Gen Pokemon designs from Best to Worst

File: you IRL.jpg (62KB, 400x240px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 400x240px

>>25855964
(you)

>>25855964
came for the sylveon gif. now my business here is done

>>25855964
>objective

>>25855977
If you continue to deny that gen 6 had the best mon designs then I'm afraid you're the one that actually deserves a (you).

Sylveon, Pyroar line, Pangoro line (we never even got a panda pokemon till gen 6 btw!), Fennekin line, Furfrou, Meowstic line, Gogoat line, Goodra line, Florges FUCKING MEGA DESIGNS LIKE MEGA ALTARIA, MEGA GARDEVOIR AND MEGA AUDINO WHICH TURNED A POKEMON INTO A LITERAL MAGICAL GIRL, HOW IS THAT NOT GOD-TIER?!?!

I'm afraid there is no hope for those that can't see that gen 6 had best mon designs, they are literally retarded.

>>25855998
Anyone tho who puts gen 5 first and gen 6 last when it comes to ranking mon designs is objectively autistic yes.

>>25856022
>objectively

Also to explain my ranking gen 3 in the middle, its because I firmly believe it is the gen that is the most hit or miss. When this gen hits, it hits like no other fucking gen ever! (Milotic, Delcatty line, Altaria line, Flygon, Salamence, FUCKING GARDEVOIR LINE!) But then you also have some real fucking misses almost on gen 5-tier such as Ludicolo and the Regices.

Objectively its the gen that deserves its spot in the middle the most considering its the gen that has the highest highs but also some of the lowest lows deisgn wise.

File: 1456597732642.jpg (60KB, 480x386px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 480x386px

>>25856055
>He doesn't like mariachi pineapple kappa

>>25856053
Because a fucking bag of jumbled trash or a drawing with two rocks stacked together with no face can legitimately be "~subjectively~" compared to a highly detailed and well-cartoonized fire lion that has its mane represent amiright?

File: 86eee84b1873f49daa021f8a277fa798c51e187196cf949cb6a4a9a741911fca_3.jpg (13KB, 228x228px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 228x228px

>>25855980
o, never mind.
looks like /vp/eeps are talking some ill shit.
better stay & watch

>>25856071
*has its mane represent flames I meant.

>>25855964
Who cares about this ranking shit, each Gen has a satisfactory handful of cool mons.

>>25855964
>Shitting on bug gen
>Praising Mega gen
Absolutely not.

>>25855964
Anon do you know the meaning of the word "objective"?

My list (SUBJECTIVE)

2=3>5>4>6>1

>5 at the bottom

wew haven't seen this hivemind facebook tier meme before

>>25856085
dililililililililili-wooooooop!

>>25856071
Yes. That's what subjectivity is. You have no facts. You have no clear cut data to prove the concept. It's only opinion and that's all it can ever be.

>>25856069
>He likes a design that's supposed to be about MONSTERS based on real-life stereotypes of PEOPLE

I bet its thanks to fags like you that we even had that disgusting excuse of a "Pokemon" roster for gen 5.

>>25856090
>Putting 6 that low
>Putting 5 and 4 that high

Clearly you don't. Or are you really going to tell me that mons like fucking Magnezone or Stunfisk are better designed then mons like Goodra or Sylveon?

>>25856100

Hoennfags are always so angry.

>>25856107
Yes.

>>25856100
You mean like literally every single human-like pokemon sense gen 1?

>>25856100
>>25856107
oldfags out in a taskforce. stay safe.

>>25856096
Contrary to popular belief art is NOT "subjective" at least when it comes to the design side. There's basic anatomy rules you have to follow in order to even get anywhere, or good luck continuing to draw stick figures and trying to pass it off as "art!"

>>25856115
How am I a Hoennfag when I put it smack dab in the middle of my list? I don't think its the best but I don't think its the worst either, it has about an equal ratio of good to badly designed mons.

If anything you should be calling me a Kalosfag anon.

>>25856129
oh yes
im sure a /vp/ mouth breater knows more about design than professional designers
mmmmmmmm

File: 1449905205158.png (212KB, 553x485px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 553x485px

>>25855964
>claims to post objective fact
>doesn't
Let me fix that for you.

4 > 3 = 5 > 2 > 1 > 6

File: Tita bait.gif (706KB, 449x197px) Image search: [Google]

706KB, 449x197px

>>25856122

File: Volcarona.full.1961826.jpg (765KB, 720x1020px) Image search: [Google]

765KB, 720x1020px

>>25856129
They don't make 'em like they used to.

File: 2a5.jpg (211KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

211KB, 640x640px

>>25855964
>>25856013
>>25856055
>>25856071
>>25856100
>>25856107
>>25856129
>>25856143
>Waaah people don't think my opinion is fact!

>>25856129
You are wrong.
All that matters is who the art resonates with. Whether by visually representing reality as closely/vividly as possible or by trying to apply abstract concepts in a visual medium. There are no rules, only tools.

>>25856147
>6 in last
>4 in first
>5 so fucking high

Here's (your) reply!

4>6>5(Original Desing)3=1>2>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>5("CloneMons" likely Machamp=Conkedurr)

>>25856171
Are you having a stroke anon?

File: 2spooky.gif (9KB, 162x127px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 162x127px

>>25856165
It's like the Angerlympics up in this bitch. And it looks like Baitistan didn't boycott this year.

>>25856125
I acknowledged that gen 1 had some pretty bad designs, more so then even gen 2. (Looking at YOU Executor line, Voltorb line, Electabuzz and Magnemite!) I just put it so high based entirely on the ratio of good/amazing designs to bad.

>>25856171
I personally liked 5's reimagining of gen 1 mons.

>>25856143
kalosperms are underaged furfags
hoenniggers are attention whores
johtoddlers are immature
genwunners are balding

>inb4 angry (chose one of the above)fag retaliation

>>25856171
Oh I am laffin

>>25856165
>ITT: People can't into factual design and anatomy 101 and want to have their shit-taste validated.

>>25855964
I notice there's a lot of plebs in here so I'm gonna give the only right answer.

1=2=3=5=6>4

>>25856185
Also, Sinnohshits are retards and Unovabortions are reddit-teir. Everbody sucks. Except for spinoff gentlemen.

>>25856185
What does that make Unovabortions and Sinnohfetuses then? Especially considering their two gens have the worst designed mons out of all the rest?

1-Nidoking
2-Tyranitar
3-Sceptile
4-Luxray
5-Hydreigon
6-Trevenant

>>25856182
Not the point I'm making. I'm saying MONSTERS based on stereotypes of PEOPLE is a staple of the series sense its conception. It is a long standing part of the core concepts when it comes to designs, from Abra to Volbeat

>>25856203
>6 that low
>5 above it even!

Fuck, the genwunner meme is real!

>>25856222
Doesn't change the fact that Pokemon like Ludicolo are still fucking ugly as shit compared to some of the other mons based on that niche.

Actual Gen teirlist:
6=1=2=5=3[spoiler=]4

>>25856223
>exclamation marks!

>>25856185
>Call people names.
>Try to cover your ass to prevent retaliation.
Remarkable.

>>25856229
Subjective.
And not at all the point I was trying to make/care about.

File: image.jpg (35KB, 598x405px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 598x405px

>>25856218
Daily reminder you never see Unovaginas or Sinnohemorrhoids as mad as the jealous genwunners whos designs got retconned, the angry johtoddlers whos limelight got stolen by unova, or the hoenniggers who hate that sinnoh completely ripped off their story and yet still managed to do it better

>>25856223
>=

>>25856231
Why is 3 below the Unovabortion roster when it gave us some of the most well-renowned and god-tier designed mons in Poke history (i.e. Gardevoir, Altaria, Salamance, Milotic)

By contrast gen 5 has absolutely no god-tier mons to speak of.

>>25856244

T H I S
H
I
S

>>25856249
you goddamn shitposter learn the difference between = and >

>>25856249
I...disagree.

Ok but seriously, here's the real list

3 > 5 > 2 = 4 > 1 = 6

File: 5bc.png (40KB, 625x626px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 625x626px

>>25856249
They are literally equal you-

Aw fuck, I took the bait. Good Job OP.

>>25856249

attention whoring hoennigger detected

>WAHHHH EVERYBODY LOVE MY GEN

>>25856257
But do you objectively disagree?

>>25856244
I'm not either of those three tho anon, the OP should've made it clear that I'm a Kalosfag -at least when it comes to the designs- so how do you explain me?

Perhaps you're just shit at art and can't tell the difference between poorly designed garbage versus aesthetically pleasing?

>>25856244
couldnt have said it better myself. saving this weaponry.

>>25856261
Yes. I objectively disagree with the subjective opinion. Which makes my own overall view, subjective.

>>25856262
Merely a subjective stance.

>>25856262

Are you saying you're as good at art as Ken sugimori?

Really?

I know what kalospergs are. delusional. Explains the Z and 6.5 faggotry.

File: image.png (37KB, 718x479px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 718x479px

>>25855964
>genwar thread

>>25856271
Alright, you get a pass.

>>25856276
>implying 6.5ers played Gen 6

>>25856258
If you don't have 6 somewhere at the top and 5 somewhere in the fucking bottom then I'm sorry but your opinion on art will never be taken seriously.

The first three gens can be scrambled around for all I care, THAT I agree is subjective. But putting the best designed gen at the bottom and the worst designed one near the top just shows you're either blind, legitimately autistic or just being a contrarian faggot. (Which I suspect is the latter considering putting that almost equal to gen 5 abortion known as the Sinnoh roster above fucking gen 1; even though you seem to acknowledge Sinnoh isn't good at all!)

File: db7.png (117KB, 680x528px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 680x528px

>>25856287

File: 1459221008013.jpg (179KB, 979x862px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 979x862px

>>25856287

5>4>3>2>1>6

>>25856276
Except most of the gen 5 designs were done by a fucking westerner? (Which probably explains why they're so shit!)

>>25856287
Honestly, what's wrong with Gen 5 Pokemon? Want me to name some Gen 5 Pokemon fans absolutely adore so you can "objectively" pick each one apart and tell us why it's shit?

File: 128e.jpg (137KB, 959x809px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 959x809px

>>25856287
>>25856305

Why do you keep using exclamation in your posts! You're so obviously underaged! Nobody cares that X and Y were your first gen, new friend! Nobody! Welcome to Pokemon!

>>25856302
Dawn was a shit girl too by the way, literally a carbon-cut paste copy of May.

File: Objective Opinions.png (1MB, 900x1850px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 900x1850px

Since OP seems to want to discuss Gen V so much, here's the list of objectively good and bad Gen V designs.

>>25856307
>Response about Trubbish and pokemon based on older mons.

>>25856310
If I was underaged why would I have gens 1, 2 and 3 so high then?

>>25856314

>Palpitoad
>Literally Bro: The Frog

Disregarded.

>>25856322
>response based on convergent evolution

>>25856314
If you're implying ganonpig is bad and armor otter is good, then I disagree but respect your right to form your own tastes.

>>25856314
Which colors represent shit and good?

>>25856325

Because you're also trying to fit in and be cool. You probably got into Pokemon from X and Y, then after letting a bunch of Poketubers alienate you, you decided that the classics (1-2) and Emulators: The Gen were your other favorites.

It's always the same deal. You love the oldies, love the new shit, hate what's in between for no rational reason.

File: 1459991456042.jpg (421KB, 1024x983px) Image search: [Google]

421KB, 1024x983px

Here's my opinion on gen 5. If you disagree I'll have no choice but to allow you to have your own opinion.

>>25856335
How dare you think like a rational, well-adjusted adult!

Best to worst:

>2,4
>3
>1
>6
>5

>>25856354
Shit, forgot to underline Joltik and Galvantula in gold. Joltik and Galvantula rock.

5>2>6>4>1>3

>>25856328
>implying toads are frogs

File: BarneyF.jpg (37KB, 185x231px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 185x231px

ok, now this is starting to get really boring.
later, faggots

>>25856365
>implying gen vi is canon

>entire gens are either good or bad
>implying you can actually rate individual designs based on generation accurately

>>25856380
There's a canon?

>>25856343
Nice try bub but no dice!

Been playing Poke since I got Red, Blue and a gameboy as my 6th birthday present, am 24 now. Played through all the gens at least once and even grew up with the "Electric tale of Pikachu manga!" (Daisy Mctits Oak is best girl btw!)

I'm sorry you're just stuck in that rebellious "edgy" teen phase where you have to go along with the bandwagon and hate on the newest gens all while simultaneously praising the shit ones because being a hipster and a contrarianfag is apparently "in" with you young'uns eh?

TD;LR: Please get the hell off my lawn and try looking at things objectively based on basic anatomy and art design classes rather then just on your "~feelings~" kay?

File: 0e4.png (81KB, 623x623px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 623x623px

>>25856387

>>25856387
>hipster
>contrarian

Filling out your buzzword bingo card, eh?

>>25856354
>Audino bad
>Sawk, Throh, Durant and Heatmor not crossed out in red
>Whimsicott and Liligant line not in green
>Zoruark line not in green
>Roganrola line not in red
>FUCKING GARBADOR LINE AS "GREAT"

Truly the shittiest of shit-tier taste; as expected of Unovabortions!
>Fucking Palpitoad line in green!

>>25856408

>>25856406
Why don't you try telling me how old YOU are and YOUR history with Pokemon then?

Oh wait, you can't cause you're the one that's the real underage here!

>>25856380
>implying gen v is

Even the anime counterpart was a non-canon fucking reboot attempt!

>>25856419
I'm not even that other guy! I've been the guy pointing out your buzzwords this whole thread! I actually couldn't care less about your "objective" opinion!

File: 1456267215961.png (675KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

675KB, 640x480px

Like, what´s the point of these threads. Every gen has inexcusable designs. What´s the point of making generalized statements like this? Why can't you actually say why a good design is good and why a bad design is bad instead of forgoing any type of actual intelligent discussion by simply saying an unspecified whole are better than another unspecified whole

>>25856424
>>25856419
>>25856435
>>25856408
>>25856387

more bait!

more exclamation!

it's like you're not even trying to pass as believable bait!

File: 1427040255043.png (80KB, 211x244px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 211x244px

>>25856305
>most of the gen 5 designs were done by a fucking westerner
>7 pokemon is most of gen 5