Does this look better?

File: 1464115398623.jpg (141KB, 800x916px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 800x916px

> Pic

File: Amino.jpg (233KB, 1949x1064px) Image search: [Google]

233KB, 1949x1064px

>>26768652

No. The original desgin is better.

>>26768652
Thank you, now I want to change all the designs from gen I to gen VI.

>>26768652
YES. Perfect.

>>26768652
No, it's actually horrible.
Why is it so bad that they want a simplistic look? it's nice.

its head is still too big but it's better

>>26768705
Because everything looks the fucking same.

File: 1466115774928.png (169KB, 600x537px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 600x537px

>>26768652

but that eye is dogshit

>>26768652
Congratulations! You made it look worse! Quit drawing.

>>26768652
Sooooo much better.

>>26768652
The eyes shouldn't be that angry, it looks like a Beedrill now. The only reason Pidgey had eyes like that is that they were standard anime eyes at the time.

The talons make it look like a second evolution.

>>26768733
Oh yeah this is like 68rd woodpecker what the fuck.

>>26768652
It's not cute anymore and it looks like it just got out of a fight.

>>26768748
This, I actually like.

>>26768652
This looks like shit.

>>26768756
it's called determined, not angry

>>26768652
It has less personality like that.

>>26768652
All you did was make it pointier?

>>26768652
CRAAAAAAAWLING IIIIIIN MY SKIIIIIIN

>>26768652
the eyes, feathers around parts of the head aren't necessary, but the rest is a nice touch up.

File: Pikipek_gen1_v2.png (191KB, 600x537px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 600x537px

>>26768652
>>26768748
Here's the original one I made that I believe looks best.
-original eye feathers (probably makes an arrow shape on head when viewed front-on)
-slightly smaller eye with less blue and more depth
-three tail feathers
-only minor other detail additions

I really like Pikipek's design as a whole, but I just wanted the small details like claws and a more feathery look to show through. It's almost like the way another artist would draw it with their slight artistic liberties, though in this case it would also be on the 3D model.

Overall it just makes it look a little more natural and fluffy, as opposed to looking almost like plastic, if that makes any sense.

>>26768652
You probably could've done to make the eye less angular.

File: image.jpg (103KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 800x600px

I fixed it

>>26769111
Birds are ugly.

>>26768756
>The only reason Pidgey had eyes like that is that they were standard anime eyes at the time.

It was much better, along with body proportions. They actually looked like wild life rather than children's drawings.

File: afcaa667680ac3da68c7733d691318fe.gif (399KB, 500x328px) Image search: [Google]

399KB, 500x328px

>>26768652

>>26769164
see >>26769111
birds don't have triangle eyes in real life

File: 250px-495Snivy.png (53KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 250x250px

>people adding spiky feathers and claws to a design that purposely left out spiky feathers and claws
Why does no one on /vp/ not know about character design holy shit

It's cute and simple, which what they were going for, just leave the thing. Make the head slightly smaller if you're that autistic, at least that's not going in the complete opposite direction of the intended outcome.

>>26768652
The eye is too big. It's also too "harsh" for the rest of the design. There's too much going on in the face.

Pikipek looks fantastic, and is a solid step up from Fletchinder. No, it doesn't look like it could be in gen 1. That's not automatically a bad thing.

>>26768652
I prefer yours to be fair

>>26769203
70% of people are this board are 14 and want edgy sharp pokemens
and also not knowing shit about character design
>inb4 you don't have to be a chief to know the food is shit

>>26769245
well of course. I mean you don't have to be a chef to know the food is overcooked.

>>26768652
No, you made it much worse

File: I0000ggk6Ro18G60.jpg (291KB, 1000x667px)

291KB, 1000x667px

>>26769111
It's not a woodpecker it's a red-crested cardinal, found all over Hawaii

>>26769300
there are two levels to this
you can tell when something is brunt or just shit
buttttttttt
every person likes different things and hates different
one person loves sweets and hates spicy
but the other loves spicy and hates sweets
just like
now hear me out bro
some people like simple designs and hate realistic art
and other like realistic and hate simple

SHOCKING OMGZZZZZ

>>26768652
>everything has to be angry

What is this, American Kirby?

>>26769435
Go back to deviant art.

>>26769435

You have to be over 18 to post on this site, buddy.

>>26769424
It hardly looks anything like that bird. Also, look at the feet. Those are very distinctively woodpecker feet.

>>26769515
>>26769503
>tfw i got banned from DA 5 years ago
>tfw i am 20

File: box-art-battles-the-kirby-series-20110907021418993.jpg (150KB, 468x287px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 468x287px

>>26768652
Sweet eyes bro

>>26769245
>if you can't draw better, you have no right to an opinion

This is shit that literally only fourteen years old girls believe.

>>26769529
How the fuck do you get banned from DA? And if you're 20, then act like it.

>>26769529

You should've spent the last 5 years learning to not type like a spaz.

>>26769424
>woodpecker pokemon
>not a woodpecker

>>26768681
>>26768681
>>26768681
>>26768681
>>26768681

>>26769424
Nigga, it's very clearly a fucking woodpecker. Your theory is wrong, accept it and move on.

>>26768939
Yeah that's the best one.

>as opposed to looking almost like plastic, if that makes any sense.

What you're tying to say is that new mons look like they were designed to make the inevitable toy manufacturing process as cheap and easy as possible, which is probably true.

>>26769503
>>>/pol/

>>26768652
You made it worse. Do you know anything about design?

Feathers and talons are better, eyes are worse imo

I like both the evil eyes and the other one OP posted.
It honestly looks great. Don't listen to the gamefreak apologists.

>>26769435
I was playing on how he used "chief" instead of "chef," but ok autismo.

>>26768652

I don't mind the big heads or cutesy eyes. The only thing that bothers me is the overly smooth, geometric anatomy.

this >>26768939 is perfect.

>>26768652
both neat

>>26769813
I want that vulpix so much

I like the hair, but the eyes are shit
Why change the eyes at all?

>>26769813
>that soulless vulpix
>that Pearl/Fearow Pikipek
I can never stop screaming
Pidgey and especially Zorua are cut AF though

>>26769580
Wut?

>>26769813
That pikipek is so horrible, it looks like a zangoose raped a fearow.

>>26769869
>>26769964
Yeah the Pikipek was modelled after Spearow/Fearow.

Rooks same. What was the point

>>26769424
>Pokemon can't be based on more than 1 thing

>>26768681
>>26768705
>>26768749
>>26769600
shit taste

>>26770638
It's clearly just a woodpecker.

>>26768652
I can honestly see this as the mid-evo, which then wil become the Steel-Flying everyone believes will become

>>26770647
You're insane.

>>26770647
>WAAAAAHH PEOPLE DON'T LIKE MY SHITTY "REDESIGN"

>>26768652
>still no mouth

>>26769300
THE FOOD ANALOGY AGAIN ANON
STOPPPPQPPPPPPPPPPPWPWKMNNBBBBPEKPEKPEKPEK

>>26768652
missing charizard eyes

>>26769813
That Pidgey looks good actually.

>>26768939
my favorite

>>26769840
>>26773720
kill yourselves

>>26769813
Want the Zorua like my life depends on it

File: opisafaggot.jpg (117KB, 600x537px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 600x537px

>>26768652
Does this look better?

>>26774036
yes

>>26769424
Huh, it's as if GameFreak takes inspiration from more than one animal in many "real animal" Pokemon designs.

Awful. Looks angsty and edgy, not good for a Route 1 bird at all. Who the Hell looks at Woodpeckers and thinks "man what an edgy fucking bird".

File: 1448922150890.png (513KB, 470x483px) Image search: [Google]

513KB, 470x483px

>>26774036
I WANT THIS ALL OF MY YES

GF PLEASE FUND THIS

File: image.png (182KB, 600x537px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 600x537px

I fixed it even more

File: true eye.png (171KB, 600x537px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 600x537px

>>26774036
i allowed myself to touch this up a bit
i think it's perfect now

>>26768652
Yes, it looks fantastic. The eyes makes it look too mean though, make them less pointy. Other than that, this is a much better design. And all they really had to do was to add feather details. Fucking come on GameFreak.

>>26769566
>blastoise
>shellfish

>cyndaquil
>fire mouse

>>26774821

Blastoise isn't Shellfish in Japanese version. And in Japanese, the words for hedgehogs and porcupine have the word izumi in them, which means mouse.

File: 1419663314668.png (247KB, 539x500px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 539x500px

>people complaining about how overdesign Pokemon are getting for years
>Gen 7 comes out with simple, cute Pokemon that actually look pretty great
>people going out of their way to tack elements onto what is a perfectly decent design

>>26769813
Zorua and Pidget look great

>>26774792
More details is not always better. OP's design is too pointy and busy.

>>26774852
pokemon fans DO NOT know shit about character design, remotely.

>>26768652
Looks overdesigned now.

>>26769573
I think they were designed that way due to 3D modeling.

>>26774781
>>26774781
It actually looks better with gen 1 angry eyes.

Any Pearl edits yet ITT?

>>26769813
I would train that Pidgey

>>26769111
>red AND black
>huge curved talons
>long sharp beak
What was God thinking when he created this edgy piece of shit? Literally crawling in my skin tier.