Discuss this

>>28571540
I dont trust the video. It's shady af. Has GF ever promoted a fighting type that's not a starter nor lucario to be a competitive powerhouse?

I mean I like Crabrawler but I want to see if we have other options first. Bewear need not apply

Why the fuck did you make a second thread about this

Sage

File: HNI_0019.jpg (65KB, 480x411px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 480x411px

>>28571540
This made me hype as shit for Crabrawler, even if it is probably 'faked'.

>>28571540
It's a crustacean so that means itll be slow, it at least better be really bulky

>>28571830
I am not that OP, I am the new, unoriginal OP

Why are they also showing it with Dynamic Punch?

>Could X be OU material?
Technically the answer to this question is Yes for all currently unreleased mons, because we still don't know much about them. If GF are stupid enough to leave their stat spreads and movepools lying around in the demo to be datamined we'll be able to more correctly assess their usefulness, either by comparing them to already existing Pokemon or deciding if they fill a new sought-after niche. Until then these threads are just pointless speculation, usually done by shitters not knowing much about the meta in the first place.

>>28571540
Like hell it's going to beat Talonflame 1 on 1.

Not long ago I read that a pure type wouldn't be on OU.

I disagree.
I think that, with the proper stats and movepool, this thing could be amazing.

>>28572149
>Not long ago I read that a pure type wouldn't be on OU
Who said that? OU is full of single type Pokemon.

>Kangaskhan
Any decent fighting type can ohko this
>ferrothorn
easy to take down
>talonflame
stone edge kills it easy if any decent fighting type is given a chance


Really this looks like overhyping

>>28572225
If it can OHKO Cresselia with a non-stab move it really is impressive.

>>28572149
Lol what is clefable

Who even said that

>>28571540
The only concrete thing we know about it are its abilities. Which are... not great. Either they buff Iron Fist, or it gets a cool HA, or it'll need REALLY good stats. I love the guy but I'm a bit pessimistic

>>28571540
I want one now, hopefully it's shiny is good.

>>28572261
Yea but what's it take to do that? 160 attack and 30 on everything else

>>28571540

It's probably going to be high attack, high speed, good HP (stamina), decent defense, low everything else.

>>28572565
>low everything else
so...special stats?

let's hope it descends into the depths of NU so no one has to look at this piece of shit