What does /vp/ think of Wormadam?

>>27408803
I never had a Wormadam, but it seems good.
8/10

Ugly, weak and forgettable. But there are worse pokemon.

>>27408803
I love Grass and Sandy-Wormadam. I will train one ingame in the future (depending what I lack I'll use grass or ground).

Trash is... trash.

Since the sand cloak is the better bug/ground type, I use her sometimes when I fight triple battles only using bug types or ground types. Most people do not expect sucker punch, although it doesn't pack a big punch to it. Why did sucker punch only have to be from a gen 4 move tutor?

I prefer Mothim to it, but I like the plant cloak and sandy cloak.

File: Blue Myself.jpg (9KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 200x200px

>>27408803
>I just realised Wormadam is probably a play on "worth a damn".

Shit bugs from a shit gen.

If you liked D/P/Plt then youre just a dumb fucking sinnohfetus retard whose opinion isnt worth shit

>>27411930
Trash is the best, best type

>>27412038
It's "Worm" and "Madam"
Mothim is "Moth" and "Him".

>>27412356
Are you okay dude?

Grass one is ok, the other 2 are fucking disgusting and should have never existed.

The Trash one was a lot of fun to use in Gen 5 NU

>>27408803
I'm doing an X run with mons i've never used and the trash cloak is the mvp of my team. I'm still on the line about the design but as a bugfag i really like the critter

>>27408803
I like their designs and concept but they're shit in battle

>>27408803
Overcoat has made them descent in Ranbats as they take powders like champs. Trash a best comp wise, but Grass a bugfu.