Is Magearna the mythical of this Gen?

>>26862095
Mythical fairy? Yeah. But there are multiple mythicals per gen

>>26862107
>Forgot that Gens 1-3 had only one mythical each.

>>26862117
>implying this is still gen 1 to 3
Not sure about your logic here.

Yes. It's been called a mythical pokémon for months now.

>>26862095

Yes.

>>26862117
Gen III had two, Deoxys used to be a mythical

File: Untitled (2).png (289KB, 1123x877px) Image search: [Google]

289KB, 1123x877px

Yes.

I wanted a dream mythical to focus on things like daydreams and night dreams

I know we have Darkrai and Cressilia but don't they represent the moon cycles?

>>26862198
Thats pretty nice

>>26862198
That theory is fucking stupid, the stuff used to count is very arbitrary. The thing about Victini is probably true as it's its whole concept, the V, but you could say that Manaphy has two antennas, Diancie has 9 gems in total or that Magearna has four eyelashes, and yet it doesn't mean anything.

>>26862198
That theory is more autistic than the clues from National Treasure

>>26862298
Also it left out Shaymin

>>26862298
>The thing about Victini is probably true as it's its whole concept, the V
It's the V for Victory, moron.

>>26862207
Cressellia definitely does. Not sure about Darkrai, but I do see how it could fit into the motif as the New Moon.
That being said, Darkrai is the Pokemon of nightmares - so that's pretty close to dreams.

>>26862434
And why do you think they chose to make a pokemon based on the V for Victory in generation 5 ?
Think for a second you retard.

>>26862457
Because it's the gen set in America.

>>26862467
Say that to Vietnam.