Pokemon GO conspiracy

>>27249401
Who literally gives a shit if they get pictures. Are you a criminal?

>>27249412
This. I'm pretty sure no one gives a shit what I'm doing in a Central European village at 4 am.

>>27249401
>Also, are Pokemon encounters client-side or server-side?

Regular encounters and lure encounters are server-side, incense encounters are client-side.

Your conspiracy theory is stupid, by the way.

>>27249401
Dem paranoid neckbeards at it again

>>27249401

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keyhole,_Inc
Niantic is a blackwater funded corporation
Geospatial mapping and all that jazz
Take that as you want

That being said, i won't let the botnet spoil my fun

>>27249440
Thanks. It's not mine, I want to decisively disprove it

>>27249401
How can we prove that 4chan isn't selling your information to the fbi?

just do what i do and never use the internet

>>27249523
Honestly, I don't really care about 4chan. I only care about Pokemon GO. And I'm fed up with those theories.
Here's a little story for you. My dad is a programmer (with a lot of experience) and, because of Keyhole Inc. being funded by CIA, he is very paranoid about that. I want to find a way to disprove his "professional" opinion. I read the Niantic offer agreement, then did a simple math and came to the conclusion that the data transferred to the servers is too small to contain media BUT these calculations are approximate. And I want a definite one.
If there was a way to see what kinds of data this game sends to the servers...

File: 1468689692244.jpg (43KB, 489x522px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 489x522px

>>27249606
Fag

>>27249606
Leave game running for 24h, don't catch anything. Then go spend 24h catching everything you can.
Compare data usage.

>>27249644
24h is too risky with the unstable servers. But 3h is enough (I guess) and walking the same route should do the trick. Thanks, I'll try.