She is God of fakemons.

>>28755290
I want her to grab me like that and force her tongue down my throat.

God is real though

File: 1463492225050.gif (498KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

498KB, 500x500px

>>28755369
>God is real though

Source?

>>28755395
worst little witch desu

>>28755361
>her

File: 1471992225044.png (115KB, 248x251px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 248x251px

>>28755431
Yes, >her.
I want to impress her with my large harem

File: 1441789898604.png (182KB, 209x322px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 209x322px

>>28755369
>god is real though

>>28755290

She's fake Pokémon.

>>28755290
>reverse image search
you literally cannot make this shit up

File: The guy who wrote The Lion the Witch and the Wardrobe.jpg (1MB, 1250x1725px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1250x1725px

>>28755395
>>28755580
>implying
go read a book

File: snekeatsflygonfull.gif (3MB, 400x450px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 400x450px

>>28755369
God can't be real, this gif exists

File: 1472145975577.png (863KB, 753x637px) Image search: [Google]

863KB, 753x637px

>>28755660
>My giant old man in the sky is real though.
>You go get an education

File: Ludshig the Implier.png (532KB, 800x584px) Image search: [Google]

532KB, 800x584px

>>28755738
if you were actually educated you'd know why that's bullshit

>>28755702
>Implying this isn't proof that God exists and He has blessed us

File: 1473984250379.jpg (22KB, 493x549px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 493x549px

>>28755802
Explain it to me then if you're so smart.
How is your giant magical horrible father of a deity real?

File: image.jpg (242KB, 440x1100px) Image search: [Google]

242KB, 440x1100px

>>28755290

>>28755845
oh boy this will be good

File: image.jpg (197KB, 440x1100px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 440x1100px

>>28755850

>>28755868
continue

File: smug homer.jpg (23KB, 489x488px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 489x488px

>>28755845
Well let me start with asking why you don't believe in a God.
If it's just "lel I don't care" than you can fuck right off.
If it's "it's unscientific" than we can get this party started.

File: 6ZRJHlkj.png (268KB, 593x334px) Image search: [Google]

268KB, 593x334px

>>28755738
>madoka magica

File: Who would do this to happy sea lion clown.jpg (3MB, 4160x2336px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4160x2336px

>>28755850
>>28755868

I'm still waiting for part 3.

File: 1474747969108.png (132KB, 540x360px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 540x360px

>this thread

>>28755845
There has never been a single shred of evidence disproving the existence of God. Therefore, you can infer that the reason it is referenced and worshiped by so many cultures, is that it must be real.

File: 1474388054331.jpg (29KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 640x480px

>>28755926
It doesn't seem scientifically possible to me.

>>28755940
don't fucking start this shit, this thread is starting to get good

>>28755926
There is no evidence proving nor denying God's existence.

File: image.png (89KB, 480x280px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 480x280px

>>28755940
>Can't tell the difference between Madoka Magica and Dangan Ronpa

File: Untitled.png (31KB, 535x598px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 535x598px

>>28755868
>>28755946

Here you go, I just drew it.

File: 353564643.jpg (10KB, 247x252px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 247x252px

>>28755940
>Steven universe

File: 1462992039047.jpg (429KB, 694x900px) Image search: [Google]

429KB, 694x900px

>>28755948
you could have the same logic for roothoot and co. and other fakes. My opinion on such things is fake until proven real

File: image.png (29KB, 677x268px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 677x268px

>>28755290
This is for real anons

File: 286eac9f6077dc45fc37ce821b2ffb73ce18b4bb_full.jpg (6KB, 184x184px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 184x184px

>>28755974
>Arthur Fonzarelli

>>28755971
so tell me, how's your first week on /vp/ been?

File: image.jpg (24KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 600x600px

>>28755948
>Implying Hinduism's deities are the same as the Christian God
>Implying Native American, African, and Polynesian religion is the same as a Christian God
>Implying Buddhists accept the existence of a God

File: 1470784525486.jpg (31KB, 600x462px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 600x462px

>>28755951
So you think it doesn't fall in line with the Scientific Method, i.e., you cannot prove it with an Experiment? (Test, Control, Objective Observer)

this seems stupid right now but it will be important

>>28755963

I don't know if a deity exists, but I do KNOW the Abrahamic male deity doesn't exist, for He is an illogical concept, rife with contradiction - a square circle of loving wrath, known to have gone through an evolution as He was compiled by the ancients throughout history.

File: 1473108943333.png (245KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 640x480px

>>28755948
>Therefore, you can infer that the reason it is referenced and worshiped by so many cultures, is that it must be real.
Only crazy people have this mindset.

File: image.jpg (147KB, 433x480px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 433x480px

>>28755986
>religion wars on /vp/
>tie it into pokemon so mods technically can't delete
fucking kek

>>28755971
welcome to 4chan, this is a common way for people to derail threads, they respond to a reaction pic with a reaction pic and states that the previous reaction pic is from a different show than it is actually from. I am actually a huge fan of dangan ronpa, I just recognized this thread as shit and I wanted to derail it in my favorite way.

I still can't get over the fact that Kirigiri died

>>28755986
>Liking Copyrighted abomination
Leave right now.

File: 1462153714089.jpg (92KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 1280x720px

>>28756030
Which god do you believe in anon?
>So you think it doesn't fall in line with the Scientific Method, i.e., you cannot prove it with an Experiment? (Test, Control, Objective Observer)
Yes.

>>28755948
Ok, but some gods are old men. Some gods are young women. Some gods are animals. One god is a dragon god of magic with multiple heads.

Is your god a multi-headed dragon god?

File: Azelf edit.png (688KB, 1280x1280px) Image search: [Google]

688KB, 1280x1280px

>>28755290
>She is God

>>28756092
>>28755994

>>28756084
The only god is Arceus

>>28756030
It literally doesn't. A theory that is not falsifiable and can't be disproven is not scientific. We can not prove that gOD doesn't real, therefore the belief that he exists is entirely unscientific.

File: 1463034265661.jpg (27KB, 419x304px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 419x304px

>>28756076
I'm Catholic myself, but the reasons are admittedly cynical as you'll see.

So you don't believe in God (and I'll assume anything else "Supernatural) because it cannot be proven with an experiment. However, the Scientific Method itself is based on the idea that there IS something Supernatural, as otherwise our thoughts would simply be random acts of chemicals in our brains and, therefor, couldn't be Objective in that sense.

File: pokemon-sun-moon-tapu-koko-kokeko-3(1).jpg (89KB, 680x401px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 680x401px

>>28756124

I doubt that.

File: 260.jpg (28KB, 260x347px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 260x347px

>mfw this thread

>>28755290
>reverse search showed some barneyfag pictures
You belong in >>>/mlp/.

File: 1462163142043.png (177KB, 664x520px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 664x520px

>>28756164
If God is real, then why does evil exist?

File: image.jpg (73KB, 960x702px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 960x702px

>>28755996
>family guy

>>28756164
Science can not prove or disprove of certain phenomena, such as the questions on what the meaning of life is or where all life came from. Questions like those outside of the scope of science - they are unscientific.

The theory that a god exists is one of those things that lies outside of that scope. It is not scientific by the very definition of the word.

If (You) were actually educated (You) would know why what (You) are saying is bullshit. It's philosophy of science 101.

File: 4c2c6619391b056fcef9761784f213a5_400x400.jpg (31KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 400x400px

>>28756282
>mario

File: 5053225.jpg (16KB, 383x299px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 383x299px

>>28756185
have my (You)
>>28756273
Read Augustine, Thomas Aquinas, and literally anyone else. In fact, most of the stuff I'm saying is regurgitation of them and Lewis, who also borrowed heavily from them.
tl;dr you're definition of what "evil" is is wrong.

>>28756220
?
It's full of DBZ Super.

>>28756366
I'm sorry, maybe I put that the wrong way
basiclly
>God can't exist because his existence is unscientific
>>well science is based on this unscientific thing, and without it science can't exist
>>therefor, just because something is unscientific doesn't mean it doesn't exist

>>28755395
Who let the plebbitor in?

>>28756164
And why exactly do thoughts need to adhere to your random definition of objective (which is capitalized, oddly; are you talking about the Platonic ideal or what?) for humans to be able to record observations?

>>28755290
I don't like this thing, but this is probably my favorite fanart of it

so far, at least

>>28756392
>you're(sic) definition of what "evil" is is wrong
Elaborate, anon.

>>28756431
Science is not based on something unscientific, not sure where you are getting this from.... unless you are somehow interpreting the fact that us, who came up with science, do not understand where we as living beings came from and therefore science is unscientific, which would be a pretty bad misinterpretatation and missing the point pretty damn hard.

The short story is: Science exists as a convenient way for us to determine whether we think something is true or not. Exagtly what science entails has different between different times in history -- in the past people might have thought that there was scientific evidence that a god exists because that's what their "science" looked like. Our current, modern view of "science" has been formulated in such a way that if something can't be disproven, it's not scientific, and therefore the belief in the existence of a god is not scientific.

This doesn't mean that a god doesn't exist from a universal, objective viewpoint (one that we as a species will never attain), but from the viewpoint that we have agreed is "science", it doesn't.

So I'd suggest you'd stop pretending your belief in a god has some sort of scientific basic when it by the very definition of the word science doesn't.

>>28756491
Don't ask me, ask the people who invented Science.
By Objective, I mean completely unbiased. You know that funny edit of that Mickey Mouse strip where he says "Hypocrite that you are, for you trust the chemicals in your brain to tell you they are chemicals"? that's basically my argument

>>28756646
But humans can not and will never be able to reach some sort of "objective and unbiased" truth in the universe, therefore there is no value in discussing things from that perspective as neither you nor me nor anyone understands it. Science is the closest thing we have and it's what we will have to go by whether you like it or not.

Someone screencap this please

>>28756756
I mean, nobody will ever be completely unbiased, just like there will always be a variable in the experiment you didn't think of, but you have to assume that it is hypothetically possible for anything Science to properly function.

>>28756028
>being stupid

>>28756883
>>28756883
now I note that this does not necessarily prove the existence of God, you could always turn your back on Science, or just say that you still don't think God is real for other logical, but this is where I use Occam's razer. The existence of God gives a lot of problems in the universe a more Elegant solution

>>28756404
same shit

File: tumblr_odgn0p4tzG1vahikuo1_1280.png (35KB, 176x194px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 176x194px

>>28755369
>God is real though

File: image.jpg (66KB, 750x638px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 750x638px

>>28756646
>invented science

>>28756968
The guy who started this and most people for that matter probably have lost interest at this point, but what the hell, the thread's dead anyway and my autism is tingling.
Super tl;dr, I narrow down the possible religions to be Judaism , Christianity, Bhudism and Hinduism.
Buddhism and Hinduism are possible, but If they are and I'm not a Buddhist or Hindu I'll just get reincarnated.
Judaism is possible, but I wasn't born a kike so I don't get shit

>>28756883
whether or not "anything is possible" is true or not is completely irrelevant and has nothing to do with whether science properly functions or not. Just like >>28756491 said, why do you think we need to know why we are to be able to record observations?

>>28756968
The point is that you started off by telling people to "read a book" only to show that you have absolutely fuck all understanding of what you're talking about. You can think god is real for whatever reason you want and it doesn't affect anyone, but you should definitely have grasped that to a mankind that uses science as a tool to answer questions, it does not.

>>28757139
You don't understand why anything I said is actually important, so there's nothing I can do. It probably seems like I'm a retard who bit off more than he could chew and got BTFO, and I'm fine with random faggots on the internet thinking that. if anyone's making that screencap >>28756814 requested, make sure to include some sort of smug pepe next to me getting de_stroyed

>>28756968
The scientific method isn't a religion you fucking idiot. It's more elegant to say a god did something, but that doesn't make it true.

The most logical place to use "a god did it" is for creation, but then who created the god? It's an infinite loop. So the real Occam's razor is that existence just is how it is.

>>28755946
Part 3 was never got posted after one of the ballio threads ended

>>28756273
God wanted humanity to have free will, so just removing all ability to commit evil would have made us all naught but mere toys. Lucifer was the one that thought of making humans incapable of committing evil.

>>28755290
>she

File: 1252029897259.jpg (46KB, 800x573px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 800x573px

>>28756164
>However, the Scientific Method itself is based on the idea that there IS something Supernatural, as otherwise our thoughts would simply be random acts of chemicals in our brains and, therefor, couldn't be Objective in that sense.

>>28757776
Off by one, but is her.

>>28757678
Then what of natural evil such as plagues or cancer in children?

>>28758545
le ebin Steven "Universe" Fry

this thread is in complete chaos

>>28758596
Huh?

File: 1474744885207.png (25KB, 330x173px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 330x173px

>>28755994