Is this THE perfect pokemon game?
sequel is better
You were close!
>>27368493
>they never made a sequel on the Wii U
the only experience I have with this game is pic related
>>27368600
Everything about this is messed up. How can you get it so wrong?
>>27368490
Agree, but the game could still use more refinement. Being able to play as more pokemon, more uses for the pokemon's moves, more challenging battles.
>>27368446
I actually liked Pokémon Channel. If it's anything like that, I'd probably like it.
>>27368675
Actually anon it's a completely different genre, it's more like action-adventure than the virtual pet thing Pokemon Channel was. It's still ez though, but I still like it because it'scute.
>>27368493
Wonderful!
>>27368600
>charmander is clearly orange and clearly has a flame on it's tail
>ITS GRASS TYPE RIGHT, WHATEVER, ROLL WITH IT
>>27368807
>calling based treecko a charmander
INCREDIBLY obvious newfag spotted
>>27368807
Something tells me the editor placed the text boxes and only then superimposed the first "3_pokemon(1).png" image he could find in the Pokepark_Review folder and rushed that shit out to print.
No wonder gaming mags died.
>>27368446
Sorry, wrong file :P
>>27368446
It's a tie between Platinum, Emerald, HGSS and BW2
>>27368518
Confirmation that Game Freak is brain dead.