SM Leaks thread

Is there literally any reason to believe this at all?

>>27517986
Nope

File: FB_IMG_1465075418893.jpg (5KB, 480x250px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 480x250px

>>27517986
none

>>27517977
>tfw well never be able to differentiate real leaks from fakes anymore now that a real leaker doesnt use a trip code but comes by and posts it up

File: This kills the frog.gif (667KB, 500x309px) Image search: [Google]

667KB, 500x309px

>4 evolutions for each starter and the dog

Is that even possible?

>>27518075
>yfw 25% of the new pokemon are starters and rock doges

>>27517986
This thread was probably made by the "leaker" to get more attention.

>>27517977
this is pure bullshit, oricorio does not change form with a flower, retard

>>27518085
I'm not the leaker

>>27517986
There is very little reason to believe any leak aside from the starter concept art because they all have had some major inconsistencies in them.

>>27518131
It LITERALLY says that on the website