Now that the dust has settled, can we all agree that Gen VI was shit?

Better than Gen 5, but it aint saying much

Now that the shit has settled can we all free Gen VI was dust?

Was a step down from Gen 5 by quite a lot, but still good.

No, because it's not over yet

File: 1444333777262.jpg (49KB, 499x360px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 499x360px

All Pokemon gens are shit.

File: Kino.jpg (470KB, 1578x1992px) Image search: [Google]

470KB, 1578x1992px

Daily Reminder

>>25793881
>can we all agree
No because /vp/ isn't a hive mind and we all have differing opinions compared to you OP. I actually liked Gen 6 despite the fact that so many people say it was easy as shit and there wasn't a lot of character development, I didn't find the stories boring, I liked plenty of the Pokemon introduced, and Fairy-type is great, Klefki and Dedenne are two of my favorites.

File: 1457684256511.jpg (35KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 640x640px

>>25793975

>/vp/ isn't a hive mind

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

The dust won't settle until gen 8

>>25793923

In a nutshell, yeah. It boggles my mind how anyone could disagree with this. Taking everything into account: Features, graphics, speed, region sizes, sales and reviews, etc. this should be the objective list.

>>25793975
>liking Dedenne
Opinion discarded.

>>25794006
>speed,

Yeah, because it's so much more important than pokemon design
Taking this criteria in account, Gen V just cant be above decent

>>25793881
jesus where is that?
sandnigger land?

>>25794006

Good thing it is objectively correct.

>>25794023

Fall in a trench and get suffocated, wasteman.

>>25794032
Phoenix. So, North Beanerland.

>>25794006
>objective list
Nice joke.

I really liked Black on my first play through but I didn't get a desire to replay it like I normally do.

For a long time I preferred Gen VI to V, but I picked up a copy of Black 2 last week...and I gotta say, it's fucking great. It feels more like Pokemon than Black did.

>>25794006
best bait of the day

>>25794006
>>25794043
>ob·jec·tive - (of a person or their judgment) not influenced by personal feelings or opinions in considering and representing facts.

I'd go into synonyms, but you fucks wouldn't know them. You only know the word "objectively" because it was on a spelling test, you dumb fucking millenials.

File: 1459396611599.gif (319KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

319KB, 250x250px

>>25793881
Gen VI lover here.

No.

>>25794098

>not influenced by personal feelings or opinions in considering and representing facts.

But that's exactly what we meant, faggot. It is factually correct that Gen 5>4>3>6>2=1

>>25794108

Hello, Kalosperm. New around these parts? PM me xD

>>25794109
>faggot

Yet another go-to term for enraged children.

>>25794117
Call me whatever you want. It still doesn't change the fact that not everyone here hates gen VI.

Also I've been here since 2010.

>>25793923
yeah, except the part where you confused gen 1/2 with gen 3 and gen 3 with gen 6 which is not in the shit tier, that's a pretty accurate list.

>>25794117
fuck off "henry"

>>25793881
But we are only halfway through it. They haven't even released the second half of the dex.

File: 1458153806140.png (292KB, 800x718px) Image search: [Google]

292KB, 800x718px

>>25793889
>da linearity bogeyman

>>25794162
>second half
New Pokemon = New Gen. Any other line of thinking is objectively wrong.

>>25793881
No it was great.

I'm not even going to bother with Gen VI if they keep the same EXP scaling it had. Bring back Gen V's

>>25794190
Same set of compatible mechanics = same gen. Any other line of thinking is wrong.

Gen 6 was great, just in my humble opinion. Loved the Pokemon except the version Fairies, the most beautifully designed region and E4 so far, and I personally enjoyed the music a lot, with all the piano tracks and European sensibilities.

The storyline has never been noteworthy for Pokemon games, other than Gen 5's theme of questioning the very structure of Pokemon society.

>>25794266
So ORAS's Megas that make it incompatible with X and Y make it a new gen? SuMo confirmed gen VII

>>25794109
>factually correct

Oh sweet baby did you fall and hit your head?

>>25794266
Conjecture. You have no way of knowing that the games are going to have backwards compatibility with X and Y.

We do, however, know that there are new Pokemon - well, that and the official commercial outright stating that it's a new gen.

Good to know you're still in the first stage of grief, though.

>>25794378
ORAS has the same mechanics and can battle with XY. So it's gen 6.

shit now has dust, Gen VI fagree was settled

I think we can all agree that there's far too much dust.

>>25793881
>not even popular enough for a third game
yeah I think it's pretty obvious that even John Gamefreak realised it was shit.

>>25794924
SM is the "third game"

>>25794929
Keep telling yourself that.

>>25794939
Ok. I like telling myself true information.

>>25794402
One of us did, and I'm not gonna say who.
But I will point out that only one of us thinks it's ok to disagree with proven facts.

I liked gen 6.
For me it goes 1=2>4=6>3>>>5

Nah it was ok