>Genwunners complain about new Pokemon for being unoriginal

File: thumbnail_76490f511af008ed5a248280e7150041a8d05851.png (14KB, 150x77px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 150x77px

>>27335380
>tail looks like a water spout
10/10 design

>>27335380
Seel was my first Pokemon card. Some neighborhood bully scared me out of it by saying his tangela card is stronger and he would win in a battle. A few days later his mom made him give it back and he refused, instead of giving me the seel he gave me the tangela. No idea why he wanted the seel so bad. This post has no meaning. But seel has a special place in my nostalgia for this reason even though it wouldn't even be in my top 400 Pokemon

>>27335462
Scammed not scared. Stupid Ass phone.

What about it is unoriginal? It's just simple and gets the point across.

Gen 1 introduced 3 piles of purple slime, a rock with arms, and a pile of eggs, yet people call them original. How the fuck does that work

>>27335514
Muh nostalgia

>>27335514
because they are original.

>>27335462
>this post has no meaning

This post has no meaning.

>>27335488
It's just plain rice. You don't dread but you're not excited for it either. It's just there in a bowl full of more interesting foodstuff, whether it's appealing or not.

>>27335514
Because there were no pokemon before it. You can't rip off what doesn't exist.

>>>/vp/rules/4/

>>27335488
It's literally a seal with a horn glued on. That's the epitome of unoriginal.

>>27337503
True but eggs have existed since things started laying them, sliced are a common video game enemy and another is just a rock with arms glued on.

They aren't original by aren't stretch of the imagination.