That's weird

>>27670347
No it's not you fucking faggot

>>27670347
What about this is particularly weird?

>he believes the leaks.
All Alola starters are non-evolving.

>>27670392
Well it currently isn't known if it evolves. It's not wrong, just an oddly worded place holder.

420 Blaze it!

>>27670347
That's just how Bulbapedia handles new Pokemon. Until the evo's are officially released it'll say that.

>>27670428
It's extremely misleading

>>27670488
No it's not you dyslexic autismo. It specifically states that it has no KNOWN evolutions. We don't know its evolutions. Ergo, it is not known to evolve, merely assumed.

>>27670411
we do know it evolves you fucker

File: Screenshot_756.png (928KB, 1249x314px) Image search: [Google]

928KB, 1249x314px

>>27670428
That's how sites should handle it.
>>27670488
It's misleading to not post unconfirmed info?

>>27670347
It has a middle evolution that hasn't been revealed yet, and we don't know the official name of its final evolution yet. Even if they wanted to, it would be hard to add information on its evolutions at this point in time.

If you're talking about the pointless repetiveness between the last two sentences though I agree.

>>27670347
>litten should never evolve and stay forever young

what did he mean by this

>>27670583
The article could do without that first sentence altogether. It's not necessary.

>>27670583
But I thought the leaks were """""confirmed"""""