Rowlet thread
Rowlet is love, Rowlet is life
Dis
Gus
Ting
>it's an artist is afraid to take risks when thinking of a fakemon evolution and just makes it bigger episode
While the artwork is cool, the evolutions look so bland and I agree, they just made Rowlet bigger...
>>27441404
Anon, how dafuq can a BIRD be GROUND TYPE?ESPECIALLY IF IT"S OTHER TYPE IS ALREADY FIXED??!!!Yea, I know Landorus exists, but notice how I said bird, not Retard tiger/Bara Genie
Rowlet is love, rowlet is life
>>27441463
>What is a burrowing owl
Jesus you pokenerds don't know your animals.. you really should though
>>27441413
>>27441434
ishygddt
It's a bit simple, and I feel like the real ones feathers are going to look like some sort of suit with it's little leaf bowtie. That being said I would be more than ok with this, looks pretty cool and I'm pretty sure I did see someone say they were returning to simpler designs.
I liked Rowlet until I realised it's impossible to make a good looking evo without it just being bigger, which Game Freak doesn't do anymore.
Shame, it'll probably evolve into some ugly e621bait.
>>27441644
But rowlet's based on a barn owl tho.
Eh why not...
Group gif. owl appears at the end.
Rowlet evos are going to be apple themed.
Cap this.
>>27442960
Heracross and Mega Heracross are two different beetle species. Oddish's line is all different plants too. Wingull and Pelipper are obviously different species too. Evolutions don't have to stay the same real-life animal species.
>>27441463
>burrowing owl
>owlbear
>talons become root-like
>flaps dust around
It will be Grass/Ground and Charizard will stay the only starter that can learn Fly because it's Charizard.
Make Rowlet a griffin
>>27443074
>heracross has a mega which means they can change species if they want
>oddish has two diffrent types of final evolutions
>wingull and pelipper are still birds found on the same place and the transition to pelipper is understandable since beak gets bigger
Its gonna stay grass/flying anon
>>27441404
i love this design
cooler than the real one
>>27444563
Found the furfag.
>>>/trash/
>>27441404
The design is nice but
>Grass/Groundfags
>>27444563
The design is nice but
>Realfags
>>27441404
>muh website filenames
>it just gets bigger
this design is a great example to show why the chinese leak one is so good.
>>27441404
That's actually my favorite Rowlet's evolution line.
>>27441404
>it just gets bigger
the reason robinhoot is so believable is because it develops on the knife throwing theme not just ITS BIGGER AND STILL HAS A BOW TIE
this is a key thing most fakemon miss out on
Roothoot was a better hope for the future
>>27444563
No
>>27444661
>>27444771
Good luck roothoot and finpip
>>27444698
You do realize the fake artist who made this leak had all the information of Rowlet and could of easily came up with an archer? Saying it fits in with the theme just because it matches up doesn't prove anything. In fact they're are more holes in the evolution themes then they're are points. Rowlets evo make sense to an extent but Lucha Litten and Poppmaid are literally streches. Sorry anon
>>27442975
why would they put the blue backround for the red pokemon, the red backround for the blue pokemon, then greenbackround for the green pokemon?
>>27444809
Also that people were talking about archery long before the fake imaged appeared.
>>27444832
Rowlet shoots sharp feathers out, and is called the Grass Quill pokemon, in which the word quill can be related to arrows. No wonder he drew an archer concept, he has all this information, of course he's going to fucking use it all! Honestly I can't wrap my head around why people believe these are real, liking the bad designs is one thing but pleading their realness when it's more likely to be fake is one big problem
>>27444809
>Rowlets evo make sense to an extent but Lucha Litten and Poppmaid are literally streches.
Let me guess, you're one of those people who think Popplio MUST be a clown and that Litten MUST be quadruped. Sorry, but your using your own shallow creativity is not a valid reason for why these might be fake.
>>27445126
I'm the kind of person who fucks your mom every night.
>>27445160
Rekt
>>27445126
Wow how'd you guess? And no I'm not using my opinion to judge credibility, I'm using common sense and information we have on the starters so far. And I'm not the only one who reads the information and looks at the leaks and comes up with the conclusion that the traits that they begin with don't resemble at all to what the concepts show. But yes I am one of those people who think the real starter evos will be a Grass flying owl, a Quadrupedal Fire tiger and a Large Sea Lion that uses water balloons. But what do I know it's not like these concepts make more sense then your precious leaks right? ;)
>>27445126
Not that guy, but he's right. Robinhoot at least has the theme of using projectile feathers like Rowlet does.
What does Tigermask have to do with oily fur, hairballs, and a cool, collected personality? Where is his flaming back that's present on Litten, and why does it turn to a belt?
What does a singing mermaid have to do with Popplio's acrobatic skills? His ability to use bubbles as balloons? There's literally no connection besides "they're both entertainers!"
Regarding that, what IS the theme between the 3 leaked starter evos? The closest thing I can think of are "performers", but that even seems to be a stretch.
The XY starters kept part of their theme throughout their lines, so why wouldn't the SM starters?
>>27445160
more like the yours, you cuck.
>>27445230
>thinking information about base forms mean anything in the long run
yeah, Torchic evolving into a humanoid martial arts master was totally obvious from reading its Pokedex entries and looking at it, right? Quit thinking that all starters still have this very rigid progression in their evolutions.
>>27445314
Waiting for some idiot to go say "but their personalities and themes changes as they evolve. That's not a valid argument as to why certain design aspects as well as central themes become so warped in these leak concepts. Apparently Littens spikes are incorporated onto it's belt when it uses a fire attack, but that literally makes so sense, those spikes make litten seem more cat like, and Popplios apparently stops using bubbles for acrobatic stunts and now they appear as tiny bubbles when Poppmaid sings. Again Rowlets makes sense to an extent, but the other two are big streches. Waiting to be attacked by team real with the "theme and personality changes when they evolve" argument
>>27441404
shit taste
>>27441428
good taste
>>27443159
way too overdesigned
>>27444563
shit taste
>>27445454
So you're saying that a thing that is present in a lot of Pokemon and arguably is a big aspect of it doesn't matter?
Hoo boi
>>27445446
You people seem to love using the Torchic argument which I don't understand that being gen 3 and all. This is gen 7 and Gamefreak seem to love giving hints as to what the new pokemon might evolve into. Don't believe me see Rockruff, Grubbins and Wimpods website entry. That information does become apparent and more developed as they evolve, but it has to at the very least make sense.
>>27444817
Color variety!
>>27441404
I love the second evo but holy fuck what are you going for with the last one
>>27445554
No it does matter. But notice how Rockruffs entry hints it towards becoming a wolf when it evolves saying it howls at the moon when it's ready to evolve, or how Grubbin likes powerplants and it evolves into a battery that stores electricity and then Vikavolt that uses said electricity, and even recharges using another Charabug. The electricity theme stays apparent throughout the line. Gamefreak had already given the starters a theme, that theme is going to be incorporated one way or another as it evolves.
>>27441404
I know I'm going to hate his evolutions, so let me enjoy Rowlet while I still can.
>>27441463
>implying that owls are birds
>>27445692