh, I did make an argument. You said one feminine Pokemon, but as you can see, there are several.
>>29136664
>WHY ISN'T EVERYONE A FURFAG LIKE ME
>HOW DARE YOU ENJOY DESIGNS I CAN'T FAP TO
I'd like to be surprised but the Sanic reaction image says it all really.
>>29136664
>/vp/ is one person
>>29136822
>Drampa looks overly cutesy
It's meant to look comforting though, like a grampa
>>29136852
>LE BAIT xD
How about instead of blindly replying with funny image macros, you look at what I said and give me a real response. It's LITERALLY a stereotypical sandcastle with two dots for eyes. Google "clipart sandcastle" and you'll see what I mean.
>>29136840
Voltorb/Electrode are pokeballs with faces. That makes them SLIGHTLY more creative.
Ditto isn't based on anything in the real world, nor is Magneton.
Show me a single pokemon where the only defining feature that makes it a pokemon are two tiny circles. Even shit like Vanilluxe has a cone made of ice, which is fucking SOMETHING.
>>29136954
a pokeball with a face is lazy, and bubblegum with a smiley face to. the origins do not matter, seeing as you're ignoring palosand's
>>29136948
Yeah, and Tsareena is meant to look cute, therefore it shouldn't be shot down solely for that reason.
>>29136911
>UH, W-WAIFUFAG!!!
Wow, I bet you almost spend a whole second coming up with that brilliant response, huh?
>>29136927
I know /vp/ isn't all one person, I'm referring to the majority who think that way.
Outside rowlett and vikavolt I don't like a single one of these pokemon.
And Gen V is my favorite dex ever, so this is honestly shocking.
>>29137005
>Wow, I bet you almost spend a whole second coming up with that brilliant response, huh?
>literally no retort but stutterposting
>still gets it wrong
He didn't call you a waifufag, he called you a furfag, furfag. I know it's hard to concentrate with your dragon dildo in your ass but try to keep up.
>>29137005
Are you defending or attacking Drampa?
>>29136315
You mean all 4 of them introduced for this gen?
Yeah shit's a real pandemic
>>29136999
I'm not saying Voltorb, Electrode, Ditto, etc. aren't lazy. I like how everyone immediately assumes that "not liking some new pokemon" is the same as "genwunner". I'm saying that, compared to those pokemon, Pallosand is even worse, because it's so fucking generic and there's literally nothing to its design.
>B-BUT IT LURES PEOPLE AND EATS THEM WOAH
Yeah, because that totally isn't the same exact gimmick as almost every other ghost type pokemon.
>>29137046
I'm saying that if you consider Drampa to be good, you have no reason to hate Tsareena.
>>29137041
>xD le furries lmao you like a pokemon you're a furry
I'm only gonna bother giving you a response with as much thought put into it as yours.
>>29136664
>THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO BE UGLY
Said no one ever.
>>29137079
I'm not calling upu a genwunner, drop the persecution complex. I'm just saying that the sandcastle is not more lazy than Voltorb or Ditto. You say it's a sandcastle with eyes, but not all sandcastles look the same, so the design is unique, compared to a pokeball with eyes or a pink blob with a smiley face
I don't even like Palosand
>>29137110
I've heart the defense "It's supposed to be ugly/have poor anatomy/be boring/etc." countless times.
>>29137198
Google "clipart sandcastle". It's the most boring, generic design for a sandcastle you could make.
>two towers on the side
>square in the middle
>arched doorway
>arched windows
>thing on top
If you think Pallosand is unique, you've probably never seen a sandcastle in your life.
>>29137079
>I'm saying that if you consider Drampa to be good, you have no reason to hate Tsareena.
Kek. Drampa is designed as a friendly protector of children, which reflects in its dex entry. Tsareena, on the other hand, has a bit of a discordance between its design and dex entry. I can't think of a person who'd correlate its "defender of the realm" dex info with its "cutey pie" design.
That being said, I do like Tsareena, but it took me a bit to reconcile it's status as Madam Asskicker with its design.
>>29136315
>Is Pokemon dead?
Welcome to 2010
>>29137202
Well I haven't, but you have to be a special kind of stupid if you think that.Or, dare I say, underage.
>>29136822
nice try faggot
nothing could EVER be worse designed than faggot ice cream
>>29136315
Yeah, because kids REALLY love ultra-feminine 'Mons and DEFINITELY fap to them.
Fucking dumbass.
>>29137487
You think they don't? This dumbass is in denial that GF is otaku pandering.
>>29136315
It's growing up
>>29136664
>>29136822
>>29137079
>shitting on pokemon designs
A reminder to get a load of this and be grateful for what you have
>>29137698
go be a buzzkill elsewhere, yokai are based on yokai
>>29136333
>>29136822
>>29136900
>>29136911
>>29136999
>>29137077
>>29136315
>tfw Luchalitten is going to be the top bara husbandomon of Gen 7 by default due to having no competition
>>29136315
>All these faggots not liking waifumons
Is /vp/ filled with homosexuals ?
>>29136664
>one feminine pokemon
>poppmaid
>bruxish
>tsareena
>rimbombee
>lurantis
>magearna
morelull is the only hope for grass types this generation and I don't have faith in it at all.
>>29137487
These are the same people who designed Lopunny. Surely they're at least a LITTLE aware of what they're doing?
>>29137756
>not wanting to play with barbie dolls: pokemon edition makes you a faggot
when will this mongoloid meme ever end?
>>29137938
There's still Robinhoot, and how is Bruxish a waifumon in any way?
>>29136315
The bad Pokemon fans like you are being weeded out.
>>29137990
Faggot
>>29138025
Anything remotely feminine is a waifu in their eyes, even if it's accurate to reality.
>>29136406
And Jynx sucks as much as every furry and waifumon to follow it.