/simg/ Simulation Games General

File: h i n d.webm (527KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

527KB, 1920x1080px

First for hind

File: 866586.jpg (1MB, 4404x2940px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4404x2940px

2nd for
:)

File: tank hard kill protection.webm (538KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

538KB, 1280x720px

>ATGMs
>anything but obsolete

File: siria t-90 des 2017-1-23.jpg (105KB, 1600x891px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 1600x891px

>>187395864
Syria got the T90 (firts gen), non M, nor AM, wich is a t72B with a t80U gun, and nothing more.

Isn't T-90 just a T-72 with more base armor?

>>187396078
wait wtf heppens here
tanks have shotguns mounted on them hitting incoming explosive plates ?

>>187396572
radar detected incoming projectiles and shoots explosives in their way before they hit

>>187396383
>leopards
When did they ever get rekt? if you mean the two roach leopards, the roaches inside them floored it like pussies and they got captured and blown up from the air. ISIS didn't actually knock them out

>>187396195
>knocked out
Roasting the Doshka's 12.7mm magazine does not equate to "destroying a tank", anon.

>>187394586
Those jammers are designed to work against TOW missiles. Do you even know how TOW guidance works?

>>187396572
Even better. It shoots a rocket that shoots a shotgun.

File: 035c86d76f048d4a585caadbeadf8509.jpg (203KB, 800x462px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 800x462px

>>187396572
Comeback systems that force the explosion of charge warheads.
Some works like a direct fire shotgun, and others make the charge jump in the air and explode facing down, depending on what is responding to.
>>187396247
Pic is a t72B3, made in response to this.
https://youtu.be/YZ7rkOHNaik?t=56s
Look the lack of reactive armor plates.
Its the same thing as chechnya, bad usage-tactics in clusterfuck enviroments, wich made the t80 famous for being shit asides from the turbine engine.
And you see docus about the russian tanks having a hard time at berlin, because at first they have to secure sectors, then had to secure blocks, then have to secure each house because even toddlers had a panzerfaust, its like they never learned.

File: 20170706223227_1.jpg (499KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

499KB, 1920x1080px

>wake up
>new thread is tanks edition
>people talking about tanks
HOW DO I CONTAIN MY AUTISM

File: 1372383480776.jpg (263KB, 1400x900px) Image search: [Google]

263KB, 1400x900px

>>187397387
With fire support of course.

>>187397464
its like someone tried to cram as many shit into this image
>tiny ass captured czech tank form the 30's
>a truck with a gun mounted on it
>a probable relic of ww1/armored train
>gigantic useless gun of ebin photo-ops and many propagandas

File: sempai i'm gonna cum~.webm (780KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

780KB, 1280x720px

>>187397387

>>187397387
You know I always love and indulge you sabowman ;)

File: 11514-animated_gifchat8etf.gif (3MB, 290x189px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 290x189px

>>187397623
>the guy in the background

>>187397327
>>187397272
>>187397204
hmmm
in the webm it looks like it the counter tow came from the right of the tank

where is it mounted on ?

File: 92nd AD.webm (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

>>187397657
I feel loved <3
>/simg/'s cancer therapy using tanks works in 1 day

>>187397984
depends on system
in most systems its mounted on the top of the turret to enable 360 degree usage

>>187398003
One time blessed tank, this time tonk edition, I think we're advancing lad :)

File: shtora_04.jpg (111KB, 800x501px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 800x501px

>>187398135
>>187397984
Some even replace the old granade launchers, and others, like that one who push the charge in the air is more like a box with the charges stacked inside them.
Also look at the ones in the t14 armata on the side of the turret.

File: T-14-Armata-Tank-turret-top-2.jpg (221KB, 1762x900px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 1762x900px

>>187398445
Here are the nii stali launchers and the hard kill ones.
In tests it did good, but im skeptical about being combat proof.
But is the path they taken, so they dont need to worry too much about armor rates and be able to refit them into older tanks.
Some nations are still using the t62A with god knows how many upgrades.

would an a10s 30 mms do anything to a modern tank ?

>>187398927
mess up external objects (like HGM/LMG's mounted on top) and optics at best

>>187398927
I'm no tank expert but I think it should
Isn't a-10 rounds made out of depleted uranium for penetration? Anyway you're attacking from above, so that makes it better I suppose
But my knowledge is 0, so I can be wrong

>>187399116
how about hitting them over over the engine block ?
wouldnt that fuck shit up?
how thick is the top armor?

File: CpAzIBfUkAEa26c.jpg:large.jpg (131KB, 1024x660px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 1024x660px

>>187399130
it could shoot back if its one of this, but vertical attacks never was a strong point in tanks.
Will be a secure knock off, visors and the engine would be BRRRRTTT'ed to the shit.

>>187399287
>engine block
most modern tank engines are completely enclosed
>how weak is top armor
weakest on tanks generally, but not to the point it could be shredded by something like that. I'm not 100% positive about this thought because all modern tanks' armor is classified.

>>187398927
It can do m-kill
Not sure about F and K kills

File: 1495323896274.jpg (39KB, 510x346px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 510x346px

>>187399692
ah ok
thanks

File: 20170821200215_1.jpg (138KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 1920x1080px

>>187395729
tonks are fun!

Fun!

no one plays steel beasts ?
i dont but i'd like to know more of it
you can play as modern tonks right?

File: file.png (48KB, 1056x254px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 1056x254px

>>187400096
not him but

File: merkavaChobham.png (563KB, 1000x467px) Image search: [Google]

563KB, 1000x467px

>>187399508
Its just a sandwich of spaced layers that low the temps if HEAT, absorb the explosion if HE and deviate the rod if Sabot, thats where the "controlled deformation reactive armor" term comes in.

>>187400394
I already know that, tha's pretty basic and common/public info on tank armor. All we know is partial info on composition. Nothing on thickness

>>187400394
>filename
>merkavachobham
que?

File: Chobham.10.gif (43KB, 600x371px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 600x371px

>>187400839
Dunno.

>>187400394
merkava doesnt use Chobham formula you dumb kike

>>187400839
>>187401241
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chobham_armou

>>187402486
What are you trying to prove you dumb cunt

The Merkava doesn't use chobham

>>187403512
If it did it would be a disaster
>more than 200 merkavas penetrated by various Hezbollah ATGMs and RPGs in 2006

File: Advancing.webm (3MB, 1250x980px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1250x980px

Should we rename to tankgen? :3

https://m.imgur.com/gallery/fd4sK

>flight simming is ded
ground forces is a go, arma is now allowed

File: Dezful.png (35KB, 340x868px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 340x868px

>cold war era western tanks were bette-

>>187408380
Nope

File: arma_3tw.webm (1MB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 800x450px

>>187408380
Yay!

>>187408380
>tank sims
>only one real option
>no multiplayer

tonks are just as fucked as playnes
Such is the life of the sim genre

>>187408946
>only one real option
I mean we could Steel Beasts for a month just for shit and giggles

File: de1de4d16e[1].jpg (199KB, 758x527px) Image search: [Google]

199KB, 758x527px

hex tanks

>>187408572
-re.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Bridges

File: ceff446603[1].jpg (141KB, 623x431px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 623x431px

>>187410320
ded tanks

>>187408572
by 1985 they were vastly superior, but as usual the outside conditions determine everything (range, terrain, skill of crew, element of surprise, flanks, supports, etc.)

>>187410429
>Iraqi tanks literally unarmed of their Anti-tank ammunition
>Chieftain meme brigade only manages to disable two of them
Pathetic desu, here's an anecdote from Maj. Gen Ra'ad, the Iraqi who led and planned the invasion
>early in the invasion outside of Jahra, our lead IRG Brigade tanks encountered a Chieftain MBT in a trench defending a government administration building. A T-72 destroyed it and made it's turret fly off with an HE anti-personnel shell fired to the side of its turret
>yfw a T-72 catastrophically killed a Chieftain with HE round

I have more stories of Iraqis shittalking western tanks from their war with Iran, too. They got massive sale offers on Chieftains at a discount, but refused them because of how garbage they were.

If you're gonna shill for western tanks I wouldn't make the Chieftain your rallying point.
>>187410527
I could post statistical and anecdotal evidence for days

>Makki: He was a good division commander, but he had no intelligence background. He could not do the job of the director of intelligence. He refused to pass along the information in order to please the new chief of staff.
Let‘s get back to the battle at Susangard. Some of the Iranians deserted their tanks while their engines were still running. We put the tanks we captured in an exhibition area in Baghdad. Our armor sabot round pierced a Chieftain on one side and the round went through the front armor and came out the backside.
At this time the British approached us to sell us tanks. Salah Askar, director of armor, told me that when the British called and offered to sell him Chieftains he had remarked, ‗We don‘t want your stupid tanks!‘
(Interview with chief of staff of Iraqi 3rd corps)

>Hamdani (IRG maj gen): British weapons were not very good. The 90th Iranian Armored Division had Chieftain tanks; they had a lot of problems and did not fight effectively. The 16th Iranian Armored Division, which was equipped with Chieftain tanks, lost a battle against the 10th Iraqi Armored Brigade with T-62 tanks. It is hard for an armored brigade to destroy a division in 12 hours but it happened; it was a disaster for the Iranians. Kuwait was another disaster. It is hard to compare the Kuwaitis with us, but the result was that the British weapons quickly lost the war. There was a problem with British manufacturing. An order was issued that every tank had to carry two types of ammunition: the first was effective against heavy armor and the second was used against infantry and light armor. We were ordered not to inflict heavy casualties when we entered Kuwait, so we armed our tanks with the less effective ammunition, so the Kuwaiti tanks would be knocked out when we fired on their tanks, but their soldiers would survive. When we fired upon them using this less effective ammunition, I realized that even this ammunition destroyed the Kuwaiti Chieftains.

File: British Mark V (male) tank-1.jpg (179KB, 800x272px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 800x272px

boy tank

File: mkIV-female-tank-side-view.jpg (55KB, 652x310px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 652x310px

>>187412292
Are there any female(male) tanks?

>>187408668
>made up tanks
>made up rifle
not sim

File: 3rd Corps at the border.jpg (710KB, 2672x888px) Image search: [Google]

710KB, 2672x888px

>>187410429
I always dreamed of this becoming a new playable scenario on SABOW with the T-72

File: 4e8727911e[1].jpg (54KB, 200x527px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 200x527px

>>187411647
Yes, direct hits with (125mm) HE rounds are still very dangerous to tanks if you hit them in the right places. The Abrams for example has a glaring weak spot on the upper glacis plate, which is effective against KE due to it's extreme slope but is so thin that you can pop the driver like a balloon if you slap it with HE. Nevermind the other things you can accomplish with HE, like disabling the main gun, or the optics, or radios, or tracks, etc...

The problem with HE is a) it's harder to hit shit with, a huge problem for inaccurate Soviet guns, and b) the off-chance that you hit actual enemy armor like the front of the turret just gives your enemy a free shot at you.

As for 70's tanks in general, the general consensus (learned mostly from Yom Kippurt) was that tank armor wasn't worth diddly since nothing good against then-modern HEAT warheads existed and whoever shot the other guy first was generally guaranteed to win anyway. Thus, western designers started building around the idea that it's better to have equipment that lets you see and shoot the enemy first/faster than to have a thicc wall of armor.

Thermals/TOGs (Which appeared by 85) make such a huge difference in combat that it's not even funny. A platoon of Western tanks can erase a Company of their soviet counterparts before the enemy even knows they're there. See literally any scenario in Steel Beasts, or real world examples like 73 Easting.

>>187413068
Wait, you think thermal equipment was purely restricted to the west?

File: 1456963825644.jpg (422KB, 1280x882px) Image search: [Google]

422KB, 1280x882px

>>187413350
On tanks and IFVs? No I do not think, rather, I know.

Thermal equipment for the Warsaw Pact was restricted on the ground to advanced recon vehicles like the BRM (Which already had GSR on them however so they were more or less redundant). As for line units like the BMPs, T-64, T-72, T-80... they were entirely absent until the Berlin Wall had already fallen.

Of course, you could bring up the active IR searchlights that were only effective out to 800m or so and made said tank a big bright target in the night, but they really don't compare to passive FLIR.

>>187413771
>I know
Dropped. Even Iraqi Assad-Babils in the gulf war had thermal imagine (but outdated). You're pretty delusional if you think the USSR didn't already have these
>IR
Works only at night, we're not talking about night vision, is your knowledge on tanks, dare I say, limited?

>>187414000
>Iraqi Assad-Babils in the gulf war had thermal imagine (but outdated)

You're either looking at a retarded source or you have no idea what a thermal imager is.

>>187414131
I've looked at it years ago and even researched the background of it (looking at all belgian exports to Iraq in the mid-80's to confirm it), Iraq bought thermal sights for their domestic T-72. There's no sure evidence they were mounted on them or used in large numbers, but they had them

>>187414604
What about that time when M1a1s and bradleys fucked up all those Iraqi tanks during a sandstorm?

Might have been T-55s or whatever.

>>187414930
they were all abandoned. The few that fought were virtually blind and leaderless and had no idea if there was going to be a fight
Also sandstorms affected thermals too. But any vehicle equipped with thermal optics can still detect things at 200-100 meters, while anyone using normal optics sees the sand scraping on his sights.

File: 5a74b04821[1].jpg (197KB, 761x762px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 761x762px

>>187414604
>Bought from the west
Do-ho-ho.
But please, post your source.

>There's no sure evidence they were mounted on them or used in large numbers
That's quite the fucking leap from saying that the Warsaw Pact had thermal optics on their tanks, let alone standardization.

Pic related, it's the most advanced sight that the T-72(B, which was exclusive to the Soviets during the Cold War) was equipped with. Thermals were not introduced until the development of SOSNA-U well after the collapse of the Soviet Union, which the Russians had to buy parts from the fucking French (Specifically, Catherine-FC) to have a thermal imaging capability.

>>187415195
Oh, idk they were mostly abandoned.
It makes sense (since we are talking about the middle- east here) I thought it was just night vision they had, but it makes sense that it was thermals during a sandstorm

>>187415207
>only mounted in 1989
>4 year gap between Russians and the west
I don't see anything out of ordinary, I didn't say the Soviets had them standardized on their tanks only that they had access to it + would've been there the same time the west started adopting it if they weren't going through an economical depression and political collapse. I said the Iraqis 100% had thermal optics purchased from belgium between 1982-1988 and it's not known if they were fitted.

>>187415850
Bare-bones prototype imaging systems are a far cry from having them installed on every new tank, which NATO did. The point is that by 1985, the typical Western tank (Be that the M60A3, Chieftain Mk. 11, Abrams, Leo 2) was vastly superior to their Soviet counterparts in this department, overall making the tank itself superior. We haven't even brought up FCS, which the West again had a huge edge in.

>would've been there the same time the west started adopting it if they weren't going through an economical depression and political collapse
If you need to change major historical details in order for it to work, there's no real point even bringing it up. We are looking at the real history of what happened and what was, and the real history is that the typical Western tank was superior to it's Eastern counterpart.

>the Iraqis 100% had thermal optics purchased from belgium between 1982-1988
Okay, what's your source?
>and it's not known if they were fitted
Then don't treat it like it was.

>>187409128
>not already having a permanent license
It's like you don't want to play the best slavshit armor simulator there is

>BMP-2 atgm
>you have to shut down electricity from the turret and use manual cranks to aim the missile in flight

>T-72B1
>right eye gets periscope view, left eye gets FCS readout for lead against a black background so the images combine
>backup sight is just a window with no sights whatsoever
>autoloader sounds like a dying horse

Video related: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-p4b1twfZ6I
Happenings happen around 1:15

Truly soviet armor is the best

>>187417153
The AI still cheats and NATO armor is over represented which are both turn-offs for me. With IFVs in particular your only competition is M2A2 and Marder 1A3, both immune to even 3UBR8 that could frontally kill M2A1 and Marder 1A2 from 1.5 klicks out.

File: ets2_00029.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

Merge of ETS and Farming Simulator when ?

>>187417507
That depends on what you want to do with it. Rolling over everything in a M1A2 is pretty boring, but using shit armor like t72 or even t62 is pretty funny. And you can do equal matchups with best soviet tanks versus second-grade western stuff like M1s or even older tanks.

Also BMP-2 isn't even that shit, the gun is fairly good and the atgm can do a lot of damage to modern armor, at least from the sides. If anything, the Marder is shit compared to it, since its gun can't penetrate anything.

>>187418018
>If anything, the Marder is shit compared to it, since its gun can't penetrate anything.
The Marder easily frontally penetrates the BMP-2 from any range in SB.

>>187417791
>HE against abrams
You can just give up at this point, anon. There's nothing you can do.

File: ambush.webm (1MB, 1280x640px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x640px

surprise bemp

>>187418217
HE hits against the front upper glacis will actually kill an abrams (and I've reproduced this result from 2km many times), that turret gap is like a big shot trap for HE

>>187418195
That's not my experience with marders at all. You can do some damage from the front, but usually not disable it. I usually have to immobilize the bemps and circle around to the side to kill them, and even then it takes dozens of rounds.

File: sit down kid.webm (606KB, 1280x640px) Image search: [Google]

606KB, 1280x640px

>>187418384
bemp kills an abrams at a range where I can't even make out the silhouette and went entirely by muzzle flash

that gap weak spot is real

File: get fucked.webm (888KB, 1280x640px) Image search: [Google]

888KB, 1280x640px

guy in window <-- me trying to use RPGs in squad/arma

bmp <-- bmp

>>187418384
>>187418623
>>187418831
What gayem is this?

File: shi't kal2.webm (430KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

430KB, 1280x720px

>>187419168
Steel Beasts Pro PE. It's hella expensive but pretty gud.

Webm related is me doing some target practice on the sho't kal. I don't understand those targeting runes at all.

>>187418627
One of them is a fully model and accurate real world simulator useful in real world training scenarios. The other is a micro-machines level sim with worse physics than Need for Speed.

>>187420068
>too autistic to get the joke
i'm sorry for you anon

not sure if simg relevant but anybody play Battleground Europe?

>>187421165
>playing shitty p2w

>>187417036
I don't know if I wanna start up or not, but your >fcs statement is completely fucking un-true (until 1989 atleast, when the Soviets couldn't compete anymore due to fund shorages)
>what's your source on Iraq having belgian thermal optics
US leadership. Followed by my own corroboration by going through all Belgian exports to Iraq. Feel free to fucking look it up on some easy-access open source like Wikipedia because it's there.

File: DSC00002.jpg (155KB, 1000x713px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 1000x713px

well babies first flight was a lot spoopier than i had imagined (a bit windy)

flew a C172 with glass cockpit today

gotta say this IRL texture pack is preddygud

im fuckin hooked

File: DSC_0137.jpg (208KB, 2048x1356px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 2048x1356px

>>187422850
Had my first flight in years yesterday, now I'm looking for scholarships to fund a PPL

File: 314160_20170812234911_1.jpg (622KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

622KB, 1920x1080px

>>187422850
>>187422967
Nice! I've only been flying 3 times in my life. Twice in a 172 and once in a 185 out of a private grass field. I'd always imagined I would get a pilots license when I grew up but I just can't manage the cost.

File: MiG-31_in_flight.jpg (3MB, 3000x1497px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3000x1497px

Hello.

This is the MiG-31 Foxhound. It's maximum speed is mach 2.83, with a cruise speed of mach 2.3. It can reach mach 1.21 at low altitudes.

It uses the worlds first aircraft mounted PESA radar, the Zaslon fire control system and can engage up to 4 targets simultaneously using R-33/37 long range air to air missiles.

A flight of 4 MiG-31's can cover and airspace 900km wide. The WSO can provide GCI support to other aircraft, such as the Su-27.

Neat features include:
>retracable IRST that is mounted below the nose
>a GSh-6-23 gun that is mounted on the right side of the fuselage under the wing
>a wooden control stick that you can pull out of the ground in the WSO spot
>a periscope

File: DSC00008.jpg (220KB, 1000x574px) Image search: [Google]

220KB, 1000x574px

>>187422967
wait... thats a thing?
how does one obtain something like that.


another image from the flight, my dad was running my sony so we could snag some cool photos

File: F-5EM-Python-4725.jpg (53KB, 725x397px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 725x397px

dear /tanksim/
I was playing DCS and I wanted to know if it was possible to mod a weapon into the game for a single aircraft.

I love the F-5E, but it seems silly that it doesn't have the Python.
The Python was Israel's answer to the R-73. The Python-3 was the export version that was mounted on almost every countries Tiger ii fleet who was still flying them. It's biggest advantage is that it can be slaved to a radar for BVR firing before its IR seeker takes over.
Do you think adding this would be difficult? How is weapon scripting in this game?

>>187419367
Alright I'll have a look
>$125
>fug no

Looks good though.

>>187423896
It's a bit cheaper if you can get a group and buy a bunch of secondary licenses with one usb dongle. It's still a pretty retarded licensing system though, and overpriced as well.

>>187423737
In the UK atleast there's a few organisations and airlines that do it

>>187424225
Yeah idk though.
Not really into tanks (yet) so I can't justify it.
I've barely touched command; air and naval ops and that was fucking expensive too.

>>187423689
nice, combat record ?

>>187419367
cant a cool kid like me, uuuuhm steal it ?

>>187425680
I don't think there's a pirate version since it uses some sort of physical encryption and is quite the niche game. At least there wasn't around the time I bought it.

File: 1500579511594.jpg (85KB, 804x802px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 804x802px

>>187425793

>>187425680
Do you have way to cheat DRM concived in the late 1990s/ 2000s?

>No
Well you can't have it then.

>>187425497
n-none

File: F14RIOView.jpg (57KB, 1500x656px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 1500x656px

WIP Tomcat RIO cockpit from HB

File: 109508.jpg (174KB, 1200x795px) Image search: [Google]

174KB, 1200x795px

>>187425497
The MiG-31 is a home defense fighter, and therefore has never been employed offensively or defensively, considering the USSR or Russia has never been attacked.

It's also never been exported, so it most likely will never see combat. Russian equipment that never gets exported is usually because they don't even want the slight chance of it ever falling in enemy hands, like all the rest of their shit has.

T-64 is one that comes to mind. MiG-25 was not going to be exported but after the defection they said fuck it and sold them, and immediately began work on the 31.

>>187418627
o kurwa
saved for later

File: 20170716185148_1.jpg (271KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

271KB, 1920x1080px

thank you so much for giving me this thread anons! <3

>>187430402
why hasn't SABOW got a modelled Chieftain interior yet

File: 20170612232014_1.jpg (637KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

637KB, 1920x1080px

>>187432121
Devs too occupied with doing sequels of battles that took place in little villages around their hometown in WW2

>>187417153
It's hilarious, you don't need anything other than 50. for those shit cans, especially with SLAP.

>>187417153
nice """"""sim""""""
Literally no better than arma

>>187436669
Using the commanders .50 there is a shitty idea and will just get the commander killed though. Why wouldn't you use the cannon in a situation like that?

>>187395834
Do you think that fan would slice your fingers off if you touched it

Also do you think they leave those out on the ones they sell to north korea

>>187437498
In that situation? No. Then again, I wouldn't drive right onto the road and into the BMPs face.

>>187397857
My cousin died when the M1 he was commanding hit some concrete debris while going down a hill, he was sitting up outside the turret and got crushed to death when the tank flipped

>>187437801
It's not an engine fan.

>>187412601
I know you're memeing, but mods are main deal in arma. It's easier for dev team to do less content and focus on platform updates.

>make tonk edition
>tonkers appear out of nowhere
It's like they've been hiding

>>187417935
Merge of ets2+farming sim+steel beasts/sabow+arma+dcs+bms when

>>187418831
>guy in window <-- me trying to use RPGs in squad/arma
kek
Same with me lad

File: 20170818132645_1.jpg (421KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

421KB, 1920x1080px

>>187439329
in the bushes where you flyboys can't spot us

>>187437994
Well yeah but shooting bemps from 2km isn't very much fun. At least the window shooting gives some element of challenge.

File: 1403294577128.jpg (59KB, 672x357px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 672x357px

>>187439329
Im a house, who are this tonkers you talk about?

File: CAS.webm (2MB, 764x468px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 764x468px

>>187440323
LEAVE THAT POOR HIND ALONE YOU ANIMAL
>>187439329
There's dozens of us!

>>187439953
>>187440234
Is there supposed to be a tank in the pic?

File: 20170314193244_1.jpg (737KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

737KB, 1920x1080px

>>187440323
>tfw hit one of those in the past with a SABOT round in the middle of the night
>it still kept flying
Maybe I'm a hind abuser myself
Post good shots tonkers
>hit a tiny ass mortar in the middle of the night with a low-velocity HE shell from 888 meters in the middle of a tropical african jungle

File: file.png (331KB, 600x235px) Image search: [Google]

331KB, 600x235px

>>187440323
I curse you not to get any good hits anymore for this.

>>187440494
What game is that? Looks cool.

File: 20170215160216_1.jpg (449KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

449KB, 1920x1080px

>>187441930
>lad
lad

>>187439329
Need more tank sim games desu. Not enough of them at all.

File: underway.webm (2MB, 1250x980px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1250x980px

>>187395834
I just noticed this webm and something about it is pretty cute
>adjusts fan to cool himself properly
>checks around for his papers to see tasks

>>187442210
Holy shit

File: leo.webm (2MB, 720x404px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 720x404px

>>187442837
>checks around for his papers
Everything about hind is cute!

>>187443029
kewl webm desu

>>187442837
>>187442594
>>187442210
How autistic is that game when it comes to modeling fcs and other controls? At least it looks way prettier than SB.

>>187444016
Never mind it doesn't have multiplayer. Into the trash it goes.

File: 1465333350517.png (787KB, 654x539px) Image search: [Google]

787KB, 654x539px

>>187444182

File: Tiger vs M3.webm (3MB, 1514x764px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1514x764px

Whos /combatmission/ here

File: Cuito-Cuanavale.webm (3MB, 1250x702px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1250x702px

Last few webums for today lads
I think we are in the dawn of a new, beautiful era

>>187444497
Too expensive for a poorfag.

>>187444497
I played some CMSF but the PBEM multiplayer got a bit tedious. Maybe I should give black sea a go, since it can do TCP/IP turn based games.

>>187444497
>bought the Combat Mission Normandy+Commonwealth bundle before 2.0 hit
>have to buy engine updates for a chance to play with others
This fucking company

>>187428971
As a professional radar operator, I'm unironically looking forward to playing the F-14 from the RIO cockpit alone

File: 136722.jpg (429KB, 1280x843px) Image search: [Google]

429KB, 1280x843px

>puts actually good avionics in a mig for once
>makes a good plane

wow crazy how that work

File: 1502561335964.png (132KB, 350x340px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 350x340px

>>187444884
is this real

File: that look of disgust.png (69KB, 590x652px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 590x652px

>>187446967
>sees peaceful tankers and /simg/ not being a complete shithole for once
>"time to start a threadwar"
kys unironically.
xth for gas all planefags

>>187447481
Pretty sure it's viral marketing for the company in the url.

Do you ever guys thought about what would happen if we would have mind we have, but we would be tanks?

>>187447691
Is this bait?
How is my post causing a thread war when I attack literally nobody?

>>187429292
Really makes me wonder some of these jets that saw none or limited service but then became obsolete

>>187450695
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?

>>187451947
I've been further even more decided to use even go need to do look more as anyone can.

File: 1490569755979.jpg (2MB, 2837x1913px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2837x1913px

BMS F-18 OPS GET IN NIGGERS

File: 8239d92d-0659-4dd5-8651-5495a461ef40..jpg (849KB, 1524x1056px) Image search: [Google]

849KB, 1524x1056px

thanks for reminding me of /simg/

>>187454064
Her writing is so gay
No wonder she likes furries

>>187454389
>her

>>187451917
>MiG-31
>obsolete

Nah. The radar and missile combination will always be a threat. Even if the pk % is low as fuck(i say that because slavshit is still slavshit) just the fact that it can get missiles in the air at targets from that far makes it dangerous. US and NATO doctrine accept no losses, so getting shot at is a huge fucking deal.

Against F-35's and F-22's? Yeah it has no chance, but neither does anything else really.

MiG-31 is still a genuinely dangerous platform.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1JABdS-HN5A

>>187454674
Well was more referring to into the future or some of the cold war stuff

>>187455302
I see. Chances are the MiG-31 will never fire a missile at another aircraft in anger, and will be retired. I guess its better than getting bodied.

Although the rumors are swirling again about a replacement for the MiG-31 that is going to be mach 4 capable, which I am fucking doubting hard, but would be interesting to see.

Russians might just say fuck it, we can't do stealth or avionics, but we can do fast.

File: file.png (700KB, 900x637px) Image search: [Google]

700KB, 900x637px

Mig-41 when

File: l-D1-u.gif (518KB, 320x274px) Image search: [Google]

518KB, 320x274px

>>187457887
when you can complete a carrier landing in topgun for nes.

>>187454674
>Against F-35's and F-22's? Yeah it has no chance, but neither does anything else really.
The new meme in missiles is datalink BVR IR. So that might change eventually.
At the same time, that also robs the MIg-31 of its biggest advantage.

In the versions of the Mi-24 where the cannon is fixed like in the black shark, what does the guy up front actually do

>>187460572
Shoots the ATGM's I'd assume.

>>187460572
Give emotional support

>>187459490
I could land on the carrier way back when but only with my.... Namco, I think... joystick. The input was still digital of course but something about grasping the stick made me better and I was able to nail landings.

Air to air refuelling in mission 3 was a cast-iron bitch though - I rarely got that done properly.

>>187465816
>dat 1 wire

File: kekpepe.jpg (12KB, 258x245px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 258x245px

>BMS

File: Final Boss.webm (3MB, 870x490px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 870x490px

>>187465237

File: GENERATE LIFT.jpg (498KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

498KB, 1920x1080px

DO YOU EVEN GENERATE LIFT?

>>187467330
holy fuck is that the Russian Corvette class with SA-10 naval equipment?. a whole flight of us tried to blow that fucker up.
HARDCORE MODE.

File: 1501303139266.jpg (246KB, 400x800px) Image search: [Google]

246KB, 400x800px

>>187467327

>>187467330
Is it possible to fire counter missiles with maddog AMRAAMS?

>>187470430
I dunno it was possible to target missiles from carriers in FC2.
might be able to hit some of them. Radar/heat signature shows up sometimes.

>>187454389
>Her
>Implying I'd ever date a girl lmao

>>187475914
Had that happen to me once except it was only a .308 sized hole, it was in the edge not the middle, and it was probably accidental

File: CM Black Sea 2015-09-05 18-55-13-702.jpg (703KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

703KB, 1920x1080px

>tank edition
yes

File: meme.webm (3MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1280x720px

thanks are gay lol

>>187478735
That's some strange river.

File: CM Black Sea 2015-09-04 15-21-36-978.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

blyat!

>>187438931
>make trash game
>its a-ok
>we got dem modsss

thanks god it's not allowed in this g

Can we discuss pirating DCS modules ITT?

Such as risks, what can be priated, and how to do it?

>>187440323
its 1 tracer every 100 rounds right ?
otherwise that rate of fire seems low af my nig

>>187443545
wut gay-m
can you pilot ancient tonk?

File: sneaky raghead.webm (2MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 640x360px

>>187444884
gotta use anti-uav camo my dude

File: 1490207255965.jpg (36KB, 602x475px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 602x475px

>>187454983
>press the bomb
ded

>>187460572
rubs the stick to help the pilot relieve pressure
0w0

>>187470624
i remember recently in dcs to have locked up a sam in my su27

im sure it was a ground based sam i could trace back the smoke trail, dunno how big it was

didnt try to fire a missile at it but i guess it should work

>>187482046
I don't think anyone bothers to crack dcs

>>187460572
It helps pilot morale, if pilot dies, he knows that he's not alone

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=75YeKx4NwNU

did the ruskie lease one of these form the us ?
would it be feasible to see it in BoX ?

wont even bother asking about dcs in its current state

i really like p47s
:)

>>187483337
Isn't P-47 just rip-off of spitfire?

>>187483431
yes
pregnat beergut spitfire
:)

>>187483474
Thought so. Hoggit said something correct atleast for once

>>187483431
>tfw p47 is supposed to be a long range "interceptor"

2000 feet/min should do it

File: 1483179286323.jpg (26KB, 604x367px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 604x367px

>>187483431
>>187483474
>>187483607

File: P47brazil.jpg (279KB, 1017x793px) Image search: [Google]

279KB, 1017x793px

>Brazilian P-47 after impact with chimney; the pilot managed to land safely

>>187396078
>A single ATGM

>>187483607
Don't know why you niggers shit on hoggit so much.

You're one in the same.

You're both containment boards.

>>187485414
downvoted, meanie comment
:)

>>187485414
Rule one is in force. Warning Rule one is in force Warning Rule one is in force Warning Rule one is in force Warning Rule one is in force Warning Rule one is in force
Those girls get triigered so fucking easy.
God forbid you critiqe a module they all like.

>>187485414
>being a dick
banned

>>187485414

dumb redditor

>>187484448
Why did you mention me with weird vietnam/face picture?

File: DCS.webm (3MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1280x720px

even better missile than archer

>>187487935
>he's flaring

>>187488032
>RB75 seeker has 360 degrees visibility

>>187488158
What is this RB- 75?
it looks like a maverick and whe I serach for it, I see mavericks as results.

>>187488032
>AGM-64
>Flares

>>187488389
Viggen maverick

>>187488456
Oh, that's the one that can do thing shown in the vid.

Fuck, that needs to get nerfed in game and irl

To the Falcon pilots, what's the best way to learn the F-16? My control are all set up and I can take off and land but I'm unsure how to go about training.

>>187488878
Really the best way is the dive into the Dyn Camp, and use the in doc checklists.

>>187488878
Perform one "type" of mission and learn it. Get on Falcon Online for the big boiz

>>187489717
>>187490223
thanks, one of the biggest problems I'm having is finding the right target.

I'm used to flying the Ka-50 where I can just use the HMD to point my Shkval at the right area on the ABRIS and look around. Where as it seems really clunky and slow with the TGP and the FCR seems to be useless for picking out targets.

Before I know it, I'm over flying the obj and getting shot at by SAMs.
I suppose I should pre-flight plan more.

>>187490381
Use steerpoints to designate the targets.
Works like a charm with ccrp and gbu12.

>>187490381
You can set up so that the FCR looks for ground moving targets as well

File: 1465815440973.jpg (245KB, 570x845px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 570x845px

>>187490223
>Falcon Online

>>187493463
you just bitter they stopped what has to be the comfiest pvp ops

>>187488451
>that's the joke
>autism overload

>>187488032
>>187488451
Can you explain?

>>187491830
i wonder how realistic this is

i mean the recon function in bms campaign is way op

>you literally see every single infantryman or equipment on the ground

>pin every target to steerpoint

>load jdams

>pickle and go back home

i mean i guess in real life you'd get aerial recon and coordinates but in bms it's a little too easy imo

>>187495859
said recon function is kinda fucked on my pc. i click recon and the game hangs there for a couple of minutes before it actually shows ground images
anyone else ?

File: 390.jpg (32KB, 350x312px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 350x312px

>>187495781
mavs dont give no shit bout flares

nigga you gotta chaff

wtf i thought ppl in this general knew a thang or 2 bout planes n shit

shieeet gotta be teaching this white ass n shit

>>187495859
What is JSTAR, Rivet Joint and every fucking satellite in orbit

>>187496082
>what are clouds
>satellite image = 4x zoomed image at ground level

talking about bms

how similar are the f18 and f16 radar and systems irl ?

(i know in the game they copy pasted )

>>187497497
Nice to see the Belgian Air Component put some -16s over Spa yesterday, not the usual trainers.

>>187496065
What does this nigra mean?

>>187498436
the missile knows where it is by knowing where it isnt

>adding in the names of games not relevant to the general
/egg/ got punished for this, you guys should too

File: 20170715161025_1.jpg (382KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

382KB, 1920x1080px

not your safe space planeboos

>>187499160
Squad shouldn't be there

>>187499160
how about you go away and let us do us

>>187499160
>t. buttmad armafag
HA HA


HAAAAA

File: f16 refuel door.gif (994KB, 1066x1600px) Image search: [Google]

994KB, 1066x1600px

female

File: F-35C-refuel.jpg (182KB, 1024x805px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 1024x805px

male

>>187499724
female(male)*
real females aren't allowed into war

>>187499920
no

traps got banned

thats why i posted the 2 genders

>>187499724
Reported

>>187500593
she's 12
its legal in my country

>>187499724
what a sloppy cunt.

>>187500813
yea she literally has skid marks in in her pelvic area

>>187499724
Is that cum around the pussy(boipussy)?
The fucking whore

>>187501402
No, those are skidmarks where they tried ramming their nozzles in

>>187501514
she never has enough
she keeps coming back for more

File: lewd 5.png (122KB, 339x314px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 339x314px

>>187499724
>Kilo11 I need you to fill me up

File: 58956866_p0.png (1006KB, 1163x1668px) Image search: [Google]

1006KB, 1163x1668px

>>187503040
lewd5outof?

>>187503040
whats lewd 9?

File: lewd 9.png (209KB, 432x364px) Image search: [Google]

209KB, 432x364px

>>187503606

we need grandpa back to ban these paedo posters

>>187504474
Not your safe space

File: fuck off weeb.jpg (74KB, 790x620px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 790x620px

>>187504936
no
but this is yours
with an electrified fence to keep you degenerates in

File: 20170718195941_1.jpg (522KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

522KB, 1920x1080px

F

File: tumblr_nvzpihs2Bo1u56oe8o1_500.jpg (40KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 500x281px

>>187505072
>sweet sound of normie squealing

>>187499829
daddy plz

>>187508005
>>187508005
Why is he doing this to her?

>>187506686
>filename
>pedo image

File: 13970357175_0f5b3c8439_o.jpg (2MB, 4361x3151px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4361x3151px

which never-ever brings you the most pain?

File: mikoyan-gurevich_mig-25rb_russia_-_air_force_an2195954.jpg (247KB, 1200x656px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 1200x656px

>>187512234
Honestly and not memeing

Any good sim games on the cheap?

>>187483337
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vv1pRSuC7Ys

File: MiG-25-jet-753x423.jpg (47KB, 753x423px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 753x423px

>>187512234

File: file.jpg (101KB, 828x388px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 828x388px

>>187512234
This will never be in SABOW

File: tornado.jpg (476KB, 1200x819px) Image search: [Google]

476KB, 1200x819px

>>187512234

>>187516524
>video posted in 08BC

>>187512234
Any later Mig. Any british aircraft.

I'm just glad VEAO fucked off. Better nothing than having their shite

>>187521435
Don't be so sure, they seemed interested in porting their stuff into DCS in the future.
Maybe if they did this, we might see the typhoon and F1 with some quality behind it.

I really fucking hope so at least.

I think cold war tanks were even in the nature that the attacking side, no matter which, would usually get vaporized (See: Arab Israeli wars & Iran-Iraq war)

File: DF-ST-83-10620.jpg (1006KB, 2830x1680px) Image search: [Google]

1006KB, 2830x1680px

>>187526725
F-111 module WHEN

File: 1363983368744,0.jpg (19KB, 648x365px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 648x365px

>>187522589
>VEAO
>Some quality
Lad

File: 3_22.jpg (107KB, 950x685px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 950x685px

>>187528316

NEVER

Is there any possibility of a EW module or is that shit way too top secret

File: Rui Moreira Lima.jpg (198KB, 682x960px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 682x960px

>>187484463
B R A Z I L
R
A
Z
I
L

File: cat.png (149KB, 411x412px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 411x412px

>>187454064
Thank God for Hurricane Harvey

>>187521047
>still better than anything in DCS or IL2

File: 1503696266394.png (141KB, 538x800px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 538x800px

>>187539792

>>187496912
Curious about this too, answer plz

>>187499160
name which

>>187528771
Reeeee

I want this shit so bad

File: 4amW6dK.jpg (245KB, 2048x1365px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 2048x1365px

ded

>>187546336
ded like me when I stop dreaming about flying mig-31/25 in dcs

File: litafbig.png (2MB, 2374x1584px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2374x1584px

>>187546497
I am quite internment with this feeling.
At least the F-14 will sorta be like a US Navy MiG-31.

>>187549182
Yeah, but the Tomcat isn't a brick that brute forces itself 3 times the speed of sound.

However, it's the next best thing to it.