At least gen 5 won't have the worst starters anymore.

File: Tai_Lung_Kung_Fu_Panda_1023.jpg (61KB, 644x768px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 644x768px

Only bad one is fire but I don't care about fire because Rowlet's the best designed grass starter yet.

>>27430796
Nope they'll still hold that title

But those are good designs

File: image.png (177KB, 501x506px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 501x506px

>>27430796

>>27430796
>implying the leaks are real
>implying the leaks are poorly designed

Double bait. Good job OP.

File: wug.jpg (93KB, 790x629px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 790x629px

>The owl is actually cool
>Fire starter isn't a total mess of a design
>Water starter doesn't inexplicably become a quadruped
Nice try, OP.

File: Nigga.jpg (78KB, 832x584px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 832x584px

THESE ARENT REAL

STOP SHILLING THEM

IF I DREW A PIECE OF SHIT AND NEVER TOLD YOU I DREW IT YOU WOULD BELEIVE IT FUCKER

SHUT THE FUCK UP

SHUT UP

YOU FUCKER

HOPEFULLY THE AUGUST 1 INFO SHUTS YOU DOWN

FUCKER

File: Ass smacking.gif (180KB, 256x188px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 256x188px

>>27431395

File: Sugimori_652[1].png (142KB, 431x359px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 431x359px

>>27430796
You mean at least they aren't as bad as this.
And I doubt whatever might come will be worse than Chesnaught.

>>27430796
>Implying Robinhoot and Serlimaid aren't elder god tier

As much as I hate the mermaid, the group overall would still be better than gen 5.

Also, these are fake.

>liking the most horribly designed final stage grass starter to date
>liking yet another humanoid fire starter
I like the mermaid as a Pokémon, but not as a starter.

>>27431341
>>27431361
>>27431391
>>27431491
I mean, I could understand if you're twelve and you just think they're cool, but people have yet to give reasons as to why the ones in the OP are well designed.
For example, it's kind of funny that the designer had to pull a hood out of his ass to make the archer owl idea work. Even then, [thing human does] + animal is probably the laziest type of design next to just making it a recolored animal.
There's no inspiration there, just the age-old trope of an animal doing a human thing.

>>27431568
>>Stop liking what I don't!!!

>>27431634
Yes please, I would appreciate that. Also the first two are shitty designs no matter how you look at it.

File: image.jpg (21KB, 106x150px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 106x150px

>>27431618
>lol only underage kids can like these

(You)

File: Green_Arrow_(Stephen_Amell)[1].png (193KB, 235x318px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 235x318px

>>27431618
>but people have yet to give reasons as to why the ones in the OP are well designed.

They're creative with their theme and expand well on the first stages without falling into the "it just gets bigger" trap a lot of deviantart tier evolutions do.

That owl for example could very easily be an official design in the same lieu as Greninja. Instead of just taking Froakie and making it a generic bigger frog they enlaced the ninja connection into it and took a frog's trademark long tongue and made into a ninja scarf. Now here instead of just making a generic cool bigger owl they made it into an archer and it draws feathers from its wings and uses them as arrows. And the hooded shit fits into how owls are sneaky and well aware of their surroundings. It just works.

>>27430796
Gen 5 never had the worst starters, but I can see why you'd pretend Gen 4 doesn't exist.

File: Opinion.gif (500KB, 500x210px) Image search: [Google]

500KB, 500x210px

>>27431669

File: Belle 2.png (159KB, 650x439px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 650x439px

>>27431395

>>27431704
Where does it get the hood from?

>>27431391
whoa, whoa now hold on. Serperior is 10/10 nigga what are you trying to say

>>27431766
It's feathers that naturally grow from its head.

>>27431766
Are you really so fucking baffled at where a fucking grass hood on a grass type Pokemon comes from?

>>27431782
>not humanoid
Instant 0/10 from me, personally.

>>27431805
Yes, because it's unbelievably retarded.

>>27431819
Not nearly as retarded as you

>>27431819
why does the entire bulbasaur line just have flowers on their back?

Pokemon doesn't have to make sense idiot

>>27430796
I actually think Litten's isn't that bad. It has an okay design, and would be good if it didn't make it bipedal, and firefighting. I think Rowlet's is the worst, based on its boring design.

>>27431848
>>27431849
I'm sorry if I don't find this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vCUwKJxLU0
interesting in a game where Vic Viper and bat scorpions exist as tameable creatures.
Arrowl and friends are just extremely boring Pokémon, sorry.

>>27431874
>The hood doesn't make sense!
>changes argument to "t-the design is boring!"

That doesn't have shit to do with whether a grass hood makes any sense, keep your goalposts in one place.

>>27431395
They're only gaining notoriety because of these Chinese leaks.
(which are also fake)

File: 2016-03-13 (1).png (436KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

436KB, 640x480px

>>27430796
>gen 5
>worst designs
>these
>bad

>>27431766

That is the stupidest reason to think these are fake. Where does Charizard get wings from? The answer is that Pokemon gain extra characteristics as they evolve. Besides, for all we know the hood shows up with the mid-evolution.