Thread replies: 10
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
now claim it's not true, we wanted more edgy and cool pokemon's after gen 1 and many drop the series after they saw gen 3rd starters and co...
it's nothing wrong in making pokemon's for childrens that looks cute or shit but we hadn't many things like golem, arcanine, persian, gyarados ect. in later gens...
pokemon's became something shitty...
>>
>>27776119
>4...s
Was it necessary...?
>>
>>27776138
I saw 3
But yeah OP is a fag and there is no point to this thread
Gen 3 actually brought me back
>>
>>27776164
Thread subject
>>
>>27776138
because when we are speaking about many things we add 's? pokemon's are not singular
>>
>>27776164
gen 3 actually sold the worst since gen 1-2 and gens 4-6 were only proof that the franchise is dying...
>>
>>27776492
gen 3 only sold poorly because the original fanbase were being told that pokemon is lame because they reached the teenage years and they wanted to be popular.
it's what really separated fans from the 'Genwunners', because there are plenty of examples of Genwunners that like Gen 2, too.
hence why the two gens are often lumped together.
literally the only people that think Pokemon should have stopped after Gen 2 are the people that haven't grown out of this phase, they're pretty much socially retarded.
>>
>>27776119
b8b8b8b8b8b8b8b8b8b8b8b8b8b8b8
>>
>>27776565
gen 3 design actually make them looking worst than ever... .
why you just cant agree that newest monsters are lame as hell? they have fan base because of tastes but they are no longer looking like they should like...
>>
>>27776688
2/2
design evolved but seriously...for example; why they just can't draw normal cats anymore? normal dogs? normal birds but some retarded shit?
why there's lack of badass monsters? gen 1-2 had more cool designs than gen 3-6 together
why it's so hard to project more cool looking dex if they want run the franchise?
Thread posts: 10
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1