What kind of person are you? The person that would pick Mega

File: Hokuto no kek.jpg (4KB, 85x125px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 85x125px

Neither. Starmie a shit. Now fuck off with your dumb thread.

It mostly depends on the design but X sounds more appealing

>>25760172
Type of person identified: a shit

>>25760153
Why would you want a bulky starmie ? It makes no sense to turn a fast sweeper into a tanky milotic type

>>25760230
It'd still be fast and have 100 sp.atk. What's wrong with hypothetical options?

>>25760153
I prefer starmie StarmieY. I cringe whenever people run some shitty defensive sets on naturally offensive pokemon, such as Garchomp, Talonflame or ZardX. Like, you have offensive behemoth and you turn him into sissy, what's wrong with you?

>>25761678
>ZardX
Zard X has some decent bulk on it along with Roost and various boosting moves like Belly drum and Dragon Dance you have a great tank right there.

>>25760230
Bully Starmie has been a thing for a while... Reflect Type + Scald + Rapid Spin

>>25761738
I'm interested. Tell me about this set.

>>25761738
Who does starmie bully? Weaker fire types? Where's my doujin of Starmie bullying vulpix?

With its movepool? Starmie X for sure.

>>25761823
Ferrothorn mostly, with HP fire. It's a shit set.

>>25760153
Id use both.

File: 121.gif (194KB, 450x450px) Image search: [Google]

194KB, 450x450px

>>25760153
WHY IS STARMIE SO SEXY POKEMON?!

>>25760153
I always prefer a fast Starmie, so I'd lean towards using Y, but it would also depend on the team support I'd be using.

On the other hard, I think I'd like the X design better; more Sea Star, less Ultraman-star

File: Mega Starmie.png (129KB, 389x396px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 389x396px

>>25762259
because