/scg/edg/scedge/ Scam Shitizen Erectile Dysfunction General #189

Neat, I hadn't seen that Cherie boobs yet.

File: Carrack-4k-2.jpg (1MB, 4008x2212px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4008x2212px

BEHOLD...

The Rack

If Gamescom features a functioning Star System say Stanton or one of the others with all the planets and their work in progress Cities and a Star at the center would that return the hype do you think?
If Citizencon has SQ42 functioning with a release schedule would that make people happy?

File: eJwFwUESgyAMAMC_8ADSRBTwD7300DsDiHSwOCQ9dfy7u3_1G02tahc5eQVIlWMfSbP0EUrWpffScjgr69gPCCIh7kf-CgOZ2Vtrp8Vbg5ZwQSD_QDSOkHCa0TtH8Hy906dtutRNXTcCxyJV.zGr3Iv_RCHcex04oLKTPNflsF3k.gif (116KB, 280x419px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 280x419px

>>186038313
... coming in an update some time 2020.
...
neat cloud bridge thou'.

File: EscapedCancerPatient.png (871KB, 1067x540px) Image search: [Google]

871KB, 1067x540px

>>186039289
>functioning star system
>CIG struggling to get shit done on time
>GaymesCon little over a week from now
Boredgaymer you should just stick with the JewTube parrot-talk and chug 'em cancer pillz.

>>186039515
He looks like an autistic boy george.

File: eJwNxcsNwyAMANBdGADztSHbIIJIqqQg7J6i7t6-y3vUZ11qU4fI5A1gP7mOtWuWsUpvuo_Rr1bmybqOG4pIqcfd3sLgKGJCon_GeTQhgMvekkuIIedEhjyBDYksphi9y0G_ZlffH8IrIpY.vF41W2z1eHYPjinojWBCN8N-SwA.jpg (37KB, 676x676px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 676x676px

>>186040406
Well he is on 'em anti depressants, looks like a fucking cancer patient and is so positive about everything and anything, although that might be as a result with all 'em happy daffy pills.

File: sp2KqjY.gif (509KB, 1000x268px) Image search: [Google]

509KB, 1000x268px

>>186036025

File: 1414519914209.jpg (50KB, 294x295px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 294x295px

>>186042393
delayed for October cuntfirmed??
Gief sauce :<

File: 3MbPEy1.png (344KB, 1000x1409px) Image search: [Google]

344KB, 1000x1409px

>>186042619

>>186036025
If we are going to keep dropping off after 10 post you might want to put NMS in the op, I doubt anyone wants to talk about it but with the recent update it might be enough to keep us alive.

File: hexameme.png (458KB, 1117x591px) Image search: [Google]

458KB, 1117x591px

>>186037239

>>186039289
If they have all that functioning at Gamescom and still don't have a 3.0 release, I'm getting my money back. They can make all the cutscenes and prerenders with someone else's money if they aren't going to deliver anything playable. Fuck this open development lie.

File: eJwFwdsNwyAMAMBdGADH5mGcbRBBJFVSELhfVXfv3dd85m12c6qOtQMc1yp9HnZpn7lV23pvd83jWrb0B7JqLudT37qAfBBmdlHYIxNGBBJ0hMTkN-HkHW2ATjikGL2ExPY1mvn9Ab_HIog.DLKWndcotJq_ChGyFdz_Ds_BxMM.jpg (134KB, 500x608px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 500x608px

>>186043887
Bleh doesn't say October, I for one think they'll (((delay))) 3.0 for late December to the last minute where they're closing up shop for their fat winter vacation.
I also believe that even THEN after a WHOLE YEAR of (((delays))) 3.0 will still be a buggy mess which won't see any actual fixes for 6 months MINIMUM.
Then again Imma be busy in that time period so I guess I'll 'manage' but not sure if the project as a whole will.

File: 1498091144940.jpg (46KB, 509x508px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 509x508px

How will cultists rationalize away Chris getting booed on stage when he announces that 3.0 still isn't ready and they don't have any SQ42 footage yet?

Reminder to just play Oolite for free

File: are you shittin me.jpg (40KB, 451x451px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 451x451px

>>186049384
>Chris getting booed on stage
That will never happen and you know it.

Is anyone going to gamescom? I heard you can play 2.6.3 right from the show floor.

Reminder that No Man's Sky is on sale and is actually delivering on all the promises Star Citizen failed to keep.

>>186058028
Yeah and they have a team of like, what, less than 20 people. At least they are steadily progressing to catch up with all the talk they accidentally spilled out. This is actually testament to the fact they were forced to release the game before it was ready. But what does Chris do? Nothing but telling more lies.

>>186058028
Yea I'm getting into it it's pretty chill. Not a fan of how your pitch and YAW can get stuck though. You need to turn the opposite direction to slow it down instead of just cantering.

Also once I get my hyperspace stuff ready to go can I just skip the campaign and do missions/fighting/exploration etc?

>>186052296
Happened at Citizencon when they announced no SQ42 was quite audible in the videos.

>>186058801
I don't get why companies like Hello and Zero Gravity can show steady progress and actually get features in their games while CIG has more resources than both of them combined and still can't get a bare featured base model of the game they want to make out.

>>186059814
>Also once I get my hyperspace stuff ready to go can I just skip the campaign and do missions/fighting/exploration etc?

Yes

>>186059835
Because CIG are scammers and the other devs are actually trying to make games.

>>186059814
>Yea I'm getting into it it's pretty chill

I bought it on sale and it's really quite a relaxing and pretty game. Not boring like Elite and not a glorified tech demo like Star Citizen.

Why doesn't it have general?

>>186060159
Didnt deliver on expectations and it died after release due to negative reviews.

File: ScreenShot0029.jpg (216KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

216KB, 1920x1080px

>>186038313
that's an odd way to nickname the Carrie but i respect your misguided opinion :^)

check out my Herrie

>>186060159
I could only ask this because it's an anon board, but do you get hopelessly lost and lose your ship?
I like chill survival and mining, but not if I lose my camp or whatever like every other game.
>set up camp
>go looking for supplies
>forget where camp is after a few turns
>repeat from top
The only reason I can play Astroneer is the tethers always lead back to the pod.
Is NMS idiot proof enough for me?

Also, you're probably in the general. We could let the thread die and say fuck CIG and their (((ship sales))), only released mmo space games allowed.

File: 1481100603405.png (1MB, 591x1999px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 591x1999px

>>186049384
they'll shut the fuck up real quick when that highly controlled cinematic mode trailer and then solo, non-netcode driven gameplay demo comes on screen and start rubbing their rock hard little nippies

>>186060691
>but do you get hopelessly lost and lose your ship?

Nope. It's always on the radar and this new patch has a ship summon button.

>>186060813
And then it's over 12 minutes later with no SQ42 and turns out it's just a Miles Eckhart2.0 demo. There is no applause. Everyone just gets up and leaves.

>>186060159
might as well integrate NMS, i don't think anyone is going to complain about a 3rd source of posters keeping the thread from dying.

but if you're on some high horse about your indie game barely surviving the mortal social media wounds it sustained from ACTUALLY lying their asses off, you can fuck off to /PS4G/ or reddit

>>186061076
>might as well integrate NMS

Agreed. No reason to keep it out. People play it and it's a space game. Good enough for me.

>>186060936
not sure how long they can keep inserting the HYPE IV and not releasing the patch. theres a point where people arent going to just see some sick game footage and forget about how they can't play it over and over.

gimme my steak dinner and let me leave the hospital, or kindly pull the plug plz

>>186060889
>It's always on the radar and this new patch has a ship summon button.
All right fuck it. I'm in. I don't want the bad vibes from torrenting it, so I threw them fuckers some money.
For some reason, I implicitly trust the opinions of a few anons more than the thousands of names out there with something to sell.
>>186061076
>>186061320
So, let it die, then /edg/nms/ ?
Seriously, fuck CIG and their threadkilling lies. /scg/ if 3.0, which probably means never.

>>186061583
>Seriously, fuck CIG and their threadkilling lies.

Amen

Why is the world full of so many people who willingly choose to be retarded

>>186061583
If /edg/ wants to fuck off with /nms/ and leech of a new host thats fine. We've been planning to separate the general at the launch of 3.0 anyway.

no three game general though thats just cancer.

>>186063637
suits me.
/scg/ can just stay dead for all I care.

in NMS, do the people flying over my starting point mean anything?

>>186063637
Could just go with /ssg/ - Space Sim General and include /edg/ /scg/ /nms/ in the op. These games alone don't sustain traffic for their own threads yet

>>186063834
>yet.
and fuck no with space sim general. We've been over this again and again, two games shits up a thread enough, three makes it unreadable for any coherent of meaningful discussion/question or whatever. Multigame threads are just circle jerks of in jokes, rivalry and memes.

E:D is a dead game, NMS is a Stillborn game, neither will ever be anything. SC will eventually be a game, it's still in its dev cycle, E:D and NMS are through theirs and will never be anything more than what they are.

>>186064518
>still has hope

Lol.
I'm thinking of getting nms guys, is it actually OK now? How does it run on pc?

>>186058028
Reminder that No Man's Sky have minimalist gameplay, no physic engine, no depth at all over its 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 planets with nonsensical random generation, to the point that any shitty fetch quest count as an improvement.

>>186059825
>Zero Gravity
HELLION aren't building the foundation for enormous destructible spaceship battle between 64+ players simultaneously, they won't have planets, fauna/flora/atmosphere, enormous cities, ground vehicle, thousand of NPC (one of the most difficult things to program), a large scale economy, spaceships for several distinct gameplay like racing or hacking, they won't have 5 alien species and care much less about animation, mocap or fidelity.

Making regular demos slow down development and indy game only get away with it because their entire game require less features to work together than SC do for a mining ship. The smaller fanbase is amazed when HELLION can publish a 90s tier gameplay in a creative way.
But CIG have to deals with thousands of retards who don't know how much work is needed for them to facesit on another player.

>I don't get why companies
Now I hope you do and avoid criticizing large companies for putting exponentially more work into their product than smaller companies.

>>186064518
You act like there is meaningful discussion in these threads anyhow.

Should just rename the general to Shitting in Space.

>>186063768
>in NMS, do the people flying over my starting point mean anything?

Nah it's kind of a cutscene.

>>186065379
>Reminder that No Man's Sky have minimalist gameplay, no physic engine, no depth at all over its 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 planets with nonsensical random generation, to the point that any shitty fetch quest count as an improvement.

I can tell you haven't played it recently because the patches have really elevated the game. There's all kinds of content now and it isn't easy to get bored.

I mean if people can continue to play ED they can play NMS. At least NMS isn't dull as watching paint dry from an art standpoint.

>>186065403
It's kinda cool though.
>>186065090
It does fine for me. Max settings and butter smooth, even on hard drive and not ssd
>>186065379
This is not the game everyone was memeing about. It took me 20 minutes to get off the starting planet which was a heat hazard, and almost died on the next planet which was radiation. I'm also naming my planets after neighborhood streets. It may not be super deep, but it has way more to offer than SC will for 2 more years. Either enjoy what is basically a new game, or keep looking at your schedule for reassurance.

File: 1502305236869.png (463KB, 593x665px) Image search: [Google]

463KB, 593x665px

>>186060649
>transparent gas planet

>>186061583
>All right fuck it. I'm in. I don't want the bad vibes from torrenting it, so I threw them fuckers some money.
for 20euros , I did it as well, after 1 more year, it could be a good game acutally.
What bothers me is the navigation system is completely shit, there is no planetary map. if you for example discover a landmark on a planet, can't you just select it as your new waypoint and fly over there?

>>186065090
on my i7 , gxt 960 I am struggiling with max 40 fps in low/borderless. - in comparison, I can play the witcher 3 on max with 50-60 fps
The optimalisation is completely batshit, it is sad.

File: 1490207634078.png (146KB, 861x960px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 861x960px

>harmful rain on the canopy while you are sorting inventory for the first time.

Lost all hope for this general the moment NMS playing subhumans were allowed to post.

Uniteractive floating orb """multiplayer""" doesn't make a shit game good.

Lost all hope for this general the moment NMS playing subhumans were allowed to post.

Uniteractive floating orb """multiplayer""" doesn't make a shit game good.

>>186065472
I don't consider highly of E:D either. So my point still stand. ED have nothing to do on planet, and from playtester I trust, he like the game. But myself I'm only seeing very basic grind/craft.
It elevated a lot because it started very low.

Perhaps NMS could become amazing if the power of its procedural generation was used within a multi-feature gameplay. They have modular building, biological analysis, resources collection, vehicles, terraforming...
I'm not the only one thinking they can have you terraform an entire planet, create its fauna and flora. Taking it where SPORE was supposed to end up.
But it will take a lot of balance work, at best, maybe they needed the money to do that, but until then SC is definitively doing gameplay before proc gen content

>>186065716
>Either enjoy what is basically a new game, or keep looking at your schedule for reassurance.
You are entitled to your taste no matter what they are.
But it is stupid to believe all game are equal in scale and development effort. Little details can take a fucking lot of work.

btw, I'm looking forward SC dealing with environmental hazard even more. Dealing with oxygen is one things, adding suit fuel and dealing with stamina will up the ante. And thankfully they abandoned moving around by grabbing handles.

>>186069394
i5 with a 390. I'll be ok surely?

>>186070143
>>186070081
>posting the same post twice

Are you angry or waiting for SC or something?

>>186071672
Probably even worse, its CPU bottlenecked

>>186071797
People can't handle it.
>in a just a few short years, SC will have multiplayer and base building with your friends and then NMS won't be shit
Maybe, that's years away though. Hello is updating their game now, and they aren't even trying to lock out pirated copies.

>>186064518
/egg/ does perfectly fine and that general hosts like 90 ded games

dod

Played roughly 10 hours of NMS.

If you are like me and wanted to play it mostly from your ship, don't buy it or instantly refund.

The flying in this game is absolute dog shit regardless of what you use (k+m/controller/hotas).

I want to slide my dick between Cherie's tits while she tells me about lewd lore and fawns over my cock

File: chrisR4.jpg (101KB, 928x600px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 928x600px

>>186078885
you get Ben

>>186078396
Steam allowed unconditional refunds for NMS the week after release, what did you expect?

>>186079076
The content was alright and the missions had me interested.

But I hated it as soon as I got back in the ship.

>>186079036
NO

>>186078885
I'd pay good money for Cherie to lovingly jerk me off while I suck on her tits.

File: 1478284827280.jpg (24KB, 321x322px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 321x322px

>>186078396
>hotas with fucking NMS

File: 1499885779868.png (931KB, 636x960px) Image search: [Google]

931KB, 636x960px

>autists wants split the thread again

NO

>>186080358
She loojs like she has Prussian genes. If you have an inverted nipple fetish its gunna get good.

>>186081439
MOMMY MILKY

File: JUST powerplant.png (553KB, 536x859px) Image search: [Google]

553KB, 536x859px

>4 days of homeless santa playing 2.6 at the gamescom booth
!raffle

>>186059950
Yes, although you might want to do the questlines far enough to get a home base and an atlas pass card

>Oh no, other anons are having fun with a game I don't like.
>Better remind them that it is weeks not months now before SC is on top.

File: UltimateShitGrin.gif (564KB, 800x430px) Image search: [Google]

564KB, 800x430px

>>186087371

File: 1462165146770.jpg (59KB, 1001x1147px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 1001x1147px

>>186081270
This, splitting the thread will just make both generals dead. Atleast this way it stays bumped with shitposts until something interesting happens.

>>186084769
They are going to call the 4 days of streaming off when 3.0 isn't ready right? They aren't going to unironically stream 2.6.3 for 4 days, are they?

>stopped playing ED a year ago
>left /scg/
>come back
>SCfags are STILL waiting for 3.0

what the fuck man

if you believe this shit is coming out ever you need to take prozac or some shit

>>186078396
>play it mostly from your ship
>hotas
o7 CMDR how are the kids?

>>186090747
A bunch of us jumped on NMS because it is actually being updated and is pretty good now. It's not the ship flying game, but it's pretty, plays well(for me, others listed trouble), and has at least enough to do that I'll still be playing when SC ever gets around to catching up to the end of 2016.

>>186090262
When they streamed last year they thought it was fine to spend like 2 hours straight each day just looking at the hangar.

>>186091060
>"build" prefab bases to store all those resources that you don't need
yeah it has loads to do

NMS is Minecraft in space except they forgot to add creativity to make it fun

>>186090747
So strange how there is so many people that are "just coming back" to see that 3.0 isn't out, yet the poster count stays relatively the same at the end of the threads.

Really jump-starts my jellybeans.

>>186091060
Why the fuck are there so many NMS shills in this thread? No one wants to play your shitty game.

>>186091074
>4 days of the developer streaming their own game years in the making
>less than 1000 views because it is 1.5 year old content.
>>186091284
Never said it was the end all spess game, but saying NMS is shit because you are waiting for SC is just spiting yourself.
It's not super great, but it's easily number 2 in actually released games and won't be knocked off by SC anytime soon.
>>186091579
>No one
You say that.

>>186091715
>easily number 2
>in actually released games
>NMS is all of the sudden a released "game"
Seriously? You are obviously shilling your heart out. I hope they are paying you.

>>186091975
This, NMS might actually be vaguely close to what they promised with the new update, but even that's up in the air.

>>186091975
The turning point was them showing that they are developing the multiplayer still. That was the reason I didn't buy it at launch. It isn't fully developed, and I wouldn't pay full price for it, but you're fucking retarded if you think $23 is too much for what you do get.
>>186092306
They didn't have to do any of this. Hello could have just moved on. SC has just been stalled for long enough that other companies are closing the gap, and actually playable today with full features. I didn't like NMS at first, but they delivered a pretty comfy experience and sold it at a good price.

>>186093539
>They didn't have to do any of this. Hello could have just moved on.
lol

>>186093539
>but you're fucking retarded if you think $23 is too much for what you do get
>oh it totally doesn't matter they already fucked a bunch of people out of 60
You are missing the point. By buying NMS you are just supporting shitty business practices that are like a tumor to the gaming industry. Fuck NMS, fuck the studio behind it and fuck anyone who supports that steaming pile of shit game.

>>186094007
>shitty business practices that are like a tumor to the gaming industry.
Like KS games that continue to sell jpegs without delivering a game, only they are going to make you think the game is about to be released until the sale is over, then delay the patch by months. Shitty practices like that?
If you know an actually virtuous company to do business with, post them. Neither Hello or CIG is even close to being saints, but that shit was $23.
SC expects us to reserve judgment until it is released and criticizes those who judge it now. NMS has already been judged and continues to be updated anyway. That should say something.

>>186094598
I can literally give a fuck less about CIG or Star Citizen. I was talking about how shitty NMS and Hello are and then you just come back with "Oh well CIG does it so that makes what Hello did with NMS ok". Plus, that logic doesn't even make sense. You can't even compare the two because one studio released a pile of shit as a full retail game, CIG releases piles of shit as "slices of the full PU" or as tech demos. CIG doesn't claim that their pile of shit is a full game.

>>186094598
>NMS has already been judged and continues to be updated anyway. That should say something.
Yea it says that Hello games is trying to save face after they blatantly took a shit on all their customers. They are hoping that the people who were super salty and loud about it at release got their first week refunds and are hoping people like you get tricked into believing their bullshit so they can make that money back.

>>186095331
>I can literally give a fuck less about CIG or Star Citizen
in /scg/
>CIG doesn't claim that their pile of shit is a full game
Let's hold up for a minute and consider how long both of these took to make. If Sony had backed CIG instead of Hello, SC would be the early release disaster that took a year to hit minimums for people to buy. NMS started a year after SC, and had to make their own engine. They did it with less than 20 people.
It's not fair to compare the two because CIG is getting btfo, and I'm a backer saying that.
>>186095787
We really got to lack self awareness to give CIG all this deference and keep a thread up for a dead game when a single trip to the movies will get you a full release with a 30 hour campaign expansion. That may sound like a shill, but it isn't. This echo chamber just makes new ideas sound funny.

File: 1466738552432.jpg (23KB, 326x452px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 326x452px

>>186096759
>I can literally give a fuck less about CIG or Star Citizen.
>in /scg/.
Wow it is almost like there are 2 games talked about in this general

>it's all (insert publisher here)'s fault waaahhh!
>I might sound like a shill but I am totally not a shill.
Try harder.

File: 1500103430889.jpg (60KB, 680x680px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 680x680px

>>186097863
>ED is a game and is the main reason for the thread.
lmao, no. This thread is never raised for ED. You dads are adorable, but don't pretend ED has what it takes to carry the thread. We all know how that ends. ED is window dressing and good for a few bumps. When 2.4 comes out, you guys will get your week in the sun, then the thread will die again when the inevitable disappointment in Sandro's decisions makes itself evident.

>>186098335
>projecting
I never said E:D was the main reason for this thread. You were wondering why I was here if I didn't like star citizen and I answered you. I used to play E:D and I came here to see if it made any progress.

Just a little harder.

>>186096759
>It's not fair to compare the two because CIG is getting btfo, and I'm a backer saying that.
>CIG got BTFO by the greatest video game PR disaster of all time
Sure they did. Finish your fucking game, Shaun.

>>186098335
>runs out of shit to say
>mumbles incoherently about something irrelevant
You done yet?

>>186096759
>come into a thread
>start talking about how one of the two main games of the thread is shit an stir up a completely artificial divide
>I'm not a shill! You guys are just overly defensive! Fucking echo chamber!

File: 5bf.jpg (16KB, 480x318px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 480x318px

>>186098847
>not here for either game. I'm too cool for this shit. I'm totally lurking for ED news.
I'm so fucking sure.
>>186099103
>greatest PR disaster in gaming
>not talking about CIG screwing their backers for years over jpegs
>>186099265
>>186099375
You punkins are on fire today aren't you? Tell me more. We'll hit the bump limit for sure.

File: contemplating.png (319KB, 1028x880px) Image search: [Google]

319KB, 1028x880px

Just let it die and don't bring it back until Gamescom.

>>186099472
>>greatest PR disaster in gaming
>>not talking about CIG screwing their backers for years over jpegs
CIG doing shitty things doesn't make them a bigger disaster than Hello Games. What reality do you live in? Is there a reality where NMS came out and it was well-received? Is that where you're from?

CIG's gotten plenty of well-deserved shit over the years but nothing can compare to the ass-reaming that Hello Games got.

File: leo laugh.jpg (51KB, 704x470px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 704x470px

>>186099472
>CIG
>PR Disaster
>About to pocket another mil by the weekend from a deluded cult of whales while still getting to claim "le alpha xD"
>Meanwhile NMS gets trashed and refunded en masse forever muddying it and its developers' names

File: PlanetaryLanding_2.jpg (658KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

658KB, 1920x1080px

What is the most archetypal Dad ship?

Sidewinder, Cobra, ASP, or something else?

File: ULTRA DAD.png (11KB, 1841x132px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 1841x132px

>>186100058
Are you new? It's the Dadbra.

>>186099472
>not here for either game.
Except I just got done telling you I came here to see if E:D was worth getting back into. You are just spewing incoherent trash at this point dude, go to bed.

>>186099645
>>186099836
> nothing can compare to the ass-reaming that Hello Games got.
> forever muddying it and its developers' names
You both are absolutely correct. But that shit already happened. The game wasn't fundamentally bad, it just wasn't finished. This is the same exact criticism we level against CIG every day. CIG just didn't have Sony's gun to their head. If you don't want to play on principle, can't argue that. I just can't continue to stay mad at a dev trying to update their game and deliver on features in the face of what happened to them.
I don't live in the past. It plays good, it looks good, and it has expansions and plenty of shit to do until CIG gets around to whenever the fuck they feel like releasing something.

>>186100407
I never gave a shit about NMS or the drama. If I wanted to play Minecraft with shitty space ships, I'd install a minecraft mod and probably have a better game. I think it's great that they're actually trying to take responsibility for their monumental fuck up, though, and turn it into an actual game, even if it ends up mediocre.

But saying that CIG has/has had worse PR than NMS is just incorrect, which is exactly what >>186099472 seemed to be claiming.

>>186100709
>I never gave a shit about NMS or the drama.
I never did either. I had written it off. Then they released their first version of multiplayer along with a supposed 30 hour campaign expansion, didn't try to patch out pirates, and put the game on 60% off.
Fuck me if they aren't trying.

>>186099836
NMS wouldve gotten away with it if they sold it as a "work in progress early access totally unfinished indie game plz bear with us" type deal for $30

but they sold it as a $60 fully finished AAA title GOTY material game and people were dumb enough to believe it

>>186100225
>if E:D was worth getting back into

Not part of this conversation but it really isn't.

Nothing has fundamentally changed with ED.

>>186100184
The Cobra was a favorite, but they also do weird things like spending tons of cash on paint jobs for Sidewinder. The ASP generally seemed to be their dream ride that they aspired to own someday, and I remember a few of them having obsessions with "stealth diamondbacks"

File: no mans lie.jpg (161KB, 1201x901px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 1201x901px

>>186100407
>I just can't continue to stay mad at a dev trying to update their game and deliver on features in the face of what happened to them
I agree with the rest of your post except for here where you try to paint HG as the hapless victim pitted against LE EVIL CORPORATION SONY.
I find it implausible that HG and Sean had no control over their communication with their community. At the end of the day, it was them who hyped it up for sales and then massively failed to deliver (probably due to naivety in regards to Sony's deadlines).

I also don't think they should be held up as heroes for simply delivering on what they had already promised months and months later. Sure, they could have just taken the initial sales money and ran, forever ruining their chances at ever making games again, but instead they're just taking the higher of the lower roads.

So I just started NMS and I'm blown away by how smooth this runs.

>>186102865
>I also don't think they should be held up as heroes for simply delivering on what they had already promised months and months later.

Why not? I mean it's better conduct than what CIG and Frontier have done.

I mean I know who I'm going to give money to again if they make another game.

>>186103137
Mate CIG and FDev are pretty low bars. I wouldn't give money to any of the three.

>>186102865
No heroes but as a dev my self I respect them for what they are doing. Honestly back when it happened I thought that if I were in their shoes I'd consider leaving the game industry to work on private and government simulation stuff.
Also while they were probably complaisant in Sony's fuckery I know from experience if can be unexpectedly intoxicating when people with lots of money get excited about your work.

>>186103557
Just saying one of those three 'games' is updating and is actually fun.

>>186103137
CIG has never claimed their game is finished.

So NMS has,
>muh Sony
SC has
>muh goons
and E:D has
>muh dads

Did I get that right?

>>186103861
Still not worth it in my opinion, even on sale. But that's coming from someone who rarely buys games unless I know there will be great replay value, and from what I've seen in this new update, there's still nothing to address the fact that after 5 or so planets, you've seen them all. (Also not sure why they've added static base building to an infinite exploration game where the goal is to keep moving towards the center).

>>186104203
SC has
>muh jpegs

>>186104743
>(Also not sure why they've added static base building to an infinite exploration game where the goal is to keep moving towards the center).
Yeah, that's confusing to me, too. The goal of getting to the center is really not a very good goal in an open sandbox game.

I have the same problem with games like Factorio or Starbound. In Starbound, there's some REALLY good building mechanics, with lots of materials to choose from, but you're constantly on the move, so it's kind of a waste. In Factorio, I get bored halfway through because the end-game goal of building the rocket is completely fucking useless and doesn't do anything so what's the point

>>186104806
hehe ya

>citizencon
>3.0

HAHAHAHAHAH suck it up and wait another year

but dont worr,y next jpg is soon and for sure

>>186105087
I think it's just games trying to copy Minecraft without understanding what Minecraft really is, and that is a complete sandbox with no hard goals whatsoever.

>>186104806
Well yea but my post was supposed to show who those communities blame their problems on.

File: 1458699659609.png (459KB, 1024x746px) Image search: [Google]

459KB, 1024x746px

>>186105728
>I think it's just games trying to copy Minecraft
If only No man's sky wasn't trying to copy Minecraft so hard, maybe then it would be a good game!

>>186106152
ED hates the Dads, but Sandro is mostly to blame.

Likewise SC hates the goons, but blame is mostly leveled towards some worthless fuck on the dev team. I'm not sure who though, but recently they've been making fun of some ham planet that will soon lose his eyes to diabetes.

>>186105087
>The goal of getting to the center
They have supposedly reworked the main story
>Atlas Rises, brings a brand new and overhauled central storyline
Whatever that means, I just started for the first time.

So the game is telling me to set up a scanner to find a drop pod except that option is greyed out, what am I doing wrong?

>>186100184

>Ben Ryder

the batshit insane "'Leader'" of Pranav Antal of Mongolia

of course

File: CxA0vfmWIAADjT3.jpg:orig.jpg (20KB, 480x456px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 480x456px

>>186108504
>Atlas Rises, brings a brand new and overhauled central storyline
>overhauled central storyline
>central storyline
>central
:^)

File: Pathetic interloper.webm (3MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1280x720px

>scedg is now also nmsg

If anyone still cares.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdIhA3XsiZA

>>186112419
Has anyone ever cared about Citizens of the Stars? Wake me up on Thursday.

Maybe Wednesday if it's gonna be a Cherie week, but other than that fuck off.

If we're doing NMS now, then I have a question. I played a bit of it when it first came out, and just bought it. Last year, I couldn't walk 10feet without tripping over some minable material, or pick up 3 monuments with every scan. Now, everything seems rarer. Did they adjust this, or did I start in a sparse system?

File: edsteam.png (161KB, 752x547px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 752x547px

>>186064518
>E:D is a dead game
>4,000+ players online every day on Steam alone
wew

File: NMSstat.jpg (54KB, 739x546px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 739x546px

>>186116406
>meanwhile

>>186116406
>>186117058
>ED drops 10% over the last month and is trending noticeably down since July.
>NMS grows each month, with over 100% growth in the last 30 days.
ED is, in fact, a dead game. 6k people is dead as shit. NMS is even more dead, but holding ED up as an example of a not dead game is pants on head retarded. PUBG has 600k 24h peak.

File: nms.png (107KB, 736x382px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 736x382px

>>186117058
Look at the all-time chart. True, One Man's Lie is enjoying a massive spike of players right now, owing mainly to people hyping up the new update ("OMG it's not shit anymore I swear!!!"), but it's already starting to drop. In a month's time, it'll be back where it was, mark my words.

>>186117690
Look at this chart, man. The game has had fewer players per day for most of its life than ED has had in its recent decline.
>PUBG has 600k 24h peak
>hurr let's compare a niche sim title to one of the most popular games in existence right now

File: nms2.png (62KB, 718x410px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 718x410px

>>186117690
>>186117925
Oh, and here are the numbers, in case the chart's difficult to read.

>>186118091
>Jumps from 1,694 to 19,017 peak players with one patch
You see guys, this game is actually shit you just have to look at the numbers a certain way.

>>186105087
>Yeah, that's confusing to me, too. The goal of getting to the center is really not a very good goal in an open sandbox game.
A lot of parallel have been made with the game SPORE by the developers.
The endgame of SPORE was to reach the center of the galaxy (cutting through a race who hate life) and there I heard you get a technology to terraform planet in mass, that's what I heard, I player SPORE but I couldn't bothered to do the extremely repetitive grind and terraforming process needed to have the fuel to get there.

In any case that's may be why they chose this goal.
IMO I wouldn't consider that a bad goal, if it was a spaceship centric game, which it is not.

>Factorio
The version 0..16 just got out with drastic change as well, now you don't have to kill alien to get science resources and the rocket became another mean of generating the last science.
So it's still a sandbox without a clear ending, but now the rocket isn't the ending.

File: nomanssky.gif (1MB, 245x225px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 245x225px

>>186118410
>Number of players is already dropping
>not expecting the set trend to continue
>trusting a bearded man

>>186118410
>patch gets lauded as "how the game was supposed to be"
>everyone who got burned gives it another shot
>they'll probably all drop the game in a week again when it doesn't live up

cumming inside cherie's slutty little mouth

>>186118832
Maybe. I don't need it to last until the end of time. It just needs to be playable until Chris is done diddling himself with a motorized fleshlight synced to summoning threads.

>>186120668
I'm not saying someone should kidnap Cherie or anything, I'm just saying that if someone DID kidnap her, I'd pay a lot of money to get her in my basement so I could fuck her until she's addicted to my cock and loves me and constantly begs for her master's cum.

File: 1460289518747.gif (2MB, 350x279px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 350x279px

>they still think no man's sky has a chance
*inhales*
hahahahahahaha

So how is the Gladiator? I'm tempted to pick one up during the next sale.

>>186110118
good god people paid more than $20 for that

>>186128003
"average"

it's the ship you'll be spending alot of time in for SQ42 and i assume it's the baseline standard that they balance around by price

>>186129348
I get the feeling you're talking about the Gladius.

ded

File: corvettes.jpg (457KB, 1440x405px) Image search: [Google]

457KB, 1440x405px

Which is better? Aside from one being a JPG.

>>186132887
I think E:D's is a bit more realistic

File: 69q6e3pifsfz.png (659KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

659KB, 1440x2560px

>laughing sluts.jpg

>>186135967
So instead of working towards the game release they work on specific _demo_ once again. Has there been any confirmation of people quitting their jobs at CIG? If I was working there I'd have quit already.

>>186138929
I'm not sure why people thought they were grinding super hard on anything but the demo going into a game con.
They can't delay a demo. It has to be done on time. Patch for the game? Whenever they fell like it.

>>186132887
I've never touched SC in any capacity but something gives me the impression that ship TTK is lower in SC than in ED, so I guess the JPG has the advantage there. In terms of practicality of design, the Fed Corvette wins out.

>>186135967
If it is as good as last years presentation I'll be satisfied.

>>186105087
You can now teleport between your base and a space station, so basically you can always pop back home no matter how far out you've gone

>>186140221
>>186140221
Of course it looks good but it's just another fake demo to make people pay more money. The actual 3.0 release isn't any closer.

>>186140459
Who cares if 3.0 releases closer they are now at the point where they don't need to fake anything so they'll just demo future tech/content.

>>186135967
>biggest reveal yet
What could it be?

>>186140679
Miles Eckhart 2.0

>>186141005
Woah I hope they made his glass hexagonal.

>>186141073
Not the glass, but the ice. Follow the "cube"

>>186140679
Its gonna be the "game changing" Origin 600i

So apparently when a thargroot barnacle encounter bugs out and doesn't disable you, you can pin the bug to the ground with a big enough ship and pound it with phasing sequence until it dies. Evidently it blows up like a human ship and leaves behind anaconda-looking debris.

>>186141213
Some on leddit think the gamechanger might be a minelayer ship. Makes sense Lesnik was a big fan of that ship back when they were voting on ships to add to the game and they've mentioned mines now several times in ATVs and lore posts.

>>186142983
>adding even more objects that have to be tracked when the netcode is already shitting itself
Sounds like something Ben would come up with, alright

File: 802036835da725ec1a1b3da429136851c2015fc8290f9f7dbed8a7fd00426250.png (186KB, 500x279px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 500x279px

>>186135967
Biggest reveal yet??
I guess they'll not allow Chris the Drunk get on stage making tall tales and allow Erin the brother do the talkin'.
Oh and "mandatory" .jpeg sale

>>186142983
How the fuck would that be gamechanging? My vote is a ship for planetside base construction.

>>186140547
Do you not understand what I posted? You fucking fool.

File: 2017.png (1MB, 971x851px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 971x851px

The big suprise for Gamescom is the Titan Suit Reveal.

Believe it or not, I don't care. This is to prove me true for future leaks. You'll see on the 25th.

>>186138929
The post about a demo was from last year dipshits.

Regarding this years gamescom, CIG is fucked either way. They make a demo, they get shit on for spending time on a demo when 3.0 isn't done. They don't, and they get shit on for not showing anything interesting at gamescom.

>>186145258
thank you leaker

>>186145325
Eh, most of the fanbase seem to have Stockholm syndrome, so regardless of how upset they get, they'll forgive them in a week or two

>>186139838
It actually depends quite a bit.There are weapons will have functionally infinite ammo capacity limited only by heat generation in firing times, that do moderate damage over time. Then there's things like railguns or missile launchers with limited ammo but huge burst damage. Then on top of things, you can target specific modules on a ship with a sub-targetting system to destroy specific parts of the enemy ship, such as their powerplant or engines, resulting in an almost instant kill. And then that's not even taking in modifications and upgrades you can perform to said weapons and said systems to add things like laser damage to your miniguns, shield overload functionality to your missiles, extra armor for your powerplant, etc. I rather like ED's combat system aside from the relentless grinding required to really reach it's end level.

>>186144610
Drop a distress beacon close to a damaged ship put down mines around it disable rescue seekers then board and loot them?

File: ahhh kermit.jpg (18KB, 547x328px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 547x328px

>>186145258
give more leaks
what's the status of SQ42

How do I find dudes to kill in elite dangerous? I'm already at high intensity conflict zones but all I see are some federation ships and some other ships with a greyish 'lawless' status fighting each other, but no one is wanted.

>>186145656
If both ships were pulled out of their respective games and put on neutral ground where they were scaled in range of each other, who would win?

>Corvette with full fighter bays and 10/10 engineering on the most cancerous meme build possible, with the old SCB penalties.

>Javelin with your choice of anything that will fit in the hangar. Stock equipment on all ships, but you get as many humans as you need and no one logs.

>>186146793
Right hand panel, functions tab, choose faction and prepare for dick. You're in a war zone, not a bounty hunting hotspot like a resource extraction site.

>>186147137
Thanks mate.

>>186147103
Elite ships are ridiculously durable. They routinely careen into asteroids and suffer little more than dents, assuming their shields even break, and they fly right into a star's corona to refuel.

>>186145656
>I rather like ED's combat system aside from the relentless grinding required to really reach it's end level.
The way you described SC's system makes it sound very much like ED.

>weapons will have functionally infinite ammo capacity limited only by heat generation in firing times
Beams, bursts, pulse lasers.

>Then there's things like railguns or missile launchers with limited ammo but huge burst damage.
Just like ED, except missiles were nerfed into the ground.

>you can target specific modules on a ship with a sub-targetting system to destroy specific parts of the enemy ship, such as their powerplant or engines, resulting in an almost instant kill.
Yup, exactly like ED. Excepting the "almost instant kill" part, which is where my original comment regarding TTK comes in.

>And then that's not even taking in modifications and upgrades you can perform to said weapons and said systems to add things like laser damage to your miniguns, shield overload functionality to your missiles, extra armor for your powerplant, etc.
In ED you can add hull damage to your lasers (normally good against shields) and shield damage to your cannons (normally good against hulls). You can also modify your modules to withstand more damage or increase performance in exchange for vulnerability.

>I rather like ED's combat system
That's probably because it's incredibly similar to SC's combat system. I never realized this before reading your post. Oh well.

File: chrisshockerts.png (15KB, 289x378px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 289x378px

>>186146436
Doesn't sound very gamechanging to me. Gamechanger implies that it will take the game in an entirely different direction than it set out to previously. The most logical thing would be base building since it
1. wasn't something previously planned for the game at all
2. fits in with the PP and outpost tech they've been working on and
3. has been hyped up by CR's unadulterated speculation since GC2016
I mean they will surely need a way to construct bases somehow, and I don't think materializing walls fits in with muh fidelity. My best guess is that it will be a ship with drones that construct a base based on a player's AR plans with a mobiGlas app.

>>186142983
Oh boy, another underpowered, overpriced specialty ship for a function that half a dozen existing ships *should* be able to do.

>>186147498
P.sure he was describing ED there. Most of that doesn't apply to SC at all.

>>186146728
Closer than you'd think but futher than you'd like.

File: eJwNxUEOhCAMAMC_8ACKtFDwNwQJmqgQqCfj33fnMq96xqlWtYv0uQJsx8xtbHpKG6kWXVurZ0n9mDq3C5JIyvtVbplg2fngmf8Zi94QgY24cPSOPQUkEyPCQoEdonORDel-V_X9AMH9IpU.zvellimTx5sD19JM8t5ezdks_qA.png (62KB, 486x332px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 486x332px

>>186113759
This goy knows..!

>>186147103
Large ED ships are crazy durable and agile(except yaw movement) compared to their SC equivalent. The Vette could literally circle strafe the destroyer to death.

slow and steady wins the race

>>186147430
>>186148310
>Elite ships are ridiculously durable
>Large ED ships are crazy durable and agile
I mentioned that the ships would be scaled in range of each other, so the Vette could get taken out, wouldn't make sense otherwise.
I think the Vette with good fighters would be tough to beat also. I just wonder how effective launching and recovering to a ship during combat is going to be in SC. Ship for ship would be the Vette, but the fighters would be the decider I think otherwise.

>>186145258
Dude i didnt even think of that, dope. Everyone keep it hush hush tho.

>>186149041
You'd need to nerf the ED fighters too. They punch like large ships and are squirrely little fucks.

>>186147189
Try RES Zones sometime mate. A system with pristine rings will always have some. Not only will system police help you out, you get more money per kill and don't piss off factions.

>>186149281
I was thinking the Vette would be in real trouble if the Javelin fighters were some Gladiators that could spam their torps and get back to reload.
It would have to be the Javelin taking the fight to the Vette for them to win I think. It just takes so much to wear an ED ship down that reacting to an attack would mean losing.

>>186147954
Q3 2018, can't wait

>>186149721
Torps do dick to shields in ED though unless they have feedback cascade mods. And even then if the vette is murderfit it'll have reactive armor and several hundred tons of reinforcement packages to protect internal components and repel kinetic/explosive damage while the shields are down. The state of ED's meta is completely broken even in its own game.

File: Screenshot_20170814-224158.jpg (136KB, 1419x395px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 1419x395px

:^)

>>186147759
Disregard my post, I suck cocks.

>>186150468
It's pretty fucking ridiculous to even think about. One murder fleet from ED could end the war with the Vanduul. What is a Driller going to do with a hull tank Sexual Assault Ship silent running and a disgusting amount of multicannons?

I'm still mass locked even though I'm going in the opposite direction of the planet for 20 minutes, is there anything I can do?

>>186151128
Screenshots.

File: Screenshot_0004.jpg (298KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

298KB, 1920x1080px

>>186151176

>>186151293
log out and log in again.

>>186151293
Have you tried relogging? There's nothing on your scope and you shouldn't be mass locked that far from a planet.

>>186151639
>>186151562
I did it and even went on solo play. Finally got out of it now just going forward.

>>186151293
>>186151794
Stealth comet confirmed.

Is there any difference between throttle and strafe forward in SC?

>>186155152
No. I swapped my throttle to double tap W and put forward strafe on W just for that reason. I made S spacebrake and left reverse on the default binding.

>>186155310
Sweet.

My mate sent me a couple of Force Feedback 2's to try dual sticks with so have to map one to strafe fwd/back.

>>186145258
agent got a new tripcode, nice

File: challenged to honorable combat.webm (536KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

536KB, 1920x1080px

>>186046689

File: gonnatalkshitgonnabeshit.png (161KB, 3000x3000px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 3000x3000px

>>186159741

>>186160151
Hutton orbital, 5 minutes. Be there or everyone will know you're a coward.

File: unknown (4).png (436KB, 482x491px) Image search: [Google]

436KB, 482x491px

>>186160328
Why? Do you need time to pray?
I'm always here.

>>186160664
>tfw 5 pips in WEP is actually possible with multicrew now

>>186145258
>This is to prove me true for future leaks.

That's not English.

Anyone here feel that Erin Roberts would be a better CEO for CIG?

I mean I loved Starlancer and it wasn't vaporware like Freelancer was.

>>186162083
Erin is already pretty much in control of CIG and from the Road to Citizencon you saw him lay down the law that they were not showing SQ42 instead using 3 days to put all resources on the Sandworm demo. CR is pretty much ensuring the game is as close to his ideas as possible by explaining what he wants and then telling people to make it better.

>>186163307
Good.

>>186036025
will star citizen have a breast slider? what kind of body customization?

>>186169869
>will star citizen have a breast slider?

Only for men.

File: Beta - about insurance.png (105KB, 1216x640px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 1216x640px

You know about the last "Citizen of the Star"
For all boring as you said it was going to be, there was interesting bit about ship insurances
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdIhA3XsiZA

Most is what we knew already
https://robertsspaceindustries.com/comm-link/transmission/12820-Insurance-FAQ-And-Update
- you must fill a claim, once done it remove your ship as a possession from you and flag it as stolen everywhere
- you pay upkeep to keep the insurance on a ship
- you pay more if you loose your ship too often
- fill too much claim and the insurance cost increase

The real question for us is how it will shape gameplay and how they'll catch fraud insurance out of those mechanics.
I remember hearing that the ship are identified both an ingame hull-ID but also a developers identifier. If that's the case I think it would be solid defense
- it allow a stolen ship to get a false legit ingame ID but not fool the developers
- if a player keep loosing ships who end up with people he know (friend/org/contact) it will be seen.
- if a player is paid real money to let his ship get stolen by strangers, the ship will still be flagged as stolen.
At this point I don't have anything about how they'll prevent a blackmarket other than having the ships too easy to obtain ingame to pay them with real money.

Does anyone see any goonery that still allow insurance fraud? Do you think any orgs could try to sell a Bengal carrier for real money?

also
http://www.pcgamer.com/how-star-citizens-ship-insurance-works-and-how-players-will-exploit-it/

>>186162083
To be fair, Freelancer got a surprising success and is STILL MODDED TODAY.
CR was replaced midway as the producer of Freelancer and Microsoft didn't care about all the feature he wanted funds for. They say "deliver a game ASAP".

Star Citizen is Freelancer v2 pushed 3 level above.

>>186169869
Apparently body types will be locked due to armor and ship seating clipping issues. While SQ42 might have varied types and NPCs the players will have to rely on spacepants, facial features and decals to look different.

>RNGneer my iEagle
>G3 thruster upgrade legit DOESN'T DO ANYTHING

I got maybe 30+ increase on top and boost which should not have happened

What am I doing wrong, are there guides on understanding the fucking retarded RNG sliders? I want to figure this out before I commit my bigger ships

>>186108729
It tells you to find ore deposit. Stop lying / being illiterate.

>>186173338
Yes after that, the sub quests told me to upgrade my suit for which I have to find a drop pod.

Turns out it won't work on your starting planet.

You're the illiterate one here.

>>186160913
>tfw multicrew is a buggy mess
>tfw pilot friend started falling asleep during combat

>>186173812
Never had it tell me to find a drop pod. Although I have apparently perma broke the base building quest chain by moving my base to a nicer planet in the middle of the intro building missions. Which means I also can't build rovers either, and I'm lacking a lot of basic weapon schematics

File: 1497215445136.jpg (3KB, 250x225px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 250x225px

are you anons really lusting after cherie's saggy mom tits?

File: 1453217280709.jpg (78KB, 472x472px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 472x472px

>>186145258
>Titan Suit Reveal
I wouldn't mind at all desu, I'm way more interested in planetside stuff than ship stuff

File: eJwNxW0OgyAMANC7cABKKB_qbQgScFNLaBezLN7dvT_vpz5jV4tqIp0XgHXjTGPVLDRSLboS1b2kvrHOdEASSbkd5RQGG32YQoz_jMVgnAM0dpoNOusjzmi983C170WvlN-6n1XdD1BeI6o.KrCXcdq2ExyKih3Ghz8v4Vm5kSM.png (6KB, 204x248px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 204x248px

>>186171192

>>186180604
>saggy mom tits
You say that like its a bad thing.

>>186171586
So does this mean insurance can cover hull repairs if the ship isn't completely destroyed?

>>186171586
>>186183834
This chart is easily 4 years old based on information even older.

File: ForumDad.png (74KB, 197x207px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 197x207px

>>186181161
His fucking arm looks like a stuffed ham.
fuck me.

Am I missing something or does the universe in SC currently comprise of quantum travel connect the dots, pirate killing and the odd griefer?

>>186189272
What gave you the impression that the game was anywhere close to finished?

>>186184550
people are just sentient meat sacks anon don't forget your position in this reality

>>186183834 >>186184427
I wouldn't be surprised if no-insurance meant higher repair cost.
This is own it work IRL and for SC insurances they pay less to keep ships running at 100% efficiency than they would replacing crippled ship all the time.

>>186184427
Look at the CotS linked, they don't go in length about insurance but it's the same ideas. They have no reason to change those beyond the balance cost.

>>186145258
Do want, I hope the dock fits in my cutelass

>>186189757
>Look at the CotS linked
I'd rather drag my dick across broken glass, thanks.

>>186173063
Dunno what your defect is. I boost to 859.

>>186173063
Are you using performance enhanced thrusters?

>>186199943
These are going to be worth so much ingame.

>>186201428
I don't think anyone would actually want that shitty skin.

So the referral contest is over? Did ReferralAnon enter or what? I want the MAGA hat at Gamescom. Perfect timing for it too.

File: Screenshot_3.png (612KB, 1314x564px) Image search: [Google]

612KB, 1314x564px

>>186205697
It seems he didn't enter and nobody even got enough referrals to win the trip to gamescom.
Also according to an anon a few threads ago some people had their entry to the contest invalidated.

File: don't ask me I'm just a lead writer.png (645KB, 1008x686px) Image search: [Google]

645KB, 1008x686px

>WTFOSAURUS is done with SC
>Bad News Baron would rather play No Meme's Sky than SC
This is too fucking funny.

>>186207294
Literally who?

>>186201428
Yea just like LTI ships will be, dad.

laffs@u

File: eJwNxUEOhCAMAMC_8AAKtNDqbwgSNFEh0j1t_PvuXOZrPs9pVrOrjrkCbMcs_dns1P7kVm3rvZ01j2Pa0i_IqrnsV711QuCYJDH_cwGTIwJ0jokwegkRl8gewZOIFxIMaWE77mbeH78oIoQ.5gPoI2AcvlnC-_u7aoE124FzwiA.png (204KB, 329x393px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 329x393px

>>186205990
Yeah what's the deal with that?
Why would they ban/invalidate some people regarding fucking referrals??
Are they being kikes and backtracking on the whole 'win a fucking trip to Germanistan etc.' because it's (((too much))) money for them after all???

File: eJwNxVEOgyAMANC7cABaEVr1FLsCQYIaXQnUj2XZ3ef7eV9zt9MsZlOtfQFY956krbartFiyLSLlzLHu3Sa5IKrGtF35rR0cB5qI-QndSOg9uJncODMTBQ48TB7h88KGA9ujFvP7AwFfIeY.qV_Q5HS8mDHwA6PmK9I7id9-yGA.jpg (89KB, 680x418px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 680x418px

>>186207294
Good, at least I might be able to watch that weekly shitshow of theirs without his mug around.
AndNothingWasLost.jpg

>>186207294
who?

>>186205990
who the fuck is jfeezy

>>186205990
>nobody even got enough referrals to win the trip
Imagine that. Whoever suggest a referral contest with 2.6.3 should be fired. We all know how that would never happen though.

>>186147430
>Neglecting to mention the insane feat of durability that is FSD supercharging off a neutron star.

File: 20170725183551_1.jpg (86KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 1920x1080px

>>186211509
I can never seem to do this. I've come up to neutron stars and done what you're supposed to do (move outward from the star along the shaft), managed to stay inside the shaft for over five seconds, and nothing. Is it only certain neutron stars? I've noticed the ones in the tutorial videos I've seen have shafts that gyrate, but I've never seen one do that in-game. I don't want to do much experimentation either, because getting your ship trapped in one of those things sucks dick.

>>186213485
Do you have a fuel scoop? You better have a fuel scoop.

>>186213564
Yeah, I had one. Pretty sure, anyway.

>>186209584
>Mfw the trip aint gonna be worth it cuz they aint gonna show anything of value until 2018

>>186213485
You need to go really slow for it to work. Approach the shaft approximately halfway/two thirds away from the star itself. Immediately after you've entered the shaft, turn towards the end of the shaft (away from the star), and start accelerating slowly. Once you get the message that your FSD has been overcharged, you can turn out of the shaft.

The first couple of times will be difficult cause you'll have a hard time gauging the speed needed and may not spend enough time inside the shaft, but you'll get there with practice.

Also, yeah, you need a fuel scoop for it to work I'm pretty sure.

>>186219518
Next time I feel like attempting again, I'll grab my Hauler taxi and give it a shot. Thanks for the tips

>>186210561
Google ads anon? Maybe?

>>186221330
Needs to be shopped to say "Ready to letdown... #Gamescom2017 #StarCitizen"

Yearly reminder that Frontier will go back on every single promise they make at Gamescom, and probably within days.

>>186222425
link your reddit so i can upvote

>>186221330
Why do they try to hype this shit when they have nothing to show?

>>186221330
GET READY

FOR THE VIDEOGAME TRAILER EVENT OF THE SUMMER

CRITICS ARE CALLING IT "nothing", and "literally out of this world"
PC GAMER SAYS "shits never coming out man"

THIS SUMMER, HOLD ONTO YOUR WALLETS, AND OPEN THEM WIDE... FOR
STAR.
CITIZEN.

rated G for gullible

>>186207294
>watching streamers play a game that isnt out
>watching streamers vent their emotions and wild opinions about SC because they can't make easy money streaming it yet
>implying any of them really care about the game and were just hopping on the train early assuming theyd have a game to stream by now

most of them are just another lazy fuckboy who doesnt want a real job, so they see some big new game coming out and try to be the first big streamer who streams it. now theyre all falling apart because they tried making that quick buck too early

File: (laughs).png (135KB, 720x410px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 720x410px

>>186225560

>Roadmap to 4.0
>Small joke about being a year late with 3.0
>Spectrum shit no one cares about
>3.0 demo showing off fauna, outposts, possibly with 5 players.
>SQ42 trailer teaser

Maybe we'll get more cringeworthy Chris moments. Like the ''Just do it!'' stuff of last year.

>>186207294
>WTFOSAURUS
He said if he quit SC, he wasn't going to stream because he would have to start over again. Now he's live with more viewers than he ever had on SC playing something else.
Is there something about being a backer where people think they can just say words at us and we would forget them as soon as they are said?

>>186226775
>Roadmap to 4.0
>3.0 still hasn't made it to evocati
This is the most plausible thing I have heard so far. Titan suit is unlikely because CIG would have to actually show some work, unless it's just a jpeg. SQ42 is even less likely because it is supposed to be waiting on 3.0 tech, which is still months away. CIG planning something when they haven't finished what they started already seems much more likely and consistent with past performance.

>>186226167
Reminder that boredgamer is the only true autist out of all the SC streamers and he's /ourguy/

>>186228484
He makes his channel almost completely out of promo material from CIG and is too fucking lazy to record his own footage. Additionally, all he does is puts words from CIG on the screen, then reads them. It doesn't even qualify as commentary, he is literally reading someone else's words and showing someone else's video and basically contributing nothing of his own besides baseless speculation.
Boredgamer is literally the laziest piece of shit of YT.

>>186226775
>>Roadmap to 4.0
lmao
More like Roadmap to minimum viable product (3.0).

File: tumblr_mu2aec630t1si28izo1_1280.png (116KB, 1038x1192px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 1038x1192px

>>186229793
>More like Roadmap to minimum viable product (3.0).

YOU TAKE THAT BACK!

Can someone post that comfy freelancer base timelaps?

File: Fucko.png (136KB, 665x425px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 665x425px

>>186222418
Google ads anon had over 7k referrals, some people have been banned from the referral "contest" and no one fucking knows why.
I smell faggotry an kikes from all the way across the Atlantic on this one..!

>>186235783
>referral Idris has LTI
>referral Gladius and Dragonfly have 6 months insurance

>>186226775
>We had a "beyond 3.0" roadmap last year
>It will be just as relevant this year because none of it is out

File: 1502715879569.gif (2MB, 380x380px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 380x380px

If you get enough robot parts from near deaths, will it reduce the amount of air you need?

>>186235783
he got banned for botting

File: Catgirly.gif (349KB, 260x400px) Image search: [Google]

349KB, 260x400px

>>186236507

>>186236507
*posts speculative response*
*proceeds to praise games innovation of non existing features*

File: 1497216470508.jpg (218KB, 1280x1084px) Image search: [Google]

218KB, 1280x1084px

what happened to fat ben's second eye? he had some kind of operation I think

>>186237009
I was just wondering if It had been mentioned. With the way death and replacement has been laid out it would make some sense they'd flesh out the systems by which robo part operate.

>they just reenact last years gamescon as if it never happened

File: eJwNxUsOhSAMAMC7cADKp1LwNgQJmqgQWlfGu783m3nVM0-1ql1k8AqwHVz63DRLn7lV3XpvZ83jYF36BVkkl_2qtzA4WkIMRP-M88Eggjc-ODTo42Jisi4gWIzkrKeEKVo97qa-H76sIn0.OIfuOiSdzGUI4E5GD5c9eYC2Veo.png (12KB, 236x214px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 236x214px

>>186237203
He had an artificial lens inserted(??) and now he's gon' be blind for the next couple of weeks.
Fat fuck is gonna become blind for real before the SC project reaches 'late alpha'.

>>186236507

>robots mentioned either on video gaming or sci fi movies
>"mah waifus, mah rubber fucks, mah dick..."
>no one remembered that robots could do all the hand work, cleaning/storing the dishes, cleaning the house, farming, construction etc

Priorities faggots. Ho do they work?

>>186145258

Whats that? The heavy heavy pajamas? So some faggot with a sniper headshots you and loots your crap?

>>186145258
>Contradiction !B3CMbEoo4o
I get it. As in Derek Dumb.

File: 1478134150975.png (722KB, 903x587px) Image search: [Google]

722KB, 903x587px

Are there even any active SC streamers left to do gamescom for them?

>>186243858
nice costume, what gay fetish is that?

>>186243858
>wh*te people

>>186110118
I like that the ship shaking at the end is almost like the player frustration

File: big benny3.jpg (193KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 1920x1080px

>>186241250
>inb4 3.0 delayed until Ben's vision returns since Chris would feel bad releasing his magnum opus (MVP) without his autistic Wing Commander fanboy being able to see it.
inb4 he's permanently blind

>3.0 delayed, months behind schedule, past gamescom without estimated release date
>Little to no remarkable content being released
why give a shit about this game?

File: cosplay comparison.png (751KB, 1281x721px) Image search: [Google]

751KB, 1281x721px

>>186244587
Cuckoldry

0-4 and I play ED and start the trip back to the core from Jaques

5-9 and I play cookie clicker all night while chugging beers.

File: willkommen in der holle.gif (772KB, 491x264px) Image search: [Google]

772KB, 491x264px

>>186247553

>>186247553
Just play Diablo 3 it's very satisfying and more glorified cookie clicker. I wouldn't touch ED at all. I stopped, my savefile is still at Quince...

File: 1490474855872.png (142KB, 305x309px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 305x309px

>>186243858
His 'gimp' suit without the hood o' latex and gag-ball.

>>186132887
>Aside from one being a JPG
>corvettes.jpg

hate to break it to ya but they're both JPGs

>>186249334
>Just play Diablo 3
I don't fancy grinding the same route for 100 hours to get a legendary weapon for a class I don't even have a character for. I prefer my isometric loot-centered dungeon crawler games to actually have viable loot in them.

Should I get an imperial eagle or an imperial courier to bounty hunt? I have a viper mk3 but I kinda want to try something different or at least better looking until I get money to buy an explorer ship.

File: NMS 2017-08-15 22-07-06-06.jpg (154KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 1920x1080px

>>186245289
the shaking is from ships landing at the station, though why a space station shakes from ships landing at it while ground based landing platforms don't is beyond me

>>186256304

Lucky bastard. Must be a 25+ slot fighter judging by the pic. I almost started a new game some time ago, but its so fucking grindy!

>>186261627
34 slot. Yeah, it was a lucky find. Ugly yellow color though.

You could always play in creation mode, although it's annoying that they also make you unhurtable in that mode instead of just letting it be a low grind mode.

What does the Atlas path get me? Is is worth completing that before going for the center?

>>186262119

I like survival but never risk an instant death game (its torrented, so no achievement).

Theres actually a new class of ship called exotic with massive bonues (around 40 - 50 - 50) but they are as good or inferior to a S class fighter for combat and have very few slots.

A class fighters, S class shuttles and B class Haulers are the "accessible" ships one should look for in terms of price at the very start (assuming you are actually buying). Very affordable, although haulers are always expensive as hell when the slots are good.

>>186262484

>*bonuses