Can someone please explain to me how nintendo has not made a fully 3d home console pokemon game yet?
ESPECIALLY when the wii u has been such a massive failure
imagine exploring a pitch dark cave in 3rd person mode and being ambushed by a zubat out of the darkness with no battle cut or warning. you battle right on the spot in a fully 3d environment with detailed animations on everything
imagine it with dark souls style multiplayer where enemy trainers can enter your world and challenge you right there while exploring
theres so much shit you can think of that would be amazing
this shit would print money, make the current nintendo console an absolute must have. instead of essentially the same fucking game for the last 15 years.
pokemon has to be one of the most underutilized IPs in gaming in terms of what can be done with it. look at pokemon go, something slightly different and it became an overnight phenomenon. nintendo could revitalize their entire console division with it, it seems so obvious but they still havent done it
>wanting to play Pokémon in a home console
Kys
>>27384903
All of that sounds fucking awful.
>>27384903
Your ideas are shit. Fuck off.
>>27384903
Console pokemon games sell like shit and they don't want to risk cannibalising their handheld sales.
Also pokemon is about socialising rather than sitting at home.
>What is stadium
>What is colosseum
>What is Gale of darkness
>>27384953
>Also pokemon is about socialising rather than sitting at home.
literally everyone on this board is an autistic neet though
>>27384964
Stop projecting anon
>>27384954
>3D battle simulator
>sold like garbage compared to handheld
>sold like garbage compared to handheld>>27384964
>>27384924
>Implying the majority of vp plays pokemon outside of their houses
>>27384903
>imagine it with dark souls style multiplayer where enemy trainers can enter your world and challenge you right there while exploring
The Dark Souls style of approach isn't good for pokemon arguably it isn't good for anything.
>>27384903
Mainline Pokemon games belong on handhelds, end of story.
>>27384954
not traditional pokemon games.
This shit won't happen until they stop producing handheld games, meaning that there is no profit incentive on handhelds, which is never going to happen.
I would want a Kanto remake in full 3D on a console, though perhaps not involving all of OP's dumb ideas.
The mainline games should stay on handhelds though. But if the NX is truly a handheld/console hybrid, then who knows.
>>27385025
Even if the handhelds stopped selling they'd be more likely to go to mobile.
>>27385038
>But if the NX is truly a handheld/console hybrid, then who knows.
It's not
dont bother OP, autists love their habits and hate change
thats why they made the same game for 15 years
>>27385077
there are people who hated mega evolutions because it was "fan service". This is the most autistic fanbase ever.
>>27385077
>hate change
>game has changed drastically since gen 3 which revitalised the franchise
>>27385057
Let me guess, you're uncle works at nintendo?
>>27385180
your* holy fuck how did that happen?
>>27385180
No but my common sense does.
If they make it a hybrid console the system would be $500 or more and we all know about the last system that was that that much.
>>27385155
>what are tweaks, features, and upgrades.
not real change
>>27384903
Sounds like shit
Because Nintendo doesn't develop Pokemon games.
>>27385234
You do realise that you don't have to make it a shooter for it to change right?
>>27385299
you're fucking retarded
compare link to the past to ocarina of time
thats the change pokemon games need to make
>>27385315
Oh so you agree that it's changed then. Well except gen 4 for the most part
>>27385315
>compare link to the past to ocarina of time
Basic Zelda gameplay with new mechanics and perspectives.
You do realise that's what Pokemon does each and every game right?
>>27385209
Nvidia shield alrrady exists. Theyre not going for ps4 level performance. Thers no reason it should be 500.
If Nintendo were going to do a game like this, they should use the engine from Xenoblade Chronicles X. As I was playing it, I felt it would lend itself to the world of Pokemon.
Rather than fighting aliens and flying in skells, you'd fight/capture pokemon and ride on them. You would explore a new gigantic region with your Pokemon as your party.
All types of Pokemon would be flying around. If you head to the wrong place, you could get fucked up by a legendary.
I don't know why so many people in the Pokemon fandom are against a mainline game being on a console as it would lead to the death of the handhelds. It could work and I believe if done right, could earn Nintendo a lot of money.
>>27384903
>consoletrash
>soulstard
Could you be any dumber?
>genwun picture
There it is.
>>27384951
>tripfag telling others to fuck off
>>27384954
>spinoffs
>>27384903
Because TRADING and COMMUNICATION and PERSONAL
(all things that died with the Internet)
I'm all for this OP. I also had the idea of trainers entering your game a la Dark Souls on a console Polemon game. And I like the seamless transition into battle, I'm thinking almost something like Super Mario RPG, that way it could keep it's traditional turn based combat while still feeling like a living environment.
>>27387552
Way too much work for GF. Also most of the casual Pokemon fans don't have time for a big ass Pokemon game. 8 badges, run through a few caves, E4, that's it.
>>27387716
Fuck off Masuda, literally kill yourself.
Also,
>supporting ganking
People like you should be publicly stoned to death.
>>27384953
>Console pokemon games sell like shit
That's because they either make them nigh unplayable without having the handheld games or make them complete "PIKA PIKACHU AND HIS HAPPY MARKETABLE FRIENDS ON ADVENTURES xD" shit that nobody over the age of 5 would be caught dead playing.
Nintendo is rumored to be combining handheld and console with NX, so you can play it on your TV if you want. It'll probably be bigger than what we're used to with Pokemon, but don't expect it to be some big ass world where you run into caves or climb mountains and shit like Zelda or Xenoblade.
>>27387818
...You do realize that seamless worlds have been around for at least a decade?
>>27387832
What's your point?
>>27387862
You could make one on a potato if you wanted to. Modern consoles have way more power than that.
>>27387919
Yes, and I don't see your point still. You're suggesting that Pokemon will be some huge seamless adventure when most modern Japanese games are just you running through some corridors or small area and exiting into some more.