Thread replies: 7
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
File: large[1].jpg (75KB, 500x500px) Image search:
[Google]
![large[1].jpg](https://cdn.4archive.org/vp/image/1459/908/1459908162504.jpg "large[1]")
75KB, 500x500px
If there was a Magic type, (which there should not be, because it is a dumb idea,) what would its type effectiveness be? What moves/mons would be retyped?
>>
File: 4217-Unown-Q[1].png (27KB, 300x300px) Image search:
[Google]
![4217-Unown-Q[1].png](https://cdn.4archive.org/vp/image/1459/908/1459908559554.png "4217-Unown-Q[1]")
27KB, 300x300px
>>25844164
Unown, pure Magic, Musharna, Psychic/Magic.
Would Normal be super effective against Magic, or would Magic be super effective on Normal?
>>
>>25844217
Super effective against Normal, although it doesn't resist Normal attacks
Fighting would be immune to it
>>
>>25844164
Psychic and Fairy would be merged into Magic type.
>>25844280
Nevermind, there'd probably be a four way effectiveness circle between Magic, Fighting, Dark, and Fairy, based on the four standard roles of battle (Attacker, Tank, Ranger, and Healer).
>>
>>25844217
Also Sigilyph.
Because what is Sigilyph.
>>
>SE vs ????
>NVE vs Psychic, Fighting, Bug
>Weak to Psychic
>Resists Ghost
It would help if you clarified whether we're talking about stage magic or wizard magic.
>>
SE versus Fighting, Fairy, and Ghost
NVE versus Psychic and Steel
Resists Fairy and Dark
Weak to Psychic and Fighting
Thread posts: 7
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2