Why don't we have an owlbear Pokemon yet?

>>25773559
>implying ____birds____

>>25773559
Because D&D is shit.

>>25773559
There's 1000s of scientific species. It's never possible to adhere to all of those, let alone every single folklore beast

>>25773559
>implying owls are bears

>>25773590
And owlbears are not even folklore, they're literally based on a cheap plastic toy Gary Gygax had.

>>25773590
>owlbears
>folklore

kek.

>>25773589
We already have slime and mimic Pokemon though.

File: ass.png (501KB, 762x735px) Image search: [Google]

501KB, 762x735px

>>25773630
>the textures actually look worse
my sides

>>25774040
While they arguably originated in D&D (at least mimmics, anyway), they're popular in other rpgs as well, and are find in most JRPGs. Owlbears are pretty much unknown in Japan.

File: owlbear.png (53KB, 214x182px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 214x182px

>>25774103
Owlbears have appeared in Dragon Quest before.

Dragon Quest is insanely popular in Japan.

>>25774372
True. Do you think GF wants to make a pokémon based on what they would see as just a random DQ monster, though?

>>25774372
Yeah but then they'd just go
>why did they make a pokemon based on that thing from dragon quest
and even if you knew the truth its a retarded idea

>>25773559
Because I didn't know I wanted one until now.
I'll put a word in with my father for Gen. VII.

Gary Gygax was a terrible DM.

>>25774071
>>the textures actually look worse
not it doesn't you dumb fuck.

>>25773596
Some of these designs he makes are good, some are okay but the art is beautiful, and some are just so hideously ugly and trying so hard for "realer than real" it's aggravating.