These Guys Have Been Debunked... Roothoot may be the last leak

File: sarcasm.png (81KB, 198x181px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 198x181px

I for one am shocked.

These are pretty obviously a retrace. They aren't even in the same style as the pics. The colors aren't even the same. Ignoring the circumstantial but farfetched stuff like all the Japanese and only having the one shot. Not to say these are real but it's pretty obvious this guy is just falseflagging. Won't be the first time, and won't even be the first time for leaks that were actually fake, or in other words someone faking that they made a fake.

>>26724317
> This guy happens to know the real artist behind the fake but mentioned it is up to them to reveal it if they want

Okay, he said nothing. So he's lying.

>there are still people holding on to hope that Roothoot and friends are real

Jesus Christ how horrifying

Finally, now can we stop talking about these shit fakes?

>>26724341
>or in other words someone faking that they made a fake.

This desu. Anyone can claim the work without evidences.

Moreover... I am the artist of these fakes!

Not saying they're real, but the "evidence" against them is very debatable

>>26724369
He clearly knows the real artist, so they're fake. No ifs or buts, end of the line.

please I hope Tony The Tiger with Fire Semen action is fake, please.


>Roothoot
delusion

>>26724375
I know the real artist, too.

>>26724368
SHOCK desu ne... !!!!

>>26724386
>Tony the Tiger
>Not Tony El Tigre

>>26724317
>http://devildman.deviantart.com/art/Litten-Final-Evolution-615011190
this looks like a retrace. some details don't seem quite right. lines and corners are weird. he just redrew the concept art, did not at all make the designs. i wish these were debunked, but this isn't a debunk, OP.....

>>26724341
this desu. my first thought once viewing full size. they just traced it. the deviantart user also posted other fakemons. not a debunk!

>>26724317
They're not debunked. Although I don't like them, they guy just traced them. He traced the feminine tumblr ones too.

File: Retard Alert.gif (480KB, 493x342px) Image search: [Google]

480KB, 493x342px

>>26724317
http://devildman.deviantart.com/art/FKMN-Fanart-Bursealio-610471423

But he already drew final evolution already you dumb dumb.

>>26724408
Look at the Rowlet evo one again... The user mentions that they know who made the artist who made the leak but they also take credit for the art on that page... Something doesn't add up... They take credit for the art in the post but say that it was someone elses? What this means is that the art in the post is their own retrace of the leak but they also know who made the original... Plus even if they where making that all up the types don't match up with the leaked types on the Japanese website

>>26724391

What a small world, so do I! But I can't tell any of you who he is though, it'll be up to him if he wants to reveal herself. :^)

If you think Roothoot is real you might just actually be retarded

>>26724317
>Roothoot may be the last leak that hasnt been deconfirmed
What is that one Mothman Pokemon?

>>26724352
Because Roothoot looks very similar to Rowlet (as in extremely similar) despite being leaked ages ago way before Rowlet was revealed... It also looks like a second evolution

File: AwesomeDancing-1449567754.gif (1MB, 428x309px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 428x309px

Hey dudes, I know the artist. But I will not say nothing. Okay? okay.

>>26724473
It does not look similar. The Japanese names were leaked and they already implied that it was going to be an owl. Then Roothoot got 'leaked' and then Rowlet got revealed.

>>26724477
Its called respect and this DA artist is respecting the original artist by not revealing who said artist is

>>26724473
Called the cops

>>26724473

Yeah, no shit, it was because of the trademark registration that suggested the grass starter was an owl. That's why it looks similar, not because it's real.

>>26724486
Roothoot was revealed before the Japanese names...

>>26724494
>Its called respect
It's called being a smug, possibly lying tool for the sake of being a smug, possibly lying tool

>>26724503
No it wasn't

File: 1439203470784.jpg (79KB, 718x382px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 718x382px

>>26724486
>>26724499
>>26724517

I fucking hate you new faggots. Go back to >>>/reddit/. Roothoot leaked March 6th, fucking weeks before we even knew about the trademarks.

>>26724518
The trademarks were registered before we knew about it. Just because we knew later didn't mean anyone else in the world didn't find out before

>>26724530
Trademarks didn't go public until the Trademark Bot tweeted them, dipshit.

>>26724509
Yea that's possible too

File: image.png (444KB, 890x890px) Image search: [Google]

444KB, 890x890px

>>26724518
Still thinking Roothoot is real

>>26724534

Incorrect, they were public, you just had to look them up on the publicly available database. They didn't become widely known until the Twitter bot, but the information was certainly out there.

>>26724534
That's not how it works, anon

>>26724552
Nigger, I know it isn't fucking real; I'm not even that other anon or the OP. I just know that newfaggots saying the trademarks are what inspired Roothoot is wrong. The whole fucking reason Roothoot became a meme in the first place is because it leaked before the trademarks. That's what set it apart from all the other fake grass owls, dumbass.

>>26724568
>>26724559
>Incorrect
I'm fucking laughing.
Do you shits not know how the Trademark Bot works? It's a fucking BOT, for christ's sake. It tweets out the trademarks automatically when they're made public. Do some fucking research.

>>26724317
The guys whole DA is just him tracing other peoples work, not debunked, which sucks, i really like Rowlett but this Litten evo looks great and i haven't used a fire starter ever

>>26724574
Edgy

File: 1435085895169.jpg (25KB, 400x435px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 400x435px

>>26724616
Try reading
>This guy happens to know the real artist behind the fake but mentioned it is up to them to reveal it if they want

>>26724620
>gets called out on bullshit
>buzzword
Pic related. It's for (You).

>>26724616
Lol, he has more retraces on the DA? Even if you didn't have enough brain cells to register that these were, people still couldn't put two and two together if he has other retraces on his page?

I know the original artist too
It's Ohmura Yusuke

>>26724317
>Shut the fuck up. I'm so tired of being disrespected on this goddamn website. All I wanted to do was post my opinion. MY OPINION. But no, you little bastards think it's "hilarious" to mock those with good opinions. My opinion. while not absolute, is definitely worth the respect to formulate an ACTUAL FUCKING RESPONSE AND NOT JUST A SHORT MEME OF A REPLY. I've been on this site for 6 months: 6 MONTHS and I have never felt this wronged. It boils me up that I could spend so much time thinking and putting effort into things while you shits sit around (probably jerking off to Gardevoir or whatever furbait you like) and make fun of the intellectuals of this world. I've bored you? Good for fucking you. Literally no one cares that your little brain is to underdeveloped and rotted to comprehend my idea...MY GREAT GREAT IDEA. I could sit here all day whining, but I won't. I'm NOT a whiner. I'm a realist and an intellectual. I know when to call it quits and to leave the babybrains to themselves. I'm done with this goddamn site and you goddamn immature children. I have lived my life up until this point having to deal with memesters and idiots like you. I know how you work. I know that you all think you're
>"epik trolls" but you're not. You think you baited me? NAH. I've never taken any bait. This is my 100% real opinion divorced from anger. I'm calm, I'm serene. I LAUGH when people imply I'm intellectually low enough to take bait. I always choose to reply just to spite you. I won. I've always won. Losing is not in my skillset. So you're probably gonna reply "lol epik trolled" or "u mad bro" but once you've done that you've shown me I've won. I've tricked the trickster and conquered memery. I live everyday growing stronger to fight you plebs and low level trolls who are probably 11 (baby, you gotta be 18 to use 4chan). But whatever, I digress. It's just fucking annoying that I'm never taken serious on this site, goddamn.

>>26724680
enjoying my popcorn with your salt.

File: That's like your opinion man.jpg (38KB, 555x407px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 555x407px

>Over complicating things

So apparently this guy drew these guys.

Let's just assume he did in fact re-traced them.

Where's the Fan Art tag?

He's outright saying he might possibly know the artist along with a few others because he claims "some of us" while stealing his assumed designs at the same time.

How the fuck would that work, of course he forgot the Fan Art tag because he knows these are original from him and that's why they don't need that tag.

File: what_the_heck.jpg (38KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 640x640px

>>26724680
What's wrong?

>>26724574
Haha yeah anon, and Cactowl is even more legit than Roothoot cuz it leaked YEARS before the trademarks! Gen 7 best gen, three different grass owl starters for sure!

>>26724326
I want to have sex with Marie

>>26724341

Anon, I'm hoping that what I'm about to do with this guy's art goes to the bottom of all this.

Essentially, over saturation, scaling and JPEG artifacts.

File: Noice jawb.png (136KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 250x250px

>>26724968

Yep, it just solidifies the fact that this guy's posted artwork is a re-trace.

A really poor one at that. Didn't even had to do that much either. It's pathetic he's trying to make this his when it's really a poor man's job at re-tracing.

He clearly has a lot of friends, justifiably plenty of them being fakemon artists.

You really just got to find that one friend of his that resembles this artworks' art style. If what he says is true, there are others who know who it is as well.

Fakemon artists don't always work alone on their own. I've seen leaks which have involved two or three people.

If he made the starter finals, don't you think the rest of his fakes would look better? he did not make these.
not saying they are real, but this artist didnt make these

>>26725070
That's not point. He knows the guy who made them. He knows that they're fake.

>>26725274

>He knows the guy who made them.

Proof?

>>26725285
He literally said it in the comments.

>>26725274
Shut the fuck up. I'm so tired of being disrespected on this goddamn website. All I wanted to do was post my opinion. MY OPINION. But no, you little bastards think it's "hilarious" to mock those with good opinions. My opinion. while not absolute, is definitely worth the respect to formulate an ACTUAL FUCKING RESPONSE AND NOT JUST A SHORT MEME OF A REPLY. I've been on this site for 6 months: 6 MONTHS and I have never felt this wronged. It boils me up that I could spend so much time thinking and putting effort into things while you shits sit around (probably jerking off to traps or whatever gay shit you like) and make fun of the intellectuals of this world. I've bored you? Good for fucking you. Literally no one cares that your little brain is to underdeveloped and rotted to comprehend my idea...MY GREAT GREAT IDEA. I could sit here all day whining, but I won't. I'm NOT a whiner. I'm a realist and an intellectual. I know when to call it quits and to leave the babybrains to themselves. I'm done with this goddamn site and you goddamn immature children. I have lived my life up until this point having to deal with memesters and idiots like you. I know how you work. I know that you all think you're "epik trolls" but you're not. You think you baited me? NAH. I've never taken any bait. This is my 100% real opinion divorced from anger. I'm calm, I'm serene. I LAUGH when people imply I'm intellectually low enough to take bait. I always choose to reply just to spite you. I won. I've always won. Losing is not in my skillset. So you're probably gonna reply "lol epik trolled" or "u mad bro" but once you've done that you've shown me I've won. I've tricked the trickster and conquered memery. I live everyday growing stronger to fight you plebs and low level trolls who are probably 11 (baby, you gotta be 18 to use 4chan). But whatever, I digress. It's just fucking annoying that I'm never taken serious on this site, goddamn.

>>26724637
>This guy happens to know the real artist behind the fake but mentioned it is up to them to reveal it if they want
And we should believe him why?

These are obviously fake, but like this anon said >>26724341, that doesn't mean everyone who says they know the truth about them isn't a fake either.

>>26725274
anon.... if he knows the guy who made them, why did he trace them? the answer is he doesn't fucking know.

so he just claims he knows the artist?

Why would someone lie on the Internet?

>>26724403

Nigger, it's Tigre Toño in Mexiland.

>>26724494
Respect? Yet he still spoiled the fun for the artist by confirming they're fake? Fuck that.

>>26725295
Why believe they were real in the first place?
Why believe anything.
Lets believe that we can believe things are not believable.

I also know the artist... See how easy it is to lie on the internet

>>26724341
What this anon said in all quite honesty

>>26725294
much salt?

>>26725291

I think you may not quite understand what "proof" means.

>>26724317
Roothoot was deconfirmed when the starters came out along with his friends.

>>26725291
Okay and how do you know he's not lying?

>>26724473
>Because Roothoot looks very similar to Rowlet (as in extremely similar)
There's literally only two things shared between them, that they're owls and grass, that's it. The brown/cream color isn't even the same shade that is until the revised Roothoot design was made after Rowlet came out.

>>26725604
Why do you assume he is?

>>26725632
for fame

>>26724574
Just because it's a fucking BOT doesn't mean its accurate and updates every second you idiot.

>>26725648
So even if proof was presented you wouldnt believe it cause you'd think they're doing it for fame.

>>26725692
If proof was presented I would believe him.

It's the lack of proof and the fact that he retraced his "friends" art that makes me skeptical.

>>26725711
Wheres the proof its traced?

>>26724317
>It turns out the fakes were fakes the whole time.
SHOKING!!

>>26724534
How did people trademark before twitter

File: IMG_20160613_193050.jpg (36KB, 252x201px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 252x201px

>>26724341
This
Just look at the x in the bow, the lines are shorter than in the original pic

>>26725913
The talons are also a bit off. The original has thicker lines.

>>26725692
Oh you're just a shitposting child resorting to every fallacy in the book.

>>26725944
The tip of the arrow and hoodie, too

>>26725888
>what is reading comprehension
Twitter has nothing to do with the registering of a trademark. It's just now there exists bots that tweet out trademarks when they go public.

File: 1454294894691.jpg (974KB, 2000x2000px) Image search: [Google]

974KB, 2000x2000px

>All of these fuckers in denial
kek

File: 1465613566510.gif (2MB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 480x360px

>>26726014
>not being able to notice how sloppy the tracing work is

>>26726014
I know these are fake but any retard can claim they know the artist without any evidence.

Wait a fucking second, Roothoot is back in the news?

Can't wait to go through more agonizing monrths of constant owlposting.

>>26724317
Roothootfags are almost at 6.5 levels of delusion

>>26725951
Skepticism goes both ways. You look at everything with a criticle eye. You dont arbitrarily believe one part of something is a lie.
And this isnt shitposting. Im just honestly annoyed by all these fakes and people so easily believing things are real.

>>26726138
Nah its just the same shitposter

>>26725291
Someone said it in the Internet? Must be true amirite

It's 100% a trace, and a bad one at that.
Colors are off, instead of cream he used white. He forgot to draw the claws in the talons. The string of the bow is in a different angle and doesn't connect correctly. Extra line added at the back of the hoodie after the last < that connects to the wing holding the string.

Makes sense that the good designs weren't real.

File: Tai-Lung-fire-attack.jpg (243KB, 3840x1636px) Image search: [Google]

243KB, 3840x1636px

>>26724317
Leaked concept art

File: 038_039_by_nachtbeirmann.png (91KB, 700x500px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 700x500px

>>26724473

>IT'S AN OWL AND IT HAS GRASSY COLORS OBVIOUSLY THEY LOOK THE SAME

>>26726237
>scepticism goes both ways
Doesn't give you the right to resort to fallacies

File: image.jpg (40KB, 373x395px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 373x395px

My uncle works for nintendo. He gives me all the games weeks before they are released in irl. This is final evolution of rowlet.

>>26724317
>Posted 2 DAYS ago

Its a RETRACE

File: 1465623307935.png (1MB, 1080x790px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1080x790px

If you think these aren't real, you have over average chromosome number.