is she a hooker or a prostitute

A hookstitute

>>26447414
Canonically?
None of them.

NPCs don't have 18+ relationship with the player characters.

>>26447414
Anon please don't be mean to your mom

>>26447431
define that word, which you speak.

>>26447448
Impossible, since. Original Poster don't exist in the Pokémon Earth in Pokémon Universe.

I think she's a doxy, actually.

She's hot

>>26447462
Canonically, she isn't.

>>26447472
Okay but what do Glaceon's paws feel like?

>>26447491
I want to lick them. Would you lick them?

F L A T A S S
L
A
T

A
S
S

>>26447477
I have no interest in answering that kind of question and That's not important to this topic.

>>26447497

No. I have no interest in that.

File: 1385163285075.png (591KB, 600x584px) Image search: [Google]

591KB, 600x584px

>>26447504
Oh come on, don't be embarrassed.

File: CGK7gksUsAAP9dM.png orig.png (300KB, 877x787px) Image search: [Google]

300KB, 877x787px

>>26447514
But you won't know what they taste like until you try.

>>26447517

Inaccurate drawing of Glaceon and Seriously, I'm not sexually arousing by that Pokémon.

I have no interest in that.

>>26447536

I don't know, since the Pokédex haven't told me.

File: BkTN5ErCcAAvypF.jpg orig.jpg (45KB, 644x602px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 644x602px

>>26447537
So you wouldn't play around with a Glaceon?

>>26447546

It hasn't been officially confirm that a Human can breed with a Pokémon.

File: COdzkU1UEAAlmJ5.jpg orig.jpg (54KB, 626x885px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 626x885px

>>26447555
We're talking about playing around, though. Like they do in the day-care.

>>26447561
Breeding mechanic are not part of Pokémon lore, therefore is non-canon.

File: 30559133_p0.png (718KB, 1120x630px) Image search: [Google]

718KB, 1120x630px

>>26447572
So what are you trying to say?

File: Pokétch - Day_Care_Checker_(1).png (16KB, 256x384px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 256x384px

>>26447580

Pokémon don't actually breed in the Day care at all.

Pokémon just play around with other Pokémon.

File: BTAXUaPCEAAglt3.png orig.png (280KB, 831x684px) Image search: [Google]

280KB, 831x684px

>>26447596
I was talking about playing around with Glaceon, though.

>>26447609
1. No, since Human can't go in the Pokémon Day care at all.

2. Just because, Pokémon don't breed in the Pokémon Day care, doesn't mean that Pokémon can't breed at all.

>>26447609
>>26447580
>>26447561
>>26447536
>>26447517
>87.5 % of glaceons are male

Yea, poor glaceonfags have hard life

File: 680818631.jpg (41KB, 584x664px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 584x664px

>>26447696
Mine's female.

>>26447695
So you're saying I can breed with my Glaceon? That's even better.

>>26447730
There is no evidence that a Human can breed with a Pokémon.

File: CRHjBj0U8AA8g0a.png orig.png (248KB, 1200x1600px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 1200x1600px

>>26447743
But in the past, they've gotten married. I'd say that points more toward "can and did" than "can't".

>>26447730
Fuck off bui

>>26447753
Getting Marrying doesn't mean sex.

File: COjMy-2UAAADzr_.png orig.png (1MB, 1165x1357px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1165x1357px

>>26447755
>bui
>females

File: 50572190_p0.png (1MB, 1850x1704px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1850x1704px

>>26447766
Sure, and going to a bar doesn't mean drinking, what's your point?

>>26447778
It hasn't been officially been confirm that a Human can breed with a Pokémon.

Egg groups. They exist.

File: 29071981_p1.png (380KB, 586x796px) Image search: [Google]

380KB, 586x796px

>>26447796
I'm willing to find out.

>>26447769
Whatever, being a furry with shit taste is only slightly less worse than being a faggot furry with shit taste

>>26447805
You can't, Since. you are not Game freak.

File: reaction bugs king.jpg (28KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 400x400px

>>26447766
>>26447743
>>26447695
>>26447596
>>26447572
>>26447555
>>26447545
>>26447537
>>26447514
>>26447504
>>26447472
>>26447441

Jesus Christ who is this guy lmaoooo

File: 37483558.png (1MB, 887x1229px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 887x1229px

>>26447835
His name is Dick and he's a spic. Probably.

File: a302924d772ef7e86d8e5ad959bc1272.png (273KB, 645x354px) Image search: [Google]

273KB, 645x354px

Heard ya guys were talking about breedin'~

>>26447796
It doesn't change the fact that in many people's minds, they can write about having sex with pokémon, they can draw it, they can talk about it, and what's canon does not matter.

>>26447414
stop sexualizing glaceon, glaceon is nto for hot sex, glaceon is cold so use it to chill yourself in hot day just by hugging it.

>>26447893
Canon = truth.

hookers and prostutes r the same thing dumbis

>>26447966
But people can still imagine, write, draw things that are not canon. And you can't do anything about that.

>>26447414
She's on the higher end of hooker but not quite on the level of a prostitute. You can tell she doesn't charge much money because if she did she'd pay for a bigger ass than that underwhelming backside she's got now.

>>26447414
POKEMON ROZA

>>26447414
A hooker? more like... *sunglasses* a Looker. (YEEEEEEAAAAH!!)

>>26448175
Could you please go back to the year 2010

>>26447835
Yeah he's fucking this place up worse than that gay porn last week. That was a least funny

>>26448154
Fan fiction sucks.
You don't understand the beauty of canon info.

>>26448362
You do understand that nobody gives a shit and everybody wants you gone ?
You just ruin every single thread you go to.

>>26448487

I've done no internet crime here.

>>26448503
You ruin everyone's fun with shitty canon info. Let us discuss if the girl in the OP is a prostitute or a hooker without bringing canon in it, since this thread is OBVIOUSLY not about canon.
Get the fuck out of here.

Based canonanon is at it again. I unironically love you, man.

>>26447414
Please do not make fun of Adult Bonnie's sense of fashion.

>>26448550
Please don't do that. I don't want him to ruin any more threads. This place is already terrible enough without having to see his bullshit canon in every single thread.
I want to like this board. But I can't, and he's part of the reason why.

>>26448564
Nah he's funny.

I'm with >>26448550

He contributes far more to this board than, for example, the furfag he's "arguing" with in this thread

>>26448594
How does he contribute to anything besides shitposting about "canon" crap and derailing threads ? I'd rather have shit threads than see everything go to crap like that. Especially since he's apparently been shown to ban evade and he's probably underage anyway.

>>26448635

The difference between shitposting and what I'm now calling "canonposting" is he's posting without consciously deciding to lower the quality of the board as a whole. He simply contributes what facts he decides might be relevant and people like you lose their shit over it for no reason. How is that derailing? The autist who brought up Glaceon is the only person in this thread who's done anything of the sort.

The fact is he's hilarious, a beacon of light and good intentions that shines in whatever thread he enters. Nothing "goes to crap" unless the people who obsess over him try to argue against what he perceives as canon, which would make them the derailers, not Richard. Do you really think one guy going "That hasn't been confirmed yet" makes "everything go to crap" or somehow lowers the quality of /vp/ as a whole? If you're really that buttflustered about what he does, I don't know what to tell you.

>>26448797
The problem is that he's doing it all the time. It's like that one kid in elementary school that wanted to come into everyone's group to always talk about the same shit. Sure, it might've been interesting, but at this point it's impossible to just see him without getting angry at the sight of his very presence.

>its an 'anons fall for richards bait' thread

>>26448864
I can't tell if they're playing along or really don't realize he's just trying to become the next "big troll".

>>26448824

It's only impossible for you. Poor Richard has done nothing worth drawing your ire, and yet you think of him as an invasive presence that shouldn't be allowed on /vp/. Maybe you should reconsider what you regard as "quality posting" before you continue posting here yourself.