We 72 now boyzzz

File: 1476354613244.png (298KB, 418x394px) Image search: [Google]

298KB, 418x394px

>>29126273
>UB being Pokémon
Yeah, no.

>UB 03 to 05

Did I miss something?

>>29126304
>le UB not poke meme

>>29126322
yep, missed my dick in your mum vag

>>29126323
brilliant, what a fucking briliant discussion and input
Kill yourself OP. another thread died for this

>>29126323
>le GF won't change up things meme
Just because the past six generations had all the monsters be catchable doesn't mean the next six will follow the same route, patternfag.

Wow they already revealed every Pokemon

>>29126451
You even hear yourself?

>past six generations
>six generations
>six

>>29126273
Ub are not pokemon says nintendo.


And you have many fake evos on list.

>>29126566
source?

>>29126404
no. cuck

>>29126650
Offical sites bith in japanese and english. Theyre not listed as pokemon.


They're also anti-pokemon.

It's 62 new Pokemon not counting alolan forms or forms

>>29126273
There's also the inevitable dolphin and snowman Pokemon

You have made up evolutions you assume will happen but have no confirmation. Also UBs aren't Pokemon.

>>29126719
No, this is not a source. I asked for a source which says specifically UB are NOT pokemon.

There's no such thing.

This is all just to hype people with some kind of novelty. They'll be catchable and in dex.

Reshashed legends.

>>29126273
more. don't forget:
Turtonot's pre-evo(s)
and maybe a Minior Evo/Crabrawler pre-evo
and the monkeys pre-evo too.

How does it feel to know the entire dex ?

>>29126786
Fuck you're dumb lmao

>>29126786
Those fucking sites and corocoro say so.

Do you need a chink riddler to say it retard?

The gaudians are our legendary quartet this time around.

>>29126771
Posted a thread with this list literally yesterday.

Bounsweet, Cutiefly, Type:Null evos got confirmed today.

You know how stupid you look right now?

They're all confirmed.

If you believe Pikipek and starters won't have 3rd evos you're autistic.

>>29126833
Ok post it.

Post where is states that UB ARE NOT POKEMON.

We're waiting faglord.

>>29126451
I want them to be Pokemon. Go sit down and let me have dreams.

>>29126566
UB aren't Pokemon and Team Aether is the good guys says Nintendo!

File: simiderp.jpg (102KB, 640x626px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 640x626px

>Assuming Komala will evolve

>>29127106
>Assuming Bounsweet will evolve
>Assuming Cutiefly will evolve
>Assuming Type:Null will evolve
>Assuming
>Assuming
>Assuming
>Assuming
>Assuming

>>29126916
Retard theyre not.

>>29126273
1. Shouldn't the official count only have confirmed Pokemon and Pokemon we know to evolve from other Pokemon (ie Pikipek)?
2. UB's shouldn't be counted until we know their exact nature.

>>29127224
>Pokemon we know to evolve
Exacly what was posted.

>>29127169
Did you miss the connecting flight to your point?

>>29127259
>Komala
>Salandit
>Wimpod
>Morelull

When were their evo's confirmed again?

File: 1427749875884.jpg (53KB, 613x353px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 613x353px

>UBs at all when all signs point to them not being Pokemon
>UBs beyond Absorption and Beauty, when we have no idea how many of these fucks there could be
>Speculated evolutions for Pokemon that have not been confirmed at all (Wimpod, Salandit, etc). For all we know they evolve twice or could even have split evos or they don't evolve at all

>>29127276
Bounsweet, Cutiefly and Type: Null are all Pokemon people said weren't going to evolve

>>29127347
OK? So? They weren't confirmed then and are now. Neither is Komala evolving.

>>29127347
Well, clearly if some Pokemon that were said to not evolve ended up evolving then that necessitates that all Pokemon that were said to not evolve must then evolve. That's some flawless Mensa-level reasoning there.

>>29127346
Even the Riddler has UBs mixed in between Pokemon.

>>29127421
Who?

>adding three more UBs for no reason
>adding unfounded speculation as if it was confirmed
kill yourself

>>29127449

Newfag.

>>29127259
>>29127303

True, those Pokemon are more than likely going to evolve, but it hasn't been confirmed yet, so they shouldn't be put into the list yet.

>>29126869
We've known Pikipek and the starters will go to stage 3 because we've seen Pokedex entries showing progression to second and third ? entries for them. We have not seen anything like that for other speculated evolutions.

>>29127484
I've been here since the days of Latjo Lajban and /tr/. Sorry that I can't be bothered to keep up with the wheelings and dealings of every Game Theory-tier e-celeb to stay up to date with the latest totally legit leaks.

>>29127639
>trying this hard not to sound new
>justifying ignorance
>providing baseless speculation based on ignorance

kek

>>29127833
It's not on me to do your research or present your claims for you. If you're going to bring something up (in this case, whoever Riddler is and why they're significant), then it's on you to make sure everyone involved knows why they're pertinent. You cannot reasonably assume some obscure personality is common knowledge.

>>29128047
>Riddler
>Obscure

Yeah, I'm sure you're not new.

Also, you gotta do the pre-reading before you come to class, Mike.

>>29126451
All the monsters catchable ?
Like Ghost and Substitute ?

>>29126504
Kanto, Johto, Hoenn, Sinnoh, Unova, Kalos.

Count em.

>>29126273
>Including unconfirmed evolutions and assumptions
Kys

>>29128983
>He thinks Substitute counts as a monster.

Anti-UB morons are getting desperate.

Inb4 >muh movie props