>Take a plant >Make it another Grass type Pokemon Gamefreak pls

>implying mushrooms are plants

>>27787784
Mushrooms are plants.

>>27787767
>implying every new pokemon has to have an interesting typing

>>27787811

They aren't.

>>27787811
They're completely unrelated. Comparing fungi to plants makes about as much sense as comparing fungi to humans.

File: 1469735280860.png (213KB, 826x676px) Image search: [Google]

213KB, 826x676px

>>27787767
>Mushroom
>Plant

>Grass/Fairy
>Spore
All it needs is Rage Powder now.

>>27787767
>Take a bird
>Make it another Flying type Pokemon

GF pls

>>27787811
Someone failed fourth grade biology.

>>27787828
Fungi are closer related to humans than plants since they breathe in oxygen and out carbon.

File: Matango.png (277KB, 300x371px) Image search: [Google]

277KB, 300x371px

>>27787828
?

>>27787853
I know, I was just trying to explain it in a way that would make sense to a retard who thinks mushrooms are plants.

>>27787826
Someone needs to tell Gamefreak then

File: image.jpg (35KB, 600x400px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 600x400px

>>27787811
Next you're going to tell me owls are birds

Fungi should still be grass types because they are part of foliage in forests.

Prove me wrong.

>>27787828
They both grown in the ground, don't move and vegetarians eat them. That sounds like a plant to me.

>>27787921
Easy, you're flat out wrong.
Fungi is not considered foliage, vegetation or a part of the flora.

>>27787937
>>27787921
they literally lack plant cells

>>27787937
Rocks dont move, are sometimes eaten by animals for digestion aid and are part of the forest.

Plants confirmed.

>>27787937
>Almost all plant species are photosynthetic. No fungi are photosynthetic.
>Plants have cellulose in their cell walls.
Many fungi have chitin in their
cell walls.
>The majority of plant species reproduce via seeds.
Fungi reproduce via
spores.

>>27787979
Have you checked them all?

File: death pepe.jpg (261KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

261KB, 900x900px

>>27787767

>take an odd numbered generation
>make another mushroom themed spore user to outclass parasect

MEGA PARASECT NOOOOOOWWWWWWWW!!!!

>all the mushroom Pokemon are grass types
>Everyone in this thread implying I'm the retard

>>27788045
>implying its not standard game freak retardation
>implying you're not retarded

>>27788045
You are the retard.

>>27788018
they do so categorically and you can't even begin to argue that simple fact

>>27788045
>basing your understanding of biology on pokémon
please don't

>>27788104
>can't provide evidence, hasn't checked herself
>implies I'm the one who can't argue

File: retard.png (72KB, 211x244px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 211x244px

>>27787767
what typing would you rather it have?? besides it might evolve and have another type.

also, what is florges line (plant but not grass)

>>27788162
Normal or Poison.

>>27788045
>Claiming that a mushroom is a plant

>>27788162
Pure Fairy or Fairy/Psychic
There's no way this thing will lose Grass once stamped onto it.

>>27788162
Poison/Fairy
unused combination, perfect for a "fairy ring" evolution
Why does Gamefreak feel afraid to use Poison-type on newer Pokemon?

>>27788202
>>27788223
>>27788260
>bububuubu Gamefreak is perfect because mushrooms are plants so grass type

>>27788403
quit rambling

File: are you serious.jpg (45KB, 1031x586px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 1031x586px

>>27787937

>>27787920
Owls aren't birds

>>27788548
>I don't have an actual argument, so here's a meme

When did this place become tumblr?

>>27788632
>>27787937
I don't think you have any room to talk, considering you're so stupid/underaged that you don't understand the difference between Fungi and Plants. That's like saying a Venus Flytrap is an animal because it moves.

This meme is "Owls aren't birds" tier

>>27788632
"One difference that places fungi in a different kingdom is that its cell walls contain chitin, unlike the cell walls of plants, bacteria and some protists."
"Fungi are genetically more closely related to animals than to plants."

from Wikipedia you fucking mong

also I probably got baited but holy fuck

>>27788701
>Using Wikipedia as a source
>Literally anyone can edit it

Bulbapedia tier.

>>27788766
You remind me of that guy a couple of months ago that said sharks weren't fish but cetaceans.

>>27787811
Mushroom are fungi. And Fungi are not plants.

>>27788766
Check any fucking book or website with documented information on fungi and it will tell you that fungi are not plants

>this thread
ayy

>>27787937
>vegetarians eat them.
It's because they are retarded

>>27788766
The article is semi-protected so idiots like you wouldn't waltz in and claim a whole kingdom is a fucking plant.

>>27788825
>Getting angry coz someone disagrees with your opinion

Are you 7?

>>27787826
>>27787828
>>27787830
>>27787852
>>27787853
>>27788821
>Implying mushrooms aren't plants.

>>27788890
I'm not angry. I'm just explaining why you're an idiot.
I don't even know why I'm responding anymore since this is such obvious bait.

File: 1434515707483.gif (3MB, 240x180px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 240x180px

>Grass is a type
>None of the Pokemon that have Grass as a type are actually made of grass

File: OP.jpg (30KB, 637x627px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 637x627px

>>27788895
I'm not implying. It's scientifically proven.

File: 1424056897560.jpg (26KB, 150x188px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 150x188px

ITT: b8

>>27788919
>I'm not angry, I'm jjust responding even though I think this is bait

So you're the idiot.

>>27788922
Yet all grass types are plants

>>27788934
>Science

>>27788922
Skiddo and Gogoat have grass growing on them at least.

>this thread
Kek

>>27788919
Just stop responding to bait. At this point you look like a fool just as much as him.

>>27787920
birds:
>feathers
>wings
>they fly
>beak
>talons
Owls also have all this.

>>27788960
Skiddo's Pokedex entry says it's leaves, and presumably Gogoat also just has leaves.

>>27789031
Well you also have Land Skymin.

>>27789027
So Ostriches and Penguins aren't birds then.

>>27788045
This.
Breloom
Foongus
Paras
Gloom

If mushrooms weren't grass, GF wouldn't type them as such.

>>27789060
Your bait is getting weak anon.

>>27788958
>Yet all grass types are plants
>Paras
>Shroomish
>Foongus

>>27789091
Don't forget Lileep and Cradily.

File: mim.jpg (129KB, 400x600px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 400x600px

>>27789091
I see you typing, but I dont see you with a point

>>27787767
>Take a plant
>Draw eyes on it

literally a kirby enemy

>>27789241
But it's cute!

Fungus type should be a thing. Too bad fungus doesn't sound cute like fairy or omg pancakes, so the chance gamefreak will ever implement a fungus type is rather slim.

Would be fun though, attacking your opponent with an angry piece of moldy bread.

>>27789420
I think fungus is too specific to justify a whole type for itself. Lumping it together with plants really isn't that big of a deal except for turbo autists.

File: 1432708614479.png (152KB, 500x400px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 500x400px

>>27789060
So I guess then that Shuckle, Anorith, Crustle and Skorupi are all bugs because they are Bug-type?

>>27787767
>Take a plant
>a plant
>plant
It's a fungus

This is all a big bait right? Or do we really have actual literal retards here?

>>27789597
Yes.

I'm kinda thirsty. Anyone have a glass of Squirtle?

>>27789666
>Implying funguses aren't plannts
>Without evidence

People here are worse than tumblrites

File: image.jpg (55KB, 602x319px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 602x319px

>>27789845
This isn't good bait if you're attempting to "troll", it just comes off as cognitive dissonance if you're wondering why everyone is replying.

You made the original claim that fungi are intact, plants, so you're the one who would need to go publish a book up for peer review stating your hypothesis, provides evidence and ultimately changes science as we know it today.

>>27789845
First day Biology 101

why does every odd Gen have a mushroom

>>27790054
Gotta wait for the mushroom head to activate

She loves when that happens

>>27790036
>Responds to a post complaining about no evidence with more no evidence trolling

Go back to Tumblr

>>27789968
And yet not a single person in this thread has provided evidence that funguses aren't plants and are instead just being trolls and calling me stupid and quoting wikipedia at me.

>>27787767
Why isn't it poison-fairy that would have been cooler.

File: 1432703978900.png (31KB, 128x137px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 128x137px

>>27789735
Consider this then; Shuckle's an endolith. Endolith aren't bugs; they aren't even arthropods. They're fungus.

So tell me: why isn't Shuckle a Grass-type?

>>27790155
Rekt

>>27788895
Flowers and trees and the like are in the kingdom of plantae, while mushrooms are in the kingdom of fungi, meaning they are not, in fact, plants.

File: Faggots.png (13KB, 463x382px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 463x382px

>>27789845
The evidences are actually overwhelming.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fungus
>One difference that places fungi in a different kingdom is that its cell walls contain chitin, unlike the cell walls of plants, bacteria and some protists. Similar to animals, fungi are heterotrophs, that is, they acquire their food by absorbing dissolved molecules, typically by secreting digestive enzymes into their environment.
>Fungi are genetically more closely related to animals than to plants.
>Most fungi lack an efficient system for the long-distance transport of water and nutrients, such as the xylem and phloem in many plants.
>Plants and some other organisms have an additional terpene biosynthesis pathway in their chloroplasts, a structure fungi and animals do not have.
>Many of the plant and fungal enzymes that make these compounds differ from each other in sequence and other characteristics, which indicates separate origins and evolution of these enzymes in the fungi and plants.
>Fungi are more closely related to animals than to plants and are placed with the animals in the monophyletic group of opisthokonts.

>>27790263
>Again using Wikipedia, the anyone can say anything site
>Not reading the thread

>>27790285
The Fungus wikipedia article is extremely well documented. Do you want me to link the sources?

>>27790285
Are you a complete morron that believes in scientific conspirationnism, or are you just a complete morron that likes to shit at well-thought posts while never providing anything in contrast?

File: image.png (239KB, 414x406px) Image search: [Google]

239KB, 414x406px

>>27790285
>implying Wikipedia makes argument null
>ignoring the multitude of scholarly sources cited throughout

>>27790323
I want actual evidence and not whatever some Wikitard got paid by liberal scientists to write.

>>27790374
>Well thought out posts
>Copied and pasted information from Wikiepdia

Choose one.

I wish it was Grass/Electric. It would've been amazing as Grass/Electric. A huge,bulky Grass/Electric luminous mushroom.

Instead we're getting another Grass/Fairy in a generation already over-inundated with Fairy types. It's a shame, a luminous mushroom was one of the last chances we had to get a proper Grass/Electric.

>>27790393
What do you call an actual evidence? Do you want me to copy and paste the DNA code of some plants and the DNA code of some fungi? What do you not understand in the concept of "phylogenetic classification"? How is that not a sufficient proof?

>>27790393
You ask for evidences (and we gave you plenty), but what evidence do YOU have?

>>27787767
>>27787811
(You)
You got me. I'm triggered.

>>27790410
>complaining about another Fairy type
>Fairy is the third rarest type

>>27790393
You know that almost everything put in wikipedia is pulled word for word from its sources, right? And as I already said, mushrooms are in the fungi kingdom, not the plantae kingdom, which means that they are not plants. Taxonomy rarely lies, anon.

Holy shit. I can't tell if everyone here is just shit posting or literally too fucking stupid to realize the difference between plants and fungi. They're called Kingdoms you retards, and you should've learned about it back in Biology.

>>27790482
After only being introduced one game ago, that's hardly a big deal. If they don't slow down a little, people are going to start getting very tired of Fairy.

>>27790428
At this point I'd take anything that's not a Wikipedia quote which is all any one has provided for me so far, but what do you expect of millenials who believe everything they read on the internet and what their liberal college professors tell them.

>>27790453
I've been asking for evidence and all I've been given are insults, outsourced statemetns of ""Facts"" and direct quotes from Wikipedia.

>>27790529
>liberal college professors tell them
lmao this shit is taught in fourth grade, if your american education has failed you it's not our fault

File: image.jpg (22KB, 255x255px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 255x255px

ITT everyone answering obvious bait or just plain retarded underage

>>27790393
Evidence:
- Fungus cell walls contain chitin, not plant, bacteria and protist cell walls. Proof: just look through a microscope, you'll see by yourself. Don't care enough to do it? Then shut up.
- Fungi are heterotrophs, plants are autotrophs. Proof: very well known fungi and plant places in ecosystems, even in everyday life. Fungi feed on organic matter, while plants don't. Only plants use photosynthesis.
- Fungi don't have any root, they have mycelium instead. Roots and mycelium structures are extremely different. Proof: just look at them, either through a microscope or even just with your bare eyes.
Many more evidences exist, but those are EXTREMELY obvious, even for a morron like you.

>>27790518
>I disagree with you so you're stupid

Typical liberal, go back to Tumlnlr

>>27787767
More like

>take a pokemon
>Make it a fairy type for no fucking reason

Will you people stop replying to that fucking retard. He's either trolling or mentally challenged. Stop giving him the (You)s he so desperately craves.

File: 1432708987031.png (104KB, 588x466px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 588x466px

>>27790529

>>27790594
>Tumlnlr
calm down

Mushroom are plants, stop baiting you freakin losers.

>>27790589
>No sources
>Insults
>Morron

Try again.

>>27790594
>>I disagree with you so you're stupid
Isn't that what you're doing?

>>27790594
I've never once been on that site, but I am older than 12 therefore I know the difference between Plantae and Fungi Kingdoms.

>>27790529
Fact: there are things in taxonomy called kingdoms.
Fact: Plants belong to the plantae kingdom.
Fact: Fungi do not belong to the plantae kingdom.
Fact: Fungi are not plants.

You don't need modal logic to explain something so simple. And attacking the credibility of a source does not refute the claim.

Unless you are going to go all Agrippa, then you don't have a leg to stand on or, as you have shown, a brain to think with.

>>27790574
If anything, the American education system has failed the people who can't provide a better source than fucking Wikipedia.

>>27790688
Where is your source?

>>27788922

It's called Plant-type in most languages, to be fair

>>27790682
>Again lacking any evidence and just calling them facts
>The source of the info absolutely matters
>No one here can link to a source that's not Wikipedia.

But I'm the so called stupid one. Good job, millennials.

>>27790688
You can bitch and moan about wikipedia all you like but you've yet to provide evidence of the contrary.

I'd provide you with online scholarly sources but you wouldn't be able to access them as I have paid access through my university's library.

File: oie_71IgRMATo3DW.jpg (40KB, 600x471px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 600x471px

>>27790747
Where's your evidence that says fungi are plants? If your gonna call out people for not having sources, you outta cough some up yourself.

>>27790747
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2346548/

There.

>>27790795
>
I'd provide you with online scholarly sources but you wouldn't be able to access them as I have paid access through my university's library.

Hmm, sounds like my gf from Canada

>>27790747
Welp, I'm calling bait. No one is too dumb to understand taxonomy.

File: FUCKING SOURCES OTHER THAN WIKIPEDIA.png (1MB, 1728x2988px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1728x2988px

HERE ARE FUCKING SCIENTIFIC SOURCES OTHER THAN WIKIPEDIA
READ THROUGH EVERYTHING AND ONLY THEN COME BACK

>>27790836
Thank you. That's all I wanted. It's embarassing no one was able to provide anything credible for this long.

>>27790808
This. What a troll.

>>27790839
you caught me I'm a big ol' syrup guzzling moose

>>27790808
Yall know that this was a troll, but it is down right shameful how ya'll can't provide non-wiki evidence and you just go straight to insults.

ITT: autistic biologyfags reply seriously to obvious bait

>>27790863
The wikipedia article alone already gives 249 different sources and this blind fucker is repetedly asking for sources. What a mongolian.

>>27790989
So you've read all 249 and know that they all directly answer OP's question?

File: 4W7ng1Y.png (94KB, 1302x1301px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 1302x1301px

>>27787767

File: notagrass.png (51KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 250x250px

>>27788922

>>27791016
OP just rejected wikipedia blindly while he should have read the entire articles and ALL sources relevant to his question before asking for OTHER sources. That's terribly unintelligent.

>>27791061
His problem was that Wikipedia can be edited by anyone so he didn't trust it. Why would he waste his time? Asking for a non-Wiki source shouldn't take that long, desu.

Some of you would have been/will be lucky to make it through an under-grad education if Wikipedia is your first port of call for proving stuff is true.

This thread is a master class in learning how to not fall for bait, holy shit.

Keep going

>>27791168
There is no problem using wikipedia for an undergrad education. Just make sure to actually check that wikipedia's sources are valid and list those in your paper instead.
Any higher education usually requires you to do extensive research yourself.

>>27791168
rofl. I've got a master dude. You never have to trust wikipedia blindly, you just look at wikipedia sources by yourself.

>>27791262
Its my schools policy not to give an essay full marks if more than 25% of the articles come from the wikipedia references.