Now that the dust has settled, can we all agree that Gen IV was shit?

>>25817990
Yes, it is shit OP, but genwar threads are cancer and you are too.

Gen four was literally the least memorable generations for me. The starters were shit. The gyms were shit. But it did have a neat champion.

Only gen I dislike enough to call "shit" is 3.

>>25817990
No it's not

is Platinum so much better than D/P that justifies a purchase?

>>25805798
oh I get it. These are bait threads.

IV is the second best after V, fact. III comes following IV.

It definitely had some glaring flaws. Like mud, snow, and some HMs. Really liked Gen 4 though. And if we are including HG/SS, then gen 4 was great

>>25817990
Gen IV is okay because it is the most average generation: introduced many important items, buffed the underused Dragon-type (though Draco Meteor was a big mistake), Physical-Special split, didn't made or introduced any broken Pokémon (Salamence being the only exception. Garchomp was only broken on Sandstorm and anyways it dies to an Ice Beam if not holding Yache Berry).

>>25817990
OP, Mods might consider this as Spam. I was banned last week for spamming.

File: 11910373_1644725502406779_1795410988_n.jpg (18KB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 320x320px

>>25818007
>the starters were shit
You're not wrong.