Based on this pattern, par generations get less pokemon than

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 5
Thread images: 1

Anonymous
2016-07-25 19:13:55 Post No. 27357730
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: image.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

Anonymous 2016-07-25 19:13:55 Post No. 27357730 [Report]

Based on this pattern, par generations get less pokemon than their counterparts. Colors indicate how many pokemon they have, and we can clearly see 1,3,5, and thus 7 will include more pokemon than 2, 4 or 6. With this clear, it is safe to asume we will get over 100 pokemon, like they dis in gen 5. Thoughts?

Anonymous 2016-07-25 19:33:38 Post No.27357992
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-07-25 19:33:38 Post No.27357992 [Report]

We already know there's gonna be over 100 just based on the ones revealed + supposed evolutions

Anonymous 2016-07-25 19:35:37 Post No.27358021
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-07-25 19:35:37 Post No.27358021 [Report]

>>27357730
90-115 is a safe bet for the range.

Anonymous 2016-07-25 19:35:37 Post No.27358022
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-07-25 19:35:37 Post No.27358022 [Report]

>>27357730
>Based on this pattern

>muh patterns

Anonymous 2016-07-25 20:27:28 Post No.27358750
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-07-25 20:27:28 Post No.27358750 [Report]

>>27358022

But it is a pattern. Every even Generation had a lower number of new Pokemons than the odd Generations

Based on this pattern, par generations get less pokemon than

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible. Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/