Is there any reason why Game Freak, Nintendo and PokemonCo don't want to retcon Unova and Gen 5 as official?
>meme girl from 4chan
>>26705645
Obvious bait aside, what does "Retcon x as official" even mean?
>>26705666
He's right you know.
>>26705645
Because retconing Pokémon is dumb idea.
>>26705696
They did it with Ho-Oh
>>26705730
What?
>>26705730
No. They didn't.
>>26705739
Yes, they also did it with the Misty's Mega Gyarados dream!
>>26705762
No. They didn't.
>>26705668
I *think* OP is trying to imply that Gen 5 is somehow not canon? I don't know where they'd get that idea since people reference Team Plasma in Kalos, but then again, I might have no idea what they're actually trying to say. Either way, they're either a moron, or a moron who has no idea how to properly phrase a question.
>>26705762
That's fanon and you lack knowledge about Pokémon.
>>26705771
That's just like your own subjective headcanon opinion, it's wrong but I respect it to not hurt your feels.
>>26705668
I have no idea, anon.
>>26705730
What are you even talking about?
please end your life immediately
>>26705788
No. It's a fact.
>>26705788
you lack knowledge about Pokémon.
>>26705778
The one you replied to here.
I think he meant he wants GF to make Gen5 non-canon because... who the hell knows.
Gen5posting has become meta-counter-anti-reverse-post-renaissance-baiting at this point.
I heard from somewhere that the devs retconned the Sinnoh lore as no longer being canon when they began Gen V.
Also Phione.
>>26705799
>>26705811
Stop this meme, please.
You are the actual ignorant one about the last Pokemon facts.
>>26705818
don't believe in unofficial sources.
>>26705828
Actually they're right, it's been confirmed that Dialga/Palkia shit didn't actually happen in the Pokeverse.
>>26705823
You are starting to piss me off!
Game freak never did none of that.
I know OP is just having a giggle with us, but isn't it annoying when people enter conversation, interject with patently wrong statements, and when presented with counter-evidence they tersely respond with things like, "No." and "That's wrong"?
>>26705840
Go away. You brain wash fools.
>>26705840
Now I'm invested.
>>26705841
Acting edgy on this hilariously hostile site doesn't prove your argument, try harder.
>>26705844
welcome to anonymous conversations on the internet
there's a ton of potential to have a genuine, unfiltered conversation here, but most of the time you'll get shit that amounts to "no you"
>>26705857
Misty never had Mega Gyarados dream.
You people are brain wash fools.
>>26705870
Yes, she did, she has witnessed a Mega Gyarados silhouette in the sea.
>>26705856
fuck your shitty meme
>>26705881
Lies.
>>26705881
That was no Mega Gyarados.
>>26705909
Yes it clearly was its beta art.
>>26705882
Nice argument lel
>>26705762
>!
/out/
>>26705844
You know what they say about internet arguments
>>26705778
There's difference between canon and tribute to fans.
>>26705918
No. It wasn't.
Enough, Games. We both know that wasn't a Gyarados.
>>26705816
Eh, I have no idea. If that *is* what he was trying to say then my second statement stands. He's a moron who has no idea how to form an intelligible sentence. Makes no difference to me.
>>26705942
That's a nice thought. Plasma discussed specifically as causing trouble in Unova a few years ago = It fucking happened. Stop grasping at straws to try and validate your incorrect opinion by claiming that a direct reference is simply "a tribute to fans". Link in the inn in Mario RPG was a tribute to fans. An NPC specifically talking about the events of a previous game is both a moment of fan service and confirmation that the subject of the statement was canon. Oh, and also the fact that nothing has stated that gen 5 wasn't canon ever. There's always that.
>>26705782
>Posting cameltoe Sapphire
I hate her personality so much but her body is just 10/10 HHHHNNNNNNNGGGGGGHHHHHG
>>26706105
Oh ok.