>people still take competitive pokemon seriously
>tournaments with prize money are considered skill-based
>accuracy still hasn't been deleted
>there are over 5 pokegirl threads in the catalog
>>people still take competitive pokemon seriously
>no fun allowed
>>tournaments with prize money are considered skill-based
>if they didn't have prize it would be skill based
>>accuracy still hasn't been deleted
>i get anally fucked by double team
>Accuracy is one of my major issues with competitive pokémon
>When it's obviously stated on the chart of the move it's accuracy
>Absolutely nothing wrong with Critical Hits
Leave to op to never know what he is talking about.
>>27355261
I would play competitive a lot more than watch it RNG isnt so fucked up on the series. N example would be any move that has 90% chance to miss has fucked me up several times over than actual misplays or offensive moves that "sometimes lowers x stat by x stage"
>>27355314
If RNG isnt so fucked up*
>>27355314
you don't have to use 90% moves. you decided to take the 9/10 hit rate, don't blame the game.
>>27355180
>accuracy still hasn't been deleted
So make Fissure and Sheer Cold always hit?
Or why would anyone use Flamethrower over Fire Blast?
>>27355180
Wow IVs gods sure weren't fair with that one.
>>27355180
>accuracy still hasn't been deleted
Yay, no more Stone Miss and Focus Miss!