Post YFW both Owlfags and 6.5 fags got BTFO at the same time

>>26275038
Is S&M confirmed to be gen 7 though? In the trailer it seems to be using the same engine as XY/ORAS

Don't forget
>Charizardboxmascotfags
>Mexicofags
>Spainfags

File: FinallyAfterALongSeriesOfThisBelovedCartoonTheCatPrevails.gif (2MB, 170x123px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 170x123px

>tfw Zygarde cover fags got BTFO

>>26275125
You forgot Chinafags

Updated BTFO list:

>Owlfags
>6.5 fags
>Charizardboxmascotfags
>Mexicofags
>Spainfags
>Zygardecoverfags
>Chinafags

7 kinds of fags BTFO at the same time.

Anything else

>>26275116
FUCK OFF WE ARE NOT HAVING THIS CONVERSATION

>>26275262
Rude. I'm not even a gen 6.5 fag. I just wanted to know.

File: 1462949549489.gif (3MB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 480x270px

>MFW both Owlfags, "Roothoot is a real leak!" and Denialfags, "They'd never make a stupid Grass Owl!" got BTFO and both sides keep saying the other got BTFO

>>26275372
>Implying Denialfags said that

>>26275333
New starters = New Gen

Gen 5 was hardly different from Gen 4 and it was still a new generation because of new starters.

>>26275038
You're fucking retarded if you actually believe anyone believed the fake owl bullshit.

Gen 6.5 stuff seemed more like a wishful thinking than anyone believing it would happen too, especially after the game logos got revealed.

>>26275372
I never denied that they'd make a grass owl. I just denied that they'd make a Pokémon, let alone a starter, as retarded-looking as Roothoot. The name just made it worse. Seriously, Roothoot had no beak, just a creepy triangular flap of flesh. How the hell would you sell that? Rowlet actually looks good.

>>26275038
How the fuck did owlfags get btfo? I see an owl, if not a shittier one than roothoot.

>>26275333
Trips confirm

Not 6.5 fag

>>26275432
The design is really close to the fake one too. If I was an owlfag I'd celebrate desu

File: tumblr_inline_o6bpv2dLxz1qhg2eh_400.jpg (105KB, 240x404px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 240x404px

>>26275397
>>26275429
Next you'll tell me Owlfags always believed Roothoot was concept art and would differ from the final design.

>>26275432
They said that Roothoot, Nyabbi and Cubble were all real. None of them are.

Denialfags said they weren't. They were not

2+2=4 anon

>>26275455
>really close

I can give you the species and coloration. But everything else is different

File: 1455400215753.jpg (79KB, 571x542px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 571x542px

>>26275372
Everyone knew an owl was likely as soon as the names were trademarked. Everyone also knew that the specific owl going around along with Cubble and the other one were fake.

File: pokemon_254.png (123KB, 322x520px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 322x520px

>>26275432
>Shittier one than roothoot.

Do you honestly believe that the autistic Finn owl, that was shoved down the board for weeks, has a significantly better design than Rowlet?

>>26275484
Who cares what they said? No one actually unironically believed it was real, end of story. The shitposters just noticed that people like OP get mad at the fake owl spam so they started flooding the catalog with this garbage. It's the exact same mechanism that made female G0odra spam a thing.

>>26275432
Because owlfags where promoting 3 abominations.
We knew we where getting a grass owl, but people latched on to that shitty leak like it was the real deal.

>Owlfags cry "B-but we got an owl!"
>Reasonable individuals retaliate; "It was not the specific creature you adamantly advocated as the real leak, nor were the other two creatures real."
>Owlfag response; "I-It is still an owl! Denialfags b-b-btfo!"

I'm on neither side, but it really seems like the owlfags are the most hurt over this. I would be too if my design was close, but worse in design and proven wrong. Cut the poor kids some slack.

>>26275239
Better names
>Charboxfags
>Zygardefags

>>26275599
>people latched on to that shitty leak like it was the real deal
No they didn't.
You got trolled son.

>>26275657
see >>26275549

>>26275532
at least roothoot isn't a ball that needs kicking

>>26275038
>and 6.5 fags

Did they? The argument was about battle compatibility. This still hasn't been disproven.

File: image.png (73KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 400x400px

>>26275038
>Owlfags
>btfo
How? We have an owl starter.

>>26275116
We saw this coming though. /vp/ said as soon as 3D was announced that once GF got to full 3D they'd barely even change the engine.

I'm going to miss the sprites being at least a little different every new game.

>Owlfags say roothoot is real
>Spam the boards for weeks about it
>Rowlet is revealed
>They do a complete 180, "w-well, it's still a gr-grass owl!"

>>26275038
>owl confirmed
>owlfags btfo

wat

>>26276417
You're confusing those who said the starter would be an owl with those who intentionally shitposting because it's 4chan. Lurk more.

>>26276440
>lurk more
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH

>>26276320
DPP and BW2 had no battle compatibility and SM, like BW2, introduces new pokemon and moves.

>>26276459
>wants to make an argument
>doesn't have enough basis on side to make valid argument
>laughs at the thought of not being an ignorant fucklord

You belong on /asp/

>>26276320

>implying battle compatibility decides a generation

OR/AS were 6.5. The fact of the matter is this: Even if there's some compatibility between them, it'll be as strained as R/B/Y with G/S/C. Two separate generations, with some limited compatibility.

No, adding limited battle capacity wouldn't change a thing about that argument. Adding one more limited feature to a list of limited features doesn't help or hurt it.