This shit still doesn't make any sense to me
Golem takes Machoke's reptilian features and toes
Machamp takes Graveler's extra arms and loses some reptilian features and toes
It loses features, and gets another spoon.
nb4 Remoraid/Octillery
>STILL liking golem
>>25690067
It's not about the arms you have on the outside anon, it's about the arms you have on the inside.
>>25690095
That moustache tho
>>25690140
I like Kadabra's better, the way it hangs down and comes to neat points instead of curving up to frayed paint brushes.
>>25690067
It's mega will have it grow them back by breaking them out of it's rock "shell", just watch.
>>25690067
>>25690067
>>25690083
>>25690319
Guys what if
Guys listen here
What if
Guys
What if Golem didn't evolve from Graveler plus a Machoke-face, and Machamp didn't evolve from Machoke plus Graveler-arms
What if
Guys
What if Golem is just Machoke covered in Graveler-rocks, and Machamp is just Graveler without Graveler-rocksYour Golem doesn't miss life as a Graveler because it was never Graveler to begin with, it was a Machoke you traded away for one and the trade machine spit it back out."Do you love me now, Master?"
>>25690067
Erosion and uplift
>>25690554
What if it was originally intended for them to evolve like karrablast and shelmet but they didnt have the programming back then?
>>25690554
What if they fuse in SM?
>>25690067
It is the results of evolutionary metamorphosis.
disadvantages and advantages.
>>25690588
That's what I said in another thread and someone got pissed for ever suggesting it.
>>25690624
made this a while back
>>25690554
makes sense for Machoke and Gravler to be traded, and Haunter and Kadabra to be traded.
He don't has 4 arms and 2 legs in the original game
>ITT: Headcannon general
>>25695002
Graveler is a living, bipedal boulder. It has a rocky crest about its small eyes. It has four arms, each with a three-fingered hand. It was shown in Pokémon Snap that, despite having legs, it can revert to a legless form. This grants it the ability to float.
Do your research, dummy.
>>25690588
That's what I assume honestly. It's like how they don't fix Nidoran (M/F) or likely don't want to move Raichu to Dedenne's evolution, they just don't want to mess with the original 151, which while I respect, is silly considering some of the things they've done over the year, time to move on and change some things and adapt.
>>25695002
Fun fact: Sugimori was asked to draw all the Pokemon based on what the sprites looked like, so while it's likely he didn't originally have four arms, Sugimori saw him as having four arms and here we are.
>>25695163
I love it when idiot anons pull information from their asses
>>25695529
He's not wrong actually. Once the anime came out, Sugimori and the team redrew everything to better reflect the anime because the art was criticized, it's also why the Yellow Sprites look different too, they did both art and sprites for Yellow and made it more akin to the anime style because of how scrutinized they were over it.
Maybe Graveler's extra arms were just holding him back?
>>25695622
Source?
>>25690097
Remoraid/Octillery doesn't make sense though
>>25690067
>>25690083
>>25690554
Except you can evolve graveler and machoke without exclusively trading them.
>>25696816
>evolving from a handgun to a cannon
>b-but it's a fish into an octopus! muh realism!
Chinchou and Lanturn. Chinhou can walk on land and can do loads of things with his long separate anteanna. Then Lanturn comes along..
>>25697023
Not the fish to octopus shit. It's that pistols evolve into assault rifles.
>>25697052
>octillery
>an assault rifle
Choose one. Also, it's the gun/artillery theme that matters, not what kind of gun it is.
Don't see you bitching about a goldfish turning into a Chinese dragon.
>>25690554
Guys what if
>>25690319
It's not bad but honestly I'd love to see it break out it's shell completely and basically end up looking like brown, armored Machamp
>>25694086
It's weird, I give remoraid >octillery shit for being fucking stupid but I've never given this line's reasoning any though. The only thing they have in common is the shell motif but they aren't critical to gorebyss or stoutland's designs at all
>>25699733
What does Stoutland have to do with Clamperl?
>>25695071
fucking hell I hate Blaziken
First time I played Ruby I picked Torchic because it seemed awesome, without knowing its final stage. I had to restart with Treecko. So shit.
>>25699683
I thought the same thing when I was a kid. Were- and War- sound similar and Garurumon gets MetalGarurumon's metal
>>25699753
It evolves from Clamperl you Kalosygote
>>25699773
Is there some sort of joke that im missing? Stoutland evolves from Herdier not Clamperl. Huntail is the other evo of Clamperl.
>>25690067
>
Samurott.
>>25696990
GF did a lot of shit that they probably now regret in Gen 1 (like Nidoran having two seperate dex entries for both sexes). Maybe it's one of those things that RBY couldn't check for and now they don't want to go back and make major changes.
>>25690100
SHUT UP
>>25699683
They look different because they're based on the toys. WarGreymon is designed to be made of Agumon parts, and MetalGarurumon is made of Gabumon parts.
>>25697289
But why does a handgun fish turn into a cannon octopus instead of a cannon fish?
>>25690111
Oh god, this just gave me a mental image of a skinny little shit on the inside with another 2 arms whacking off behind that shell.
>>25702862
Because archerfish and octopi both use jet propulsion.
>>25695163
Fixing Nidoran M/F would be okay for all players. Change evolution method to this >>25690554 would be more controversial, this change will complicate the game and could backlash.
Recon Raichu and Dedenne would be one of the most controversial thing Game Freak has ever done. Probably a great change, but still controversial.
>>25699831
Kalosperm detected
On the other hand, did you see the new jacksepticeye video today?