Gen 6.5

>>2624930
all I know is that if gf chooses to pretend zygarde and the 5 forms they gave it arent a thing they are way more retarded than I thought.

I stilll argue it's going to be trade/battle compatible but I don't reallt give a shit what gen people call it anymore. Visual distinction from XY/ORAS and new starters are enough.

>>26249494
Why on EARTH would it be trade/battle compatible? What has given you ANY idea that this would be the case?

>>26249524
Exactly 2 Pentagon slots, zygarde moves, floette

>b-but unused
They have literally no reason to leave them unused when there was just a zygarde event where they could have thrown the moves in.

>>26249606
And also, the souvenir. The fact that it's an item and obviously references the Alola region in being a Tiki sort of implies you can trade it to SM and unlock something.

>>26249301
Unless they give us ~150 new mons, no matter what you call it, gen 6 or gen 7, SuMo and XY will be the worst mainseries games