87.5% (Eighty-seven point five percent) Male
What's your point
>>28961993
brionne is hella gay and i love it
>>28961967
it's a trap!
>>28961967
So ?
>>28962011
I'm gay and i feel triggered by this statement, take it out
Also, is it just me, or does it look sad?
>>28961967
It will be changed most likely. For Delphox, it was understandable to have a male option but with Poppmaid, I think the ratio might be changed this time.
>>28961967
Braixen all over again. It doesn't matter tho, waifufags will soft reset until they get their Timid Female or some shit like this.
>>28961967
>This means that there aren't females
Anon is autistic shit, yet somehow 100% human. It can't be explained.
>artificial rarity
>87.5% (Eighty-seven point five percent) Male
Are you sure? Maybe in this gen this can change... think about that.
>>28961967
Peacocks are male too I don't give a shit. It's an animal.
>>28961967
>87.5% gay
What should matter is if the designs are good or not, not if they look too girly or manly.
>>28961967
Given how female oriented the design is I would not be surprised if they turn the gender ratio around
>>28962073
Why would they do that? They didn't even make gothitelle be 100% female.
87.5% (Eighty-Seven Point Five Percent) Male
You guys really can't seem to wrap your head around the idea that the 87.5% ratio is just there to keep starters rare and difficult to breed. Eevee gets the same ratio too.
It doesn't actually represent how masculine or feminine they're supposed to be.
>>28962153
Now that you mention it, Lillie does look pretty trap-like. Is she actually a slender twink with a thick feminine penis?
>>28961967
That percentage doesnt change the fact ill soft reset till female. If anything it will make me more excited to get a female cause I beat the odds.
Your percentages have no effect on me trapfags.
>>28962101
Yeah but no one cares or remembers Gen 5 Pokemon and this is an starter we're talking about
>>28962153
>implying /vp/ wouldn't still fuck it regardless
At least I know I still would.
I'd fug Braixen but not this ugly seal thing mang
shit starter
>>28962295
What
>>28962291
Said.
>>28962153
>dem hands
It's current year ffs, how can they still have so shitty graphics?
>>28962025
Of course it is
It's description on the website says that it only allows its sadness to show to people it fully trusts, and never lets its sad face be seen by anyone else
Which is just like people who overcompensate for their inner anguish by forcing a smile and unnaturally cheery persona
Why does everyone act like Braixen never happened?
>>28962574
Could it bedenialfags
[Citation Needed]
How do you know it won't be 87.5% female instead?
>>28962793
6 generations of pokemon say otherwise.
>>28962852
Six generations of pokemon also say there are gyms
>>28962852
Don't even bother anon. /vp/ is full of retarded autists that believe GF is going to change everything they have been doing for the past 6 generations just to cater their every dream
>>28962879
Yes, and it was proven that there won't be.
Until it's proven the gender ratio is different, it's better and smarter to assume the gender ratio will stay the same.
>>28962021
>poppmaid with lewd bedroom eyes
>>28962879
Fucking got him
>>28962892
Oh I agree, it's better bit too adding anything. Just pointing out flawed logic, sis
>>28962998
What did he mean by this?
>>28961967
>>28962526
Why does that make me so sad.
>>28962219
Anyways this.
>>28963015
It means I'm not paying attention and can't type. Better not to assume anything, I meant
>>28962245
>>Heavy breathing intensifies
>>28962073
I wouldn't be surprised if they switched the gender ratio either
frankly it's about fucking time
>>28962245
Lillie is just Gladion in a dress.
Is Ken Sugimori still designing pokemon? if so he or some other Jap may have forgot there is gender ratios, Japanese people seem to have bad long term memory while having a very reliable short therm memory.
>>28962245
>>28963139
wtf is this
>>28961967
>they think all males have to look more masculine than feminine
how's the stone age going for u