>she likes Pokemon based on objects

>>28966085
>caring this much what Pokémon other people like

>>2896608
>Which animatronic do I look like
What she means with this?

>This person love this pokemon
>I hate it now

File: YesAnd.png (33KB, 106x188px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 106x188px

>>28966085
>she likes Pokemon based on objects
Are you trying to make some kind of point here, OP?

Or are you just blowing steam for the sake of it?

>>28966085
>animated pic of her is slim
>shes a rounded fatass

Typical

more like pokemon based on food

File: 1377325443320.png (232KB, 349x400px) Image search: [Google]

232KB, 349x400px

>>28966085
Are you gonna cry that someone likes something that you don't? Are you going to cry, anon? Like a little bitch?

>>28966085
>P-please give me attention but don't be mean about it...

>>28966085
>Which animatronic do I look like
I'd say the (hot air) Balloon Boy

>>28966085
>Which animatronic do I look like

Is this Pokemon or FNAF?

File: pokemon-magearna-1.jpg (141KB, 640x382px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 640x382px

>>28966085

I see no problem with that.

I love Magearna and all other Pokémon based off a object.

>>28966457
Astro Boy you fuckwit

>>28966457
Older than this

There is metaphorically nothing wrong with objectmon.

>>28966085
And what's wrong with that?

No, literally what's wrong with that? Are you trying to dismiss her opinion because of how she looks? Are you trying to say that Pokemon have a right way and a wrong way to be done?

Would you have attacked the person the same way if she were thinner and at an acceptable level of geeky to pass for a normie?

What is wrong with you?

my only grading factor for pokemon is art quality

>>28966564
I'm with you on that one. Unfortunately almost no one else does and, among those that do, you are brutally reminded that art is subjective.

>>28966481
>Magearna and all other Pokémon based off a object.
Do you mean Waifumons?