Rockaby and co.

>>28126182
First off, drawman was drawing from memory, and he said the details were not exact.

Second, that pic was already proven fake.

>>28126223
With the name shadows, right?

>>28126182
The Rockaby "leak" just kind of exists and we should wait to see if it plays out or not.

I'd like it to be real because it's a cool idea for a Rock/Ghost type and a nice design, plus it's always good to have more ghost types especially if we're getting Oricorio, Sandygast, Mimikyu, Rockaby and the Chink leak's Ice/Ghost. Some of the other designs like Rockruff's evo and Bugorilla are cool too, the flower thing I still don't understand.

Though if Bugorilla is real then is it or it's prevo the Chink leak's "Rugby Monkey"?

File: 1472302751441.gif (2MB, 410x230px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 410x230px

Refer to >>28126223

>>28126244
Yes.

>>28126283
And then people went into older trailers and found that the lettering was really inconsistent throughout different trailers

>>28126301
Yes, but there was always the shading on the letters, at least a little bit. The Rockaby leak did not have them, which is a clear sign of a fake leak.

>>28126223
Forgot to mention I know he said the details were not exact- that's why I circled the differences; if someone was doing a piggyback fake, like that Rowlet2 "screenshot" from a while back, they might not remember to change details.
>>28126272
The flower thing is weird, but it's just the kind of weird I would expect GF to pull- it's a gatling gun flower with wonky proportions. I don't think the spider monkey would be related to the rugby monkey, because there'd have to be some pretty big thematic leaps, but there could be some translation errors.

>>28126182
Can anyone tell me where this came from?

I must have missed it when it was first posted. Assuming fake but I really like it actually.

File: synchrowaifu.jpg (311KB, 1207x452px) Image search: [Google]

311KB, 1207x452px

>>28126382

dude... what if that riddle with the philosopher statue was this pokemon?

Just a statue pokemon? with some dead philosopher? That would be neat. Did they give a dex description or something?

>>28126382
I drew, then I satrted shitposting on /vp/, and other anon made the right picture

http://imgur.com/a/LlEOG

>>28126451
>>28126486

I see, thank you.

File: dude.jpg (16KB, 342x342px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 342x342px

>>28126471
DUDE

I'm so glad we'll know for sure with coro coro if this guy was bullshitting. His drawings look legit enough but I don't want to be kept in suspense.

>>28126471
It's apparently based on the idea that taking rocks from Hawaii as souvenirs will leave you with a curse of misfortune. While making the OP image, I realized that it's supposed to look like a bobblehead to complete the "cursed souvenir" theme.
>>28126451
Yeah, this is what sold me on this leak. It makes sense- the anime likes teasing things for the upcoming games- and it explains, like Artleaka said, why all the starter finals are "humanoids with tufts of hair or feathers on their heads".

>>28126486
Bait, probably. I don't think a shitposter would A) keep it going for so long and B) come back later to give more leaks.
>>28126542
There's usually a trailer near the beginning of the month, too.

>>28126451
>>28126521
Well I don't like the leaked starter evos and I'm not sure about that rockruff evo either, so if it's true I won't even use synchro I guess.

File: baby.jpg (25KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 480x360px

>>28126573
it was never my intention to keep it for so long
also, I didn't come back for more leaks
I only posted the crying rock baby
the concept was from goron elder son,
that crying baby from majora's mask

>>28126640
>Pretending to be artleaka
>Not actually knowing about artleaka

>>28126640
Okay, so you aren't Artleaka then. Got it.

File: Don't talk to me or my son ever again.png (121KB, 402x242px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 402x242px

>>28126626
>don't using a customized personal waifu

>>28126676
no
>>28126683
pretty much

>>28126223
>Second, that pic was already proven fake.
Where?

We don't know if it's real or fake.

It's better to keep it in memory but ignore it for now until and if, it gets validation.

>>28126701
Hey, kudos for giving up the ruse before this got crazy. You're a good guy, fake Artleaka.

>>28126722
>We don't know if it's real or fake.
/vp/ really will fall for anything, huh?

>>28126722
Pretty sure the reason it was deemed fake was there was no shadow on the name. It's kind of strange to me that nothing else seems to be wrong, though.

>>28126791
Chinese leak is real, real leak leaks is likely real, start leak is real.

We've had real leaks, it's better to be suspicious than outright denying things unless they're flat out obviously bullshit like claims of 120+ new mons.

>>28126791
I, for one, feel like Artleaka's leaks and the designs he posted were probably too well thought out to be fake, like Rockaby being a tiki doll and a cursed bobblehead, plus his explanation of Synchro fitting too well with the starter leaks. But you do you. Who knows, maybe I'll be BTFOd on the first.

>>28126725
thanks, pal

>>28126955
This was a nice conversation.
Anyway, what do you think about the real Artleaka?

>>28126845
Jumping to a lot of conclusions, are we.

>>28126182
Does anybody have a collection of all of Artleaka's work? I think I missed out on some of them.

>>28126893
>people falling for fake leaks based on fake leaks

>>28127449
>>28127471
>>28127502
You okay there, buddy?

>>28127486
http://imgur.com/a/LlEOG

>>28127486
Look in this thread, retarded.

>>28126521
>>28127559
>LlEOG
>LIE
confirmed fake

>>28127559
Thanks anon.

>i-it's real until proven fake!
Every thread

>>28127528

>>people falling for fake leaks based on fake leaks
>people falling for fake leaks based on fake leaks based on fake leaks
>people falling for fake leaks based on fake leaks based on fake leaks based on fake leaks

>>28127896
It's "Shrug who knows" until proven real or fake

>>28127896
More like it's unknown until proven real or fake.

has anyone got artleaka stuff capped? This is the first I'm hearing it and I like the ideas with the customisation.

Was there a pic with the gorrils, because i havent seen it and would like to.

>>28127987
>>28127998
If you could just read up a little that would be nice
>>28127559

I really like some of the stuff this leaker says but really hate some of the other stuff he says. How can I deal with this conflicted feeling?

>>28128036
I saw that as soon as I posted. Thanks that guy.

File: image.jpg (309KB, 750x957px) Image search: [Google]

309KB, 750x957px

I actually find the lava pig to be the most interesting from that set of leaks. I was looking at it more closely and thinking about it, I came up with an idea.


Could that lava pig be based on Pele, the Hawaiian volcano goddess? Its body shape is similar to a volcanic mountain overflowing with lava, and it has the same hairstyle and flower headdress. Game Freak does look to mythology for inspiration, and since Alola is based on Hawaii, I suppose it's only fitting that the designers look at Hawaiian mythology.

Artleaka said it's a totem Pokemon as well, so it's kind of fitting for a Pokemon based on such a prominent deity in Hawaiian mythology. I wouldn't be surprised if it was encountered on the island with an active volcano.

File: image.jpg (140KB, 1126x868px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 1126x868px

>>28129536
It might seem disrespectful that Pele gets a Pokemon design based on a pig. However, one of the Hawaiian deities associated with Pele is Kamapua'a, the Hawaiian pig god. Apparently Kamapua'a was Pele's lover and rival.

Now, I'm still not sure if I'm truly convicted by these leaks, but if they are true, I can see how their designs are plausible for a Pokemon game. It is fairly in line with how Game Freak designs Pokemon.

If anything, I hope it's real. I'd be disappointed in Rockruff's evo but I'll gladly exchange it for this lava pig. I want it on my team!

File: 1472092620029.jpg (107KB, 648x968px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 648x968px

>>28129536
>that based mythology

Pig looks like the strange souvenir but I don't have pic saved though

>>28126451
Is this from the Art-Leaker? Was this in the original thread?

Is there a link for the post with this image in?

>>28130562
see >>28127563

>>28127479
Is it really that hard to have an open mind for you ?

>>28127896
That's how leaks work, anon

>>28130650
This isn't "keeping an open mind". It's "having no sense of basic scepticism at all, to a comical extreme".
You'd let yourself be fooled by a crayon drawing.

>>28129536
>>28129574
All I'm saying is, whoever Artleaks was, they either really did had inside info or they were one of the most informed fake leakers we've had on this entire board.

>>28126845
>>28130650
Technically, we don't know the Chinese leaks are real. The only reason they seem to be is that Mallow detail. Any and all leaks ought to be treated with suspicion until we get more information or something else that corroborates the leak in question.

It's fine to play along, but to seriously entertain every one that comes across our plate is ridiculous.

>>28129536
t. artleaka

Planting the seeds.

>>28130723
>It's fine to play along
So what you're saying is that it's okay to be an idiot, as long as you say "I never actually fell for it" after it's been debunked. Oh yeah, that makes sense.

>>28130694
There comes a point where being skeptical becomes ridiculous, like being skeptical of the starter leaks.

>muh scrapped designs
That's not skepticism, that's making some HUGE assumptions in order to make the leaks fit a certain narrative.

>>28130751
We're not talking about the starters though, we're talking about this piece of crap. Don't use that as an excuse for swallowing everything.

>>28130723
We do know they're real because of Mallow anon. If you want to make a mental leap and think they are scrapped designs fine, but you can't reasonably deny theyre real, leaked material.

>>28130745
>no fun allowed
No, I'm saying it's okay to entertain yourself when waiting for news. I'm sorry leaks are super serious business to you.

>>28126182
Is this a new pokemon?

>>28130764
I used the starters as an example. My point still stands.

>>28130751
>huge assumptions
Like what exactly? That companies do mock-ups of multiple concepts when developing a product? Sounds like a safe presumption to me.

I'm not a denialfag, but the arguments that they're not finalized designes aren't unreasonable.

>>28130776
>>28130796

>if one leak is real, they're ALL real

Wow, you're definitely an adult. Very convincing.

>>28130791
Read the thread and stop being a gargantuan faggot. Stop posting entirely until you learn how to do this.

>>28130796
No, you're just making the same weird arguments that you're accusing others of doing.

>>28130807
Never implied that at all.

>>28130807
>Strawmanning this hard
Here's your (You)

It's a good thing the leak believers all live with their parents, because they wouldn't survive a day out in the real world of they're this gullible.

>>28130817
There are a lot of people in this thread anon. Look around

>>28130803
Yes, because there isn't a single reason to believe it is a scrapped design, and there are plenty to believe they aren't scrapped designs.

File: image.jpg (39KB, 801x720px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 801x720px

I don't know mate, two different sources catching very similar things?
I'll wait until that other leak that managed to get Sandyghast and Pukimuku right and see it they end up connecting.

Till then, I'm starting to buy it.

>"I'm keeping an open mind, but it can't possibly be fake"
Like pottery.

>believe starter leaks
>people assume I believe every leak out there
I don't believe this one to be frank, at least not the right image.

>>28126955
>>28127027
now kiss

This is confirmed 100% real. Just wait a couple days.

>>28126521
>krakatuga
Too good to be true...damn...

Post what you like and dislike about the leak

Like:
>all alolan forms
>poke ride minigames
>the way synchro works

Dislike:
>that flower mon looks weird
>lava pig

File: 1386034479583.jpg (8KB, 246x291px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 246x291px

>>28129574
I CAN'T UNSEE IT BEING PIZZA

File: ArtLeakaTotal1.jpg (155KB, 591x1023px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 591x1023px

>>28127987

>>28131076
I hope I can have both Arcanines on my team

File: 1472032620561.jpg (73KB, 792x442px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 792x442px

>>28131076
You're missing the pea shooter.

Also:
>Bounsweet evolving into a Dragon
This is so ridiculous, I want it because Dragon Fruit.

>>28130860
>I don't know mate, two different sources catching very similar things?
of course, it's literally not possible that the right image was just someone who saw the artleaker fakes and tried to piggyback off them you fucking moron

>>28127903
>based on a fake game

>>28130723
There's far more to the Chinese leak being legit other than just Mallow, you fuckwit.

>>28131082
You can't, because this one is fake. There's no Alolan Arcanine. Sorry.

>>28131523
/thread

>>28131523
It's part of the Chinese leak, so you can't actually say that definitively.

>>28131569
Stop samefagging to /thread your own post, faggot.

>>28131822
It's not, it's from someone else who copied the Chinese leak and added on some extra details of their own.

>>28131902
Water Growlithe/Arcanine is from the leak, retard.

>>28131910
From the "additional" (fake) leak, yes, but not from the original Chinese one.

>>28127934
>>28127940
Most of the time it's "this is clearly fake" until proven fake.

>>28130810
says the faggot

>>28129574
>It is fairly in line with how Game Freak designs Pokemon.
Why do people keep using this reasoning as evidence of legitimacy? If GF can come up with a concept, a nobody on the internet can too.

>>28131929
That additional "fake" leak got Oricorio correct, though, as well as Alola Forms. The only pieces of wrong info that we know of from that leak are the typing of Alolan Ninetales and Gumshoos' isn't fat.

File: image.jpg (1MB, 1800x4000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1800x4000px

>>28130650
The problem with having an open mind is that people will try to fill it with garbage.

>>28131910
No they're separate leaks, retard.

>>28131076
I just want to know what's with the second pig evo. Like the hair ruins it.

>>28131988
>no u
ebin :^)

>>28132046
And the Growlithe line having Alolan forms in the first place, is another thing they got wrong. The official Japanese site confirms they don't.

>>28132132
While that is a possibility, the site says "stay tuned for more information on these familiar Pokemon" which could imply either way.

>>28131076
My primary complaint about aloalan arcanine is that it really ought to have a more floppy eared retriver look. If they're going to make a water dog pokemon they really should have based it on the most popular breed of real life water dog.

>>28131076
Why do you think this leak is real?

>>28132174
It also gives the in-game Pokédex entries for them, which are basically just the same old entries these Pokémon always had. You'd think the Pokémon with Alolan forms would get new ones, no? Besides, if they did have Alolan forms, GF would just reveal those rather than tease "Hey these Pokémon are getting Alolan forms, bet you can't wait to see them :-)"
I'm not saying there isn't *something* special about the Pokémon they're listing here, but it's not Alolan forms.

>>28131076
>Solrock/Lunatone forms
Holy shit antonio refresco leak was right?

The only plausible Artleaka Pokémon are Krakatuga and Alolan Muk.

The whole thing is fake. There is not one shred of proof that he's being honest. It's just a drawfag with too much time on his hands.

Keep living in Lalaland though, if it entertains your 'tism enough.

>>28126182
where did the pic on the right come from?

>>28132256
You literally have no proof that they aren't Alolan forms. GameFreak/TCPi hasn't revealed all of them yet, and they've revealed the ones so far in groups, so it's not a stretch to imagine that they might not have revealed them yet but have hinted at them.

Anyway, the site does not confirm they don't exist. It only confirms that the regular forms are in the games. That's it. Stop being a colossal faggot by trying to "debunk" Alolan Growlithe/Arcanine. You have nothing to disprove them without a shadow of a doubt.

File: image.jpg (117KB, 922x635px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 922x635px

It is fake. Not only did they say here would only be 4 totem Pokemon, they also showed off the water starter which is definitely going to be airborne in one way, shape, or form. Pic related. Look at the pokedex to the right and the placement of the starters

>>28133220
>the water starter which is definitely going to be airborne
Or maybe standing up, or jumping...

>>28133259
But still. No leaks so far hav shown the water starter in that capacity

>>28133220
>the water starter being airborn
That's the most ludicrous thing I've heard. How can a sea lion turn airborn ? What ? It becomes Water/Flying ? The placement of the pokeballs is only to fit the entire line in that space. That's it.

>>28133272
I mean, Pokedex shows the Pokemons in action poses, like Rowlet flying for example.
I'm not defending Artleaka, even though his threads was really entertaining. But that slot could fit his concept of the evolution, it's slim and would look kinda tall if it was standing up or doing a headstand. So the dex slots wouldn'tt really debunk that

>>28133150
I'll admit there's no ~ultimate concrete 100% definitive evidence~, but there's definitely more evidence pointing to them NOT being Alolan forms than there is for them being that.

>>28133294
As in jumping or something like that

>>28133304
The water starter is the mermaid and as he concept shows, it can be standing up so it would fit

>>28133220
WTF you talking about? The guy drew the middle evo and "confirmed" the final evos are the ones we've already seen. They fit in that Pokedex image just fine.

>>28133336
>The water starter is the mermaid and as he concept shows, it can be standing up so it would fit
I know but anon was talking about the second stage being airborn due to his pokeball being higher than the other

>>28133350
I'm not talking about the "final evolutions". Those are real. I'm saying Artleaker is fake

>>28133378
Well what did you mean by
>definitely going to be airborne in one way
?? Neither Poppmaid nor the one he drew look like they would be airborne.

>>28133220
Is 13 supposed to be Pykumuku?

Also, didn't artleaka say it was acrobat?

File: waterrs.png (48KB, 198x119px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 198x119px

>>28133220
I don't think it's placed like that because it'll be airborne, it's just to fit with the third stage taking up a lot of space at the bottom

File: hum.png (203KB, 396x237px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 396x237px

>>28133467
Personally I was thinking it would be like this

>>28133467
3rd stage can be standing up though

>>28133314
Perhaps, but there's no concrete evidence, so stating it's a fact when it's not is just being purely ignorant faggot.

>>28127559

>water arcanine

why do people believe this again?

>>28133531
>>28133533
Could be, just saying this is how I see it. Either way my point is there's no real reason to think it's going to be airborne.

>>28133605
It was in the leak that leaked Oricorio and Alola Forms.

>>28133628

We already know Arcanine isn't getting shit

>>28133628
And got Alolan Ninetails typing wrong so we can't really say if it's just luck or if the guy was legit but has alzeihmer, you can't possibly think a blue Ninetails could be fire type

>>28133593
Fair enough, it's just kind of sad to see people so desperately clinging to the idea when it's most likely not going to happen. But sure, you can keep hoping, sorry to be in your way.
(By the way, using homophobic slurs won't make people take you more seriously, if anything they do the exact opposite. Just a general tip for the future.)

>>28133741
>(By the way, using homophobic slurs won't make people take you more seriously, if anything they do the exact opposite. Just a general tip for the future.)
Fuck off to tumblr you limp wristed faggot.

>>28133801
I mean, this applies literally anywhere other than 4chan, but okay.

>>28126573
>I don't think a shitposter would A) keep it going for so long and B) come back later to give more leaks.
A) Yes, yes they would.
B) No real leaker leaks more than once, it's way too risky. Only shitposters carving attention do such things.

>>28133827
>thinking people write/speak like they do on 4chan elsewhere
are you autistic?

>>28133916
>thinking people don't
Have you never been outside 4chan?

>>28131076
Solrock and Lunatone look baller

Fake as shit though

File: IMG_3072.jpg (331KB, 3816x2484px) Image search: [Google]

331KB, 3816x2484px

>>28133531
>>28133624
When I first saw this I thought that poplin would be on some sort of bubble or ball and balancing

>>28134059
That could be neat, but also seems a little pointless since they'll get rid of it for the third evo.

>>28126699
>self inserting as the male MC
>not playing as the female for cute butt and better clothing options