>he cares about post-game in a multiplayer series
>>28964380
>Multiplayer series
Fuck off.
>He plays competitive pokemon
fag
>>28964380
>he thinks a game having multiplayer is the same as being a multiplayer focused game
>>28964380
>he pays for the multiplayer, something he can do on his web browser for free
Really, Anon?
It's an RPG with multiplayer components.
A multiplayer game would have no single player content whatsoever, or a bland one.
>>28964444
Quads of the truth.
I don't have friends to battle
Battling random people gets boring
ITT: we all have fun the wrong way
>>28964444
But anon that's X and Y
Multiplayer dies eventually.
Hold up. I've been playing pokemon since it came to America. Does it really have multiplayer?
>>28964533
I totally expected this answer haha
the thing is, XY has actually quite a bit of content, it's just that it's plain boring and unintresting.
Do you remember the Promoclips you could do?
Or the photos you could make of yourself?
Or the Battle Chateau?
Or character customization?
Those are all features, even though they are bad or non-existant for us.
And thats still more than Gen 1 and 2 (although i admit it's a very low bar)
>>28964776
>battle Cheatue
You mean the place with level up sets? (On writs of challenges)
And when was character customization content? Is that Pokken's content too?
>>28964554
When a new game comes out maybe.
I still get consistent rando battles on Battle Spot with no wait times to this day
>>28964408
Do you battle the NPCs forever
>>28964380
>he buys pokemon when he can just use showdown
>>28965291
but if i just use showdown then my complaints can't ruin the game for those who care about single player content. where's the fun on that?
>>28964380
>he wants replayability in a video game