Rate Areodactyl's mega design
stupid ass goatee/10
edge
>>27332349
4/10
>>27332349
Pretty natural progression
>>27332377
but yes, he would be better without chin spike
>>27332349
Ugly and bad, but not as ugly and bad as Hydreigon.
Would you like Archeops to get a mega?
Sucks. All they did was add a bunch of random spikes.
What if they got rid of the spikes on the wings and face and gave it a rock helmet/mask?
Would it look better?
>>27332349
>Just bigger and edgier
Not as bad as Charizard Y and X but still very shit.
>>27332349
>average gen IV evo.png
Mega stupid.
>>27332349
Dunno why people bitch so much about the spikes, outside the chin it looks pretty normal for a dragonic creature, and it was the only one of the three fossils to not be spiky.
>>27332532
Charizard Y and X are good though.
Y is for "function" something that would seem good to a more mature/practical audience (well, practical and mature for ten-year-olds).
X is for "form", and exaggerates every kid's idea of what's cool about charizard.
Both serve a purpose.
>>27332532
All aboard the Charizard hate train. Hue hue hue.
>>27332395
>natural progression
>Less aerodynamic with spikes but faster
>>27332583
I can see that. But it just looks like they were afraid to drastically change charizards design since he is one of the most loved mons in the entire series.
Both are very secure, there are even 2 forms so they dont lose any fans if one design doesnt connect with the audience.
>>27332349
A solid 38.
MAYBE a 39
>>27332349
Is a 10/10. Too bad almost everyone fucks it up on fanarts. He looks awesome in-game
>>27332349
armenian genocide/ 10
>>27332349
>just areodactyl with random rocks glued to it
0/10
>>27332349
10/10 because its better than Aerodactyl
>>27332349
Solid
>>27332349
Ow the edge/10
Why would they put a bunch of edgy stones on it and call it a day? It looks like a 14 year old's mega evolution.
We want the Monster Hunter audience/10
>>27332800
Beats me.
>>27332349
0/10
didn't even try