What do you think of Sandygast and its evolution?
>>28275351
Kinda looks like a Ragnarok Online mob for me.
>>28275351
Sandygast is good
Passoland is bad
>>28275351
haha
>>28275351
Palossand would look better without the shovel, it looks good on Sandygast though.
>>28275351
I love it
>>28275351
It's garbage.
Just like every Gen 7 mon till yet.
>>28275981
>Guaranteed comments
>>28275351
I don't really mind it.
I don't think it's a good design, but I don't think it shouldn't exist.
I like sandygast, but not what it evolves in to.
>>28275351
Sandygast is nice and pretty cute.
Palossand is serviceable in my opinion, but could be better.
>>28275351
It's great and I love it
>>28275351
Not a fan of either of them
>>28275581
>>28277049
Pretty much.
Sandyghast has a lot of cool visual references in its favor, like its sheet ghost body shape and the shovel sticking out of its head like a dead mon. If you were going to make a sandcastle ghost there's no better way.
It's kinda cool that the shovel became a radar but its not as visually appealing or as clever.
I reminds me of pic related, my favorite boss in BN3
Would prefer if they ditched the shovel. It looks OK on Sandyghast but just doesn't look right on Palossand. Also, get rid of the random seashells or whatever, they're a little too much.
I want to like it but those two details put me off.
I like it and I think it doesn't deserve the hate it gets. It's a fun clever way to make a haunted castle Pokémon without making it a sentient building.
They are the best Pokemon so far imo