So the other day some anon ( >27529073 ) posted more Chinese leaks but didn't give a source. I found one from before anon made the thread.
http://pokejungle.net/2016/08/01/chinese-rumor-leaked-starter-evolutions-confirmed-true/
>>27529073 Messed up the link.
It's not a Chinese leak you retard. The OP of that thread is just piggybacking off of the successful leaks which already mentioned variants and a snowman, and using intentionally poor grammar at that.
>>27559224
>The thread is from August 3rd
>The article on PokeJungle is from August 1st
Can't you read, anon?
>>27559161
Those aren't the chinese leaks retard
>>27559161
>starter final evos
>chinese leak
No