Ultimate BTFO poll

>>28466948
When you say split-evolutions are real, do you refer specifically to the Starters?

>>28466998
Yeah he does.

Did you mean new megas, or just megas in general?

Obviously all of the old megas will be returning

>>28467043
I voted wrong then. It only occured to me afterwards. Oh well.

>>28467115
>returning
The return of megas in general. New ones may be possible, but thats something different and not part of the poll.

>>28467115
There are a small but loud band of autists who think that Megas will actually be removed.

>>28466998
OP here
1-Yeah I mean the starters having a split evolution
2-Megas returning in general, not necessarily new ones

I could've included more options like "are UB catchable/megas are returning but there no new megas", but then it would've been a clusterfuck

>>28467187
They're baiting memers just like people trying to debunk the leaked starter evos with stuff like "A-Ashs hat a-and shit furry designs m-muh starter chimera theory". Not liking the leaks or having some scepticism is good, but trying to hardcore debunk them with nearly no evidence is just autistic and fishing for replies.

>>28467291
You should have been more specific in your post.

>>28466948
Can you change "split evo" to alternative forms? The distinction is important in this argument.

>>28467503
Can I even edit a poll that's already been posted?

>>28467503
Anyway for those who haven't already voted, pretend the two options "starters only have one form and a single final evolution" and "the starters either have different forms and/or there's more than one evolution"