Attention Zodiacfags

>>26617920
The same reason they made Torterra after Blastoise, dumbass.

File: 653Fennekin.png (761KB, 864x1280px) Image search: [Google]

761KB, 864x1280px

>>26617920
because this debunked the theory

>>26617920
>only one snake species exists in the world

Bloody anti-zodiacfags with their fucktarded arguments.

File: tObk4C7[1].png (670KB, 617x776px) Image search: [Google]

670KB, 617x776px

>>26617935

No, the Cyndaquil family did, because echidnas, stoats, and badgers are not rats.

>not asking why they're calling an echidna a mouse

>>26617954
MOUSE
TYPE
POKEMON

>>26617920
Because they didn't want Smugleaf to evolve into another grassy dinosaur.

I would have taken a t-rex actually, maybe a raptor if they could pull it off right

>>26618832
>maybe a raptor
Grovyle and Sceptile? They're clearly not just geckos anymore, especially after how blatant and clearly Treecko was a gecko. Grovyle especially is raptor-like, Sceptile is just more generically theropod like.

>>26617920
Serperior is a worm, not a snake.

>>26617954
And the award for the most retarded post goes to this anon. Congratulations.

>>26618537
and Charmander and Fennekin are the Lizard and Fox type Pokemon. Pokedex means nothing when you call Machop the "superpower pokemon"

The zodiac nonsense has never had any weight. Not even Charizard fits, since he's a western dragon. Chinese longs aren't dragons, and are only called so for western convenience.
Zodiacfags are the same type of morons who think Cubone is a baby Kangaskhan.

>>26618854
>serpent

>>26618885
So, you're implying that you know better than Gamefreak?

>>26618939
Nearly every single dragon type in pokemon is a western style dragon, you dirty spic

>>26618959
No, you're the one implying that the zodiac is real when GF has said nothing. What I am saying is that the pokedex classifications shouldn't be used to back that up because it leads to cherrypicking of evidence.

>>26619093
>when GF has said nothing

GF has also said nothing about Pikachu clones, early bug pokemon etc etc

The fact that the new fire starter is a feline pretty much confirms it

>>26619130
and the fact that gen 2 and gen 6 starters don't fit pretty much disproves it.

>>26619182
>gen 2

Mouse Pokemon

>gen 6

Canine Pokemon

???

>>26619197
foxes aren't dogs

>>26619197
>gen 1

Lizard pokemon, not a dragon

>echidnas and foxes are dogs now!

>>26618537
Is blastoise a shellfish?

>>26619225
Why are you being purposefully retarded?

>>26619214
but dogs are canines. I know it's hard for you to wrap your head around creative design, but a psychic fox is better than a psychic dog.

>>26619291
but foxes arent dogs my dude so they dont count

>>26619291
Foxes aren't dogs.
Not in taxonomy, and definitely not in eastern folklore.

>>26617920
memes

>>26619291
is blastoise a shellfish???????

>>26619197
>Fennekin
>Canine Pokemon

It's the "Fox pokemon"

dumb fuck

>>26619301
They're pretty closely related.

>>26619291
A square is a rectangle, but a rectangle isn't inherently a square, dumbass

Ergo, a dog is a canine, but not all canines are dogs

>>26619294
>>26619301
>>26619348

>hyperbole

If it had been a monkey or an elephant, then I would understand. But it was a Fox, and a Fox is a canine.


>>26619305
What does it have to do with this?

>>26619360
>and a Fox is a canine.

Nope

Foxes are vulpine you retard, this is basic biology

File: 1435937538091.jpg (34KB, 430x478px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 430x478px

>This dumb thread again

The pokedex clarifies Cindaquill a Fire MOUSE pokemon

the only thing that it a stretch is Fennekin which is obviously based on a Fennec Desert Fox, although it's from the Canidae family.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canidae

>>26619360
foxes aren't canines

My only real beef with the Zodiac idea is that when people point out that Cyndaquil isn't a mouse, people use its Pokedex type to establish its claim. When non-believers use Charmander and Fennekin's Pokedex types to disprove the theory afterward, they're met with "but that's different!"

>>26619383
Which are canines

>>26619394
Oh man and I bet Blastoise is actually a clam too because the pokedex says so!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>>26619394
>Species in the english translation is canon to a japanese Videogame

>>26619432
Canidae =/= canine

vulpines and canines are separate

File: Untitled.png (382KB, 1554x360px) Image search: [Google]

382KB, 1554x360px

>>26619430
Huh....well I guess try calling Google or the Encyclopedia Britannica. Tell them they're wrong, Apparently foxes are no longer accepted as canines

>>26619474
Canidae aren't canines

>>26619474
Raccoon dogs arent even closely related to dogs or foxes, so yes, google is wrong

>>26619515
>>26619457
>>26619537
All right. I guess one of you better call the UN and tell them. A big scientific breakthrough was just made here on /vp/


Science is wrong, you're right

File: 1444563147474.jpg (210KB, 1080x1068px) Image search: [Google]

210KB, 1080x1068px

>It's a "Foxes and Dogs are both canine/canidae, so therefore Foxes ARE Dogs!" thread
Just watch as Litten turns into a lion and Zodiacfags say "Lions ARE Tigers!"

>>26619537
>>26619515
Forgot /vp/ was filled with Biology PhD's.

>>26619562
You just went full retard my man

>>26619592
Now you know.

>>26619592
You only need to take high school bio to understand this shit

>>26618850
Sceptile-M literally has a detachable tail, a signature trait of leaf-tailed and other gecko.
Congrats, youre a retard.

>>26619586
They're basically the same thing, honestly. Big cats regardless of the minor details are still just big cats.

>>26619586
I actually don't care about all this autism.

But they will, with something like this
"But both Tigers and Lions are Panthera, so it works!"

>>26619562
The term "canine" refers the the genus "canis"

Raccoon dogs are part of the nyctereutes genus, Foxes are part of the vulpes genus

Dogs and wolves are the only animal part of the canis genus, foxes are not

>>26619562
>>26619592
But >>26619515 is correct. Canidae aren't canines but canines are canidae. Why are you acting like this?

>>26619474
>google as a source

you have truly lost your mind